The Tulsa Forum by TulsaNow

Talk About Tulsa => Development & New Businesses => Topic started by: cks511 on September 13, 2007, 01:57:29 PM

Title: Swirling 'bout the bowl.....imho
Post by: cks511 on September 13, 2007, 01:57:29 PM
http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx?articleID=070913_1__Mayor00288
Title: Swirling 'bout the bowl.....imho
Post by: swake on September 13, 2007, 02:16:54 PM
quote:
Originally posted by cks511

http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx?articleID=070913_1__Mayor00288



And here begins the efforts of the bait and switch crowd,

They didn't want vision 2025, they wanted the river, now they don't want the river they want streets, now here is a plan to improved streets and it's already a piece of crap swirling in a bowl. My guess will be this round they will cry the money should be spent on cops instead of streets. Lets see if I'm right.

What they really don't want is a government that uses taxes, at all.
Title: Swirling 'bout the bowl.....imho
Post by: Rico on September 13, 2007, 02:37:29 PM
quote:
Originally posted by swake

quote:
Originally posted by cks511

http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx?articleID=070913_1__Mayor00288



And here begins the efforts of the bait and switch crowd,

They didn't want vision 2025, they wanted the river, now they don't want the river they want streets, now here is a plan to improved streets nd it's already a piece of crap swirling in a bowl. My guess will be this round they will cry the money should be spent on cops instead of streets. Lets see if I'm right.

What they really don't want is a government that uses taxes, at all.



I don't get that from the post or the thread title Mister Swake...

Many have been saying that they want the streets fixed before the "river"...

How convenient that they hold a press conference regarding a plan to fix the streets..



That being said, I will reserve judgment on the "street" plans until I hear more of the facts.

p.s. Rock the River is tonight and it's Free...
see you there..? Or be square...!



[}:)]
Title: Swirling 'bout the bowl.....imho
Post by: cks511 on September 13, 2007, 04:11:06 PM
AND......FLUSHING.......LOL
Title: Swirling 'bout the bowl.....imho
Post by: Townsend on September 13, 2007, 04:45:01 PM
They announced a panel

http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx?articleID=070913_1__Mayor80543

Mayor Kathy Taylor and Councilor Bill Martinson on Thursday announced the formation of a panel that will look at how the city can best plan, fund and contract needed street repairs.

Dewey Bartlett Jr. and Sharon King Davis will lead the panel, which is expected to deliver a report by Dec. 1.

Taylor stopped short of saying that it is the first step toward putting together a streets tax package to send to voters.

"I think that's putting the cart before the horse," she said. "We have to look at all funding options that are available to us."

1st comment is not surprising.
Title: Swirling 'bout the bowl.....imho
Post by: MichaelBates on September 13, 2007, 04:52:18 PM
Who'll  be in charge? (//%22http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx?articleID=070913_1__Mayor80543%22)

quote:

Mayor Kathy Taylor and Councilor Bill Martinson on Thursday announced the formation of a panel that will look at how the city can best plan, fund and contract needed street repairs.

Dewey Bartlett Jr. and Sharon King Davis will lead the panel, which is expected to deliver a report by Dec. 1.



You'd think Tulsa had a population of 200, and no population east of Yale or north of 15th Street, the way the same people get recycled to head "blue ribbon" commissions.

If Taylor and Martinson were serious about a plan to fix the streets, they might bring in someone with some experience in the subject -- say, a former Street Commissioner like Jim Hewgley, or some of the city engineers and managers from back when we had decent streets.

Or you might prefer a Tulsa World commenter's gut reaction.

quote:
Sharon King Davis will lead the panel? Holy crap we are doomed.
Title: Swirling 'bout the bowl.....imho
Post by: Ibanez on September 13, 2007, 05:10:21 PM
So they have a plan to have a plan?

Brilliant!
Title: Swirling 'bout the bowl.....imho
Post by: swake on September 14, 2007, 08:04:05 AM
Like Waterboy pointed out, the misogyny in some quarters in this town is stiking.


Look, a woman doing something, get her!
Title: Swirling 'bout the bowl.....imho
Post by: MichaelBates on September 14, 2007, 09:50:46 AM
quote:
Originally posted by swake

Like Waterboy pointed out, the misogyny in some quarters in this town is stiking.


Look, a woman doing something, get her!




Women in public life are immune from criticism? The guy didn't say, "A woman? Holy crap, we're doomed." He said, "Sharon King Davis? Holy crap, we're doomed."

Misogyny? I suspect most of the people who complain about Kathy Taylor and Randi Miller could give you a long list of female politicians whom they have supported, even when running against male politicians in the same party. I certainly can:

I campaigned for State Rep. Pam Peterson in a 2004 primary where she ran against and handily defeated four male opponents.

After she beat me in a primary in 1998, I campaigned for Anna Falling for City Council, supported her again in 2000 (when some people were encouraging me to challenge her in a primary), and backed her in her primary and runoff for County Commissioner.

In 2002, I was involved with the campaigns of Denise Bode for AG and Dana Murphy for Corporation Commissioner, who both had tough primaries against male opponents.

In 2000 and 2002, I was involved with (hangs head in embarrassment) Randi Miller's campaigns  for City Council and County Commission.

I was involved with the campaigns of Brigitte Harper and Edith Shoals for State Senate and State House in north Tulsa, Sue Tibbs, and Nancy Riley (before she converted).

And like any good conservative, I'm a Margaret Thatcher fan.

Your misogyny charge is a baseless insult. It is an attempt to shut down any criticism of the actions or qualifications of an elected official or public figure who happens to be female and happens to agree with you.
Title: Swirling 'bout the bowl.....imho
Post by: sgrizzle on September 14, 2007, 09:50:53 AM
<insert joke about concrete not lasting 50 years here>

I don't think it's misogyny, I just think it looks too much like KT is just picking up her T-Mobile phone and selecting committees like she selects her "five."
Title: Swirling 'bout the bowl.....imho
Post by: TheArtist on September 14, 2007, 09:55:17 AM
quote:
Originally posted by sgrizzle

<insert joke about concrete not lasting 50 years here>

I don't think it's misogyny, I just think it looks too much like KT is just picking up her T-Mobile phone and selecting committees like she selects her "five."



Perhaps they need to start with a plan to select the people who will be planning the plan.
Title: Swirling 'bout the bowl.....imho
Post by: waterboy on September 14, 2007, 09:57:19 AM
quote:
Originally posted by Rico

quote:
Originally posted by swake

quote:
Originally posted by cks511

http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx?articleID=070913_1__Mayor00288



And here begins the efforts of the bait and switch crowd,

They didn't want vision 2025, they wanted the river, now they don't want the river they want streets, now here is a plan to improved streets nd it's already a piece of crap swirling in a bowl. My guess will be this round they will cry the money should be spent on cops instead of streets. Lets see if I'm right.

What they really don't want is a government that uses taxes, at all.



I don't get that from the post or the thread title Mister Swake...

Many have been saying that they want the streets fixed before the "river"...

How convenient that they hold a press conference regarding a plan to fix the streets..



That being said, I will reserve judgment on the "street" plans until I hear more of the facts.

p.s. Rock the River is tonight and it's Free...
see you there..? Or be square...!



[}:)]



I was there. I was the square. Lots and lots of young people. And beer.
Title: Swirling 'bout the bowl.....imho
Post by: swake on September 14, 2007, 10:11:33 AM
quote:
Originally posted by MichaelBates

quote:
Originally posted by swake

Like Waterboy pointed out, the misogyny in some quarters in this town is stiking.


Look, a woman doing something, get her!




Women in public life are immune from criticism? The guy didn't say, "A woman? Holy crap, we're doomed." He said, "Sharon King Davis? Holy crap, we're doomed."

Misogyny? I suspect most of the people who complain about Kathy Taylor and Randi Miller could give you a long list of female politicians whom they have supported, even when running against male politicians in the same party. I certainly can:

I campaigned for State Rep. Pam Peterson in a 2004 primary where she ran against and handily defeated four male opponents.

After she beat me in a primary in 1998, I campaigned for Anna Falling for City Council, supported her again in 2000 (when some people were encouraging me to challenge her in a primary), and backed her in her primary and runoff for County Commissioner.

In 2002, I was involved with the campaigns of Denise Bode for AG and Dana Murphy for Corporation Commissioner, who both had tough primaries against male opponents.

In 2000 and 2002, I was involved with (hangs head in embarrassment) Randi Miller's campaigns  for City Council and County Commission.

I was involved with the campaigns of Brigitte Harper and Edith Shoals for State Senate and State House in north Tulsa, Sue Tibbs, and Nancy Riley (before she converted).

And like any good conservative, I'm a Margaret Thatcher fan.

Your misogyny charge is a baseless insult. It is an attempt to shut down any criticism of the actions or qualifications of an elected official or public figure who happens to be female and happens to agree with you.



Then why no complaint about Dewey?

The Snarky comment hit the woman only, again.

Title: Swirling 'bout the bowl.....imho
Post by: MichaelBates on September 14, 2007, 10:36:12 AM
quote:
Originally posted by swake



Then why no complaint about Dewey?

The Snarky comment hit the woman only, again.





So there's a kind of Title IX for snark?

I can't speak for the person who posted that comment, but I suspect it's because Davis has a much higher public profile than Bartlett at the moment. I'm not excited about either of them in charge of this effort, but at least Bartlett, as a former city elected official, has some claim to expertise.
Title: Swirling 'bout the bowl.....imho
Post by: sgrizzle on September 14, 2007, 10:44:30 AM
quote:
Originally posted by waterboy



I was there. I was the square. Lots and lots of young people. And beer.



I made a cameo as well, signed autographs, you know the drill.
Title: Swirling 'bout the bowl.....imho
Post by: swake on September 14, 2007, 11:12:55 AM
quote:
Originally posted by MichaelBates

quote:
Originally posted by swake



Then why no complaint about Dewey?

The Snarky comment hit the woman only, again.





So there's a kind of Title IX for snark?

I can't speak for the person who posted that comment, but I suspect it's because Davis has a much higher public profile than Bartlett at the moment. I'm not excited about either of them in charge of this effort, but at least Bartlett, as a former city elected official, has some claim to expertise.



Well,

I've met Sharon on a couple of occasions and know people that have worked with her and from what I can tell and from what I have heard from people I trust that have worked with her she is really impressive.

And so is Dewey Bartlett
Title: Swirling 'bout the bowl.....imho
Post by: pfox on September 14, 2007, 12:10:35 PM
How about former Streets Commissioner Bob Franden?

He was commissioner during the great Robert J. LaFortune's tenure.
Title: Swirling 'bout the bowl.....imho
Post by: MichaelBates on September 14, 2007, 01:49:44 PM
quote:
Originally posted by pfox

How about former Streets Commissioner Bob Franden?

He was commissioner during the great Robert J. LaFortune's tenure.



Except for Guy Hall and J. D. Metcalfe, every Street Commissioner from 1953 until the 1989 charter change is still living. Sid Patterson and Joe Coleman are the two that haven't been mentioned.