How on earth did you come to that conclusion?
Easy.
The majority of the group are very young (18-29) with half of them employed full time. Close to half did not vote in the last election, those that did, overwhelmingly voted for President Obama. Though they are angry at the politics of the day, 25% say they still will not vote in 2012. When asked why, those people said they were "turned off by our political system." Of the majority that will vote, almost half pledge continuing support to President Obama.
The largest proportion of respondents say they are frustrated with the influence of corporate/moneyed/special interests, yet they are willing to vote for President Obama, and they attribute no blame to Congress (which means they don't understand our form of government, see below).
Question 18 was open ended, meaning that they could say what they want. When asked "Who would you say is most to blame for our failure to address our problems?" there was no responses for "Congress," and "Special Interests" only got a 8% response even though the exact same question (#16) worded differently resulted in a 30% response for "Corporate/Moneyed/Special interests." This tells me that they don't have a clear thought process on the who/when/what/why.
Question 20 asks if they would support violence to achieve their goals. This indicates the willingness of the group to throw a tantrum if they cannot get their way. Because they are not protesting the government, but rather protesting a segment of the people, this indicates that they are willing to abandon democratic means to achieve their goals and engage in criminal activity.
They see money. They want that money. They want the government to loot it for them. If that will not work, they will threaten violence.
These are child's answers.