It's a pretty out-of-date moniker, but it's true. The Columbia Journalism Review came down really hard on the paper back in 1999 for its blatant bias towards all things Gaylord. Pretty entertaining read:
http://backissues.cjrarchives.org/year/99/1/worst.aspEDITThe article states,
quote:
Is there hope for change at the Oklahoman? Being a fat, incurious monopoly has bred both a management and newsroom culture that ridicules critics and rewards mediocrity. There are, however, some talented journalists at the Oklahoman, not the least of whom is Ed Kelley. Every critic I interviewed said Kelley was capable of turning the Oklahoman into a respectable newspaper. "I have nothing but the highest respect for Ed," says former Oklahoman staffer Rieger. "I think he honestly wants to make a great paper."
Pretty funny. I still think he's a jerk after this. I just wonder, when was the last time this guy even visited Tulsa?