A grassroots organization focused on the intelligent and sustainable development, preservation and revitalization of Tulsa.
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 22, 2024, 09:19:15 am
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Kaiser River Plan Revealed  (Read 21328 times)
patric
T-Town Elder
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 8124


These Aren't the Droids You're Looking For


« Reply #45 on: February 11, 2007, 01:45:16 pm »

quote:
Originally posted by AVERAGE JOE

First blush: looks a reasonable set of concepts, and I particularly appreciate the fact they acknowledge that a lot more work and study needs to be done. Also noted -- they plan on the public taking part in the process once the engineering studies of what's possible are done.


The Whirled reports make it sound like the miniature divided highway is a done-deal proclamation, or are you referring to the new plan to put water in the river?

Question to the daily trail users:
I see the logic in widening the trail from it's original 8' fire lane width, but would two such trails really be necessary?

"(The) First rule in government spending: Why build one when you can have two at twice the price?"
   -- Carl Sagan, "Contact"
Logged

"Tulsa will lay off police and firemen before we will cut back on unnecessarily wasteful streetlights."  -- March 18, 2009 TulsaNow Forum
brunoflipper
El Presidente
City Father
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1703



WWW
« Reply #46 on: February 11, 2007, 01:48:05 pm »

quote:
Originally posted by patric

quote:
Originally posted by AVERAGE JOE

First blush: looks a reasonable set of concepts, and I particularly appreciate the fact they acknowledge that a lot more work and study needs to be done. Also noted -- they plan on the public taking part in the process once the engineering studies of what's possible are done.


The Whirled reports make it sound like the miniature divided highway is a done-deal proclamation, or are you referring to the new plan to put water in the river?

Question to the daily trail users:
I see the logic in widening the trail from it's original 8' fire lane width, but would two such trails really be necessary?

"The first rule of government spending: why build only one when you can have two at twice the price?"
   -- Carl Sagan, "Contact"

yes... on a daily basis, i am nearly run over by a cyclist... or, depending on your point of view, i nearly cause one of them to crash...
Logged

"It costs a fortune to look this trashy..."
"Don't believe in riches but you should see where I live..."

http://www.stopabductions.com/
Rage
Guest
« Reply #47 on: February 11, 2007, 01:57:30 pm »

Hey at least there trying to do something but its a waste on just a path way...

Logged
Ed W
City Father
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2941



« Reply #48 on: February 11, 2007, 01:57:37 pm »

quote:
Originally posted by patric


I see the logic in widening the trail from it's original 8' fire lane width, but would two such trails really be necessary?




The River Park Authority had a meeting two years ago regarding conflicts between pedestrians, skaters, and cyclists.  At high-use times, the congestion along the trail causes hazards to all trail users.  That's why there's now some signage and lane markings.  Back then, the idea of separated facilities was discussed, but funds were not available.

Chicago marked lanes along the popular lake front trail in an effort to separate cyclists and pedestrians.  It's had mixed success.  Too many people ignore the rules.  Should we expect better results here?
Logged

Ed

May you live in interesting times.
waterboy
Guest
« Reply #49 on: February 11, 2007, 03:17:32 pm »

quote:
Originally posted by Ed W

quote:
Originally posted by patric


I see the logic in widening the trail from it's original 8' fire lane width, but would two such trails really be necessary?




The River Park Authority had a meeting two years ago regarding conflicts between pedestrians, skaters, and cyclists.  At high-use times, the congestion along the trail causes hazards to all trail users.  That's why there's now some signage and lane markings.  Back then, the idea of separated facilities was discussed, but funds were not available.

Chicago marked lanes along the popular lake front trail in an effort to separate cyclists and pedestrians.  It's had mixed success.  Too many people ignore the rules.  Should we expect better results here?



Good point! Every once in awhile I come across a strange jogger on the path that decides to run against traffic and refuses to yield. He's in good shape and looks loaded for bear so most of us just move over. Some day he's going to catch me in one of my moods and we'll end up on the evening news!
Logged
Ed W
City Father
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2941



« Reply #50 on: February 11, 2007, 04:16:50 pm »

quote:
Originally posted by waterboy

 Every once in awhile I come across a strange jogger on the path that decides to run against traffic and refuses to yield. He's in good shape and looks loaded for bear so most of us just move over. Some day he's going to catch me in one of my moods and we'll end up on the evening news!



My son was about 12 when he rode the trail for the first time.  He quickly discovered that the sight lines and bend radius made it difficult to determine which side of the trail a runner was on.  "You can't go FAST here, Dad!" he said.  This from a kid who had only two speeds: stopped and as fast as possible.

There are allegedly two speed limit signs posted somewhere along the trail.  It has a 10mph speed limit which is probably fine for someone out for their annual bike ride, but it's far too low for anyone reasonably fit.  Toss in a stiff tailwind, and a cyclist can cruise along at 25 mph.  Someone going that fast should be out on Riverside Drive, not the trail.
Logged

Ed

May you live in interesting times.
AVERAGE JOE
Guest
« Reply #51 on: February 11, 2007, 04:47:41 pm »

quote:
Originally posted by patric

quote:
Originally posted by AVERAGE JOE

First blush: looks a reasonable set of concepts, and I particularly appreciate the fact they acknowledge that a lot more work and study needs to be done. Also noted -- they plan on the public taking part in the process once the engineering studies of what's possible are done.


The Whirled reports make it sound like the miniature divided highway is a done-deal proclamation, or are you referring to the new plan to put water in the river?

Question to the daily trail users:
I see the logic in widening the trail from it's original 8' fire lane width, but would two such trails really be necessary?

"(The) First rule in government spending: Why build one when you can have two at twice the price?"
   -- Carl Sagan, "Contact"


Um, the big announcement on the front page of the paper -- the actual plan for two new pedestrian bridges, etc.
Logged
TheArtist
T-Town Elder
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 6804



WWW
« Reply #52 on: February 11, 2007, 06:38:38 pm »

I would looooove to see 2 different trails. Would be nice to have trails of different speeds.  When bikeriding or rollerblading I am always afraid someone walking their dog that the dog may swerve in front of me and kids often dont pay the best attention to what is going on. Course when I am on my rollerblades I am in danger of falling on anyone, walking or biking, plus trees, benches,poles, rocks, statues, bridges,crow creek, etc. etc. lol.  I would assume that only one of the two will have the chat so likely that would help divide them between walkers/joggers and the other bikers and rollerbladers.  Unless the one is half paved and half chat then I guess rollerbladers could go on both.  One lane designated as a bike lane here and there with signs would be nice too. Hopefully people here would mostly abide by that. My assumption would be that the lane closest to the river would be for walking and running.
Logged

"When you only have two pennies left in the world, buy a loaf of bread with one, and a lily with the other."-Chinese proverb. "Arts a staple. Like bread or wine or a warm coat in winter. Those who think it is a luxury have only a fragment of a mind. Mans spirit grows hungry for art in the same way h
carltonplace
Historic Artifact
City Father
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4587



WWW
« Reply #53 on: February 12, 2007, 08:01:55 am »

^ That's one thing that really annoys me when I'm on the trails.

People, please watch out for your children and animals; they are not able to look out for themselves. I've seen little children walk right in front of cyclists while their gaurdian was talking into their cell phone. I've never seen a child get hit, but I've seen a cyclist hit the deck to avoid a child. One crazy parent started berrating a cyclist because he yelled out in surpise when her child walked in front of him. She cursed him up and down, the whole time with her cell phone to her ear and oblivious to what nearly happened.

When I walk my dogs on the river, we stay off of the trail. If we have to use the trail, I keep my eyes peeled. When I'm running I stay far to the right, and remain cognizant of the people using the trail around me.

I think dual trails are going to be a benefit as long as people still pay attention where the trails merge at 21st and at 31st.
Logged
SXSW
City Father
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4862


WWW
« Reply #54 on: February 03, 2010, 04:36:43 pm »

An update on this project: the section from 58th to 71st should be done by March, weather permitting.  The trail from 11th to 48th was completed last spring and the final section from 48th to 58th, halted due to the I-44 construction, should be completed by early 2011.  That will be a great day when this entire new dual trail is finished between 11th and 71st.  Maybe Kaiser will announce another grant to extend the dual trail further south past the Creek Casino?



http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx?subjectid=11&articleid=20100203_11_A22_Cyclis925527&allcom=1#commentform
« Last Edit: February 03, 2010, 04:38:51 pm by SXSW » Logged

 
sgrizzle
Kung Fu Treachery
T-Town Elder
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 16038


Inconceivable!


WWW
« Reply #55 on: February 03, 2010, 08:29:17 pm »

An update on this project: the section from 58th to 71st should be done by March, weather permitting.  The trail from 11th to 48th was completed last spring and the final section from 48th to 58th, halted due to the I-44 construction, should be completed by early 2011.  That will be a great day when this entire new dual trail is finished between 11th and 71st.  Maybe Kaiser will announce another grant to extend the dual trail further south past the Creek Casino?


The Creeks are supposed to be revamping the area near the casino.
Logged
charky
Civic Leader
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 187


WWW
« Reply #56 on: February 04, 2010, 04:06:44 am »

Good news!

(saw our buddy sauerkraut pop up in comments section of this TW article.   Sad Same old tired talking points.)
Logged

 
rwarn17588
Guest
« Reply #57 on: February 04, 2010, 06:42:49 am »

Good news!

(saw our buddy sauerkraut pop up in comments section of this TW article.   Sad Same old tired talking points.)

I guess he got tired of being deservedly mocked here. He'll fit right into the cretins in the TW comments section.
Logged
Conan71
Recovering Republican
T-Town Elder
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 29334



« Reply #58 on: February 04, 2010, 11:09:47 am »

Good news!

(saw our buddy sauerkraut pop up in comments section of this TW article.   Sad Same old tired talking points.)

That's weird supposedly buys a house here then we never hear from him again.

Any bets on an over/under on his IQ?  I'm guessing 90.
Logged

"It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first” -Ronald Reagan
Townsend
T-Town Elder
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 12195



« Reply #59 on: February 04, 2010, 11:12:41 am »

That's weird supposedly buys a house here then we never hear from him again.

Any bets on an over/under on his IQ?  I'm guessing 90.

I always assumed the medical trials went awry.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

 
  Hosted by TulsaConnect and Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
 

Mission

 

"TulsaNow's Mission is to help Tulsa become the most vibrant, diverse, sustainable and prosperous city of our size. We achieve this by focusing on the development of Tulsa's distinctive identity and economic growth around a dynamic, urban core, complemented by a constellation of livable, thriving communities."
more...

 

Contact

 

2210 S Main St.
Tulsa, OK 74114
(918) 409-2669
info@tulsanow.org