As far as I can tell, this is a Mixed Use Corridor in the Comp Plan land use map. (It's hard to tell b/c there are 3 shades of pink that are nearly indistinguishable.)
The parcels appear to be the "Mixed-Use Corridor" pale pink, and are within an "Area of Growth" (on a different map).
But I don't think the land use map has much credibility or usefulness. In my opinion, creating that map was a huge waste of time. And the same for the parcel-specific stability/growth map -- a waste of resources and time during the Planitulsa process. The comp plan maps were intended to be generalized, not parcel-specific.
Recently, both the TMAPC and the City Council unanimously approved a PUD for a parking lot in a Mixed Use Corridor (it was supporting a single business that already had ample parking, so it wasn't benefiting any "mix" of uses). So, as you can see, this designation doesn't mean anything to the Tulsa Metropolitan Rubber Stamp Committee.
The TMAPC makes recommendations to the City Council. I don't know which PUD case you're describing (Harley-Davidson, perhaps??), but if the City Council
unanimously revised the zoning map to create a PUD for a parking lot, then the City Council did the important rubber stamping, the rubber stamping that actually changed a city ordinance. The TMAPC can rubber stamp an applicant's PUD proposal for a big parking lot, but only the City Council can amend the zoning map. Are you combining the TMAPC and the City Council into one single rubber stamp committee?
Who defines what a "Mixed-Use Corridor" is? Who decides which parcels will be shown in "Mixed-Use Corridor" pale pink on the land use map?
Helmerich Park is "Park and Open Space" green on the land use map. So what?
After hours and hours of studying land use patterns and mapping individual parcels, the Fregonese team categorized Turkey Mountain as an "Existing Neighborhood." In my opinion, Turkey Mountain would fit the "Park and Open Space" category, but the Fregonese team chose the "Existing Neighborhood" pale yellow for Turkey Mountain instead.
There isn't a good reason to spend time and tax dollars creating inaccurate and relatively useless maps. There's no need to have them, and no need to look at them.