Sasquatch

[oklahomasasquatch]

quote: The Patterson-Gimlin film is a hoax.....

Ok Breadbunner.....tell me why it's a hoax.

[Rowdy]

quote:Originally posted by jdb

Back when I had something to prove, I spent a good deal of time in the deep woods of several remote areas.

At 3:00 am: a pack of raccoons raiding the camp, a wild pig rushing out of canyon, a grunting bear on the path in front of one can all make one pee his pants.

It's not about smelling nasty aromas anymore then it is terrible noises that curl your toes.

It's that there have been hoards of well equipped people hunting BF's and still have nothing respectable to show for the efforts.

Back in my day, walking you back to the truck was a 12 day adventure of it's own.

If your "bet" included me, you lost, bud.

jdb

A pack of raccoons can make one excrete liquid waste?

[Breadburner]

Well when the Film-maker(s) purchase a "Sasquatch Suit" before the film was shot.... It screams hoax to me....

[jdb]

Originally posted by Rowdy


A pack of raccoons can make one excrete liquid waste?


When twelve of the guys circle a dying fire, start boldly moving, rear-up on their backlegs and begin grunting...ones attention is caught.

When you think their about to leap in for the kill - and the brain is only registaring one word, "Rabies" - yeah, bladder controll can becoam an issue.

[oklahomasasquatch]

Wow bread your sure know alot of facts to make that judgement on the film.

Here's the real facts

Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin two completely broke rodeo workers pack up to go search for bigfoot in the Pacific North West there hopes on filming it. They make there way to Bluff Creek were they film a Female Sasquatch which was squatting by the creek. It gets up and walks away from the camera. You can't really say it's a guy in a monkey suit....because its not you can see its shoulder blades moving, muscle groups moving, it's breasts, zoomed in you can see facial movement, and plus it's arms are far much longer than a humans. Oh well it doesn't matter weather you believe it or not, I'm just stating the obvious facts.

[xjay]

It's been quite interesting posting to this thread.  It's always good to have a few skeptics visit to keep everyong honest, lol.  I just wanted to bump the thread so I could again state that Bigfoot is a real, living primate that exists without anyones permission.  Hey, if WE don't tell you this(because we have seen them) who the hell is?

[xjay]

Here's someone we all should know.  He is catching far more flack over Bigfoot than we few: http://www.forbes.com/entrepreneurs/feeds/ap/2006/11/03/ap3144443.html

[xjay]

Here's a link to a new story in the news: http://www.themilwaukeechannel.com/news/10286534/detail.html

[Sardonicus Rex]

I think a small, shaven Sasquatch was seen riding a bike in yesterday's Veterans Day parade ...

http://www.tulsanow.org/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=5350

[Breadburner]

If Sasquatch and Chewbacca were in the UFC and had a bout....Who do you think would win...?

My money is on Chewbacca for a number of reasons.....

[xjay]

You funny bunny...Chewbacca IS a Sasquatch, lol.

[papaspot]

quote:Originally posted by xjay

It's been quite interesting posting to this thread.  It's always good to have a few skeptics visit to keep everyong honest, lol.  I just wanted to bump the thread so I could again state that Bigfoot is a real, living primate that exists without anyones permission.  Hey, if WE don't tell you this(because we have seen them) who the hell is?

I guess the thing that I find most remarkable about the existence of Bigfoot is that, even though they've found almost complete skeletons of many creatures that lived 70 million and more years ago, they haven't ran across so much as a pinkie bone from from a creature that's living right next to us. To me that's just incredible. And by incredible, I mean lacking all credibility.

[xjay]

Hi Papaspot.  I agree with you that not having a body for proof (or any part of a Bigfoot body) is very strange indeed, but as it has been said: "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence."  Only recently (1903) was a body brought back to prove the existence of the gorilla.  Only recently have we had a body to prove that the giant squid exists, even though many speculated that they must because of the large suction cup scars found on many sperm whales.  We do have footprint casts of Bigfoot from the 1960s that show dermal ridges (like the dermal ridges that make up fingerprints).  These ridges on the footprint casts run in the opposite direction of human footprint ridges.  Also, never has the body of a bear that has died of natural causes ever been discovered.  The bodies of dead bears that have been discovered were victims of gun shots or truck accidents, etc.  It has been suggested that Sasquatch creatures may bury their dead.  I understand that you will have to see a Bigfoot creature in order to believe that they exist.  I know they exist and I will not pretend that they do not.  I don't know why we don't have a body by now...but I know it is very possible to get one, just not very easy.

[papaspot]

quote:Originally posted by xjay

Hi Papaspot.  I agree with you that not having a body for proof (or any part of a Bigfoot body) is very strange indeed, but as it has been said: "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence."  Only recently (1903) was a body brought back to prove the existence of the gorilla.  Only recently have we had a body to prove that the giant squid exists, even though many speculated that they must because of the large suction cup scars found on many sperm whales.  We do have footprint casts of Bigfoot from the 1960s that show dermal ridges (like the dermal ridges that make up fingerprints).  These ridges on the footprint casts run in the opposite direction of human footprint ridges.  Also, never has the body of a bear that has died of natural causes ever been discovered.  The bodies of dead bears that have been discovered were victims of gun shots or truck accidents, etc.  It has been suggested that Sasquatch creatures may bury their dead.  I understand that you will have to see a Bigfoot creature in order to believe that they exist.  I know they exist and I will not pretend that they do not.  I don't know why we don't have a body by now...but I know it is very possible to get one, just not very easy.

As far as the giant squid, etc., none of the creatures that you mention live in Arkansas, Oklahoma, etc. It's a little bit less likely that you'd run across the body of a creature that lives hundreds of feet down into the ocean than one that supposedly lives where thousands and thousands of people live, hike, fish and hunt. As far as the body of a naturally dead bear never being found, I find that a little bit hard to believe.

So maybe Bigfoot buries it's dead? Humans bury our dead and we run across bodies of naturally dead humans.

As far as the dermal ridges, I'd like to see the evidence. You got any links? And I'm not talking about any 9/11 conspiracy-type sites. I'm talking about impartial sites that DON'T have an agenda (like proving the existence of Bigfoot). I'll look with an open mind at any legitimate evidence but if I open up a site and it's obviously a 'Bigfoot lives' site, I won't waste one minute with it.

[Breadburner]

quote:Originally posted by xjay

You funny bunny...Chewbacca IS a Sasquatch, lol.

Yes he is....They are both very tall guys in costumes....Good work coming clean....