Yes, he'll wave his magic wand and make that happen.
You complained that he didn't do anything regarding the banks, but it happened. You complain he's not doing this or that or the other, but in almost every case, something has actually been done. Maybe not something that you agree with ideologically, but still something done. Disagree with him all you want, god knows I do on enough things, but knocking him for not getting things done is completely contrary to the man's record.
Also, I believe the several million people who have returned to employment (not nearly enough, obviously) in the last two years would be happy to dance a little jig for you. I don't know that I have the power to arrange that, however.
And you should reread the list. Many things on it have nothing to do with new bureaucracy. Also, I find it interesting how earlier you were complaining that the banks were being left alone and now you're complaining that better regulating the banks is somehow a bad thing.
Speaking of discretionary spending, this is the problem that must be solved. Not solving it means continuing at a permanently reduced state of employment: