Since it is not near Atoka.
My guess is it's because there is a contingency of the 'infrastructure' cost - the $250 million ish #
The requirement to get the LEAD Act $ is a binding, no contingency agreement - which technically it doesn't appear that Panasonic has signed one.
Doesn't mean they can't easily work this out. He's posturing to get the tax cuts passed - he's been pushing for the elimination of state income tax for a while. Stitt is in agreement there, the Senate does not appear to be interested in doing any resident income tax reduction.
Let's see how dramatic Republicans can be with each other

and I don't get why they are having this discussion/debate now and didn't hammer this out a longtime ago. This is the frustrating part of Oklahoma is they don't seem to ever take any type of economic development deal seriously.
But... even if the money goes back in the general revenue fund they can just reallocate it back to Panasonic anyways.