The Tulsa Forum by TulsaNow

Not At My Table - Political Discussions => National & International Politics => Topic started by: sgrizzle on August 12, 2007, 02:41:25 PM

Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: sgrizzle on August 12, 2007, 02:41:25 PM
Somehow I don't remember hearing about this beforehand:

http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx?articleID=070812_1_A10_hBack31257

quote:


Tulsa banker Tom Bennett, whose son Hank works for the Clinton campaign and whose wife, Sue, headed Saturday's fundraiser, said Clinton won some votes with her appearance.

"I think a lot came in not really decided," Bennett said. "Now they're decided."




So a lot of undecided voters turned out to a Clinton FUNDRAISER?

Sure, I'll give you money, but I'm not voting for you?
Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: waterboy on August 12, 2007, 04:37:17 PM
I also was surprised to hear that she had visited though I did see a lot of cars downtown yesterday evening that were no where near the Brady or Blue Dome area.

I guess the press just didn't have any space available or reporters due to the Tiger appreciation golf tournament.[;)]
Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: restored2x on August 13, 2007, 09:06:01 AM
Where's Obama?

Has he, or is he coming to Tulsa?
Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: Wrinkle on August 13, 2007, 09:27:24 AM
(http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/6425/hohumcl4.png)
Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: Conan71 on August 13, 2007, 10:01:45 AM
quote:
Originally posted by restored2x

Where's Obama?

Has he, or is he coming to Tulsa?



Obama was here a few months ago, hosted by George Kaiser.
Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: aoxamaxoa on August 13, 2007, 11:15:17 AM
^ Apparently, the smart money here is backing Obama...

Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: deinstein on August 13, 2007, 04:12:09 PM
I'm surprised this did not gather more local media coverage. We had both Tiger and Hillary in town. Sweet. We rule. For a day...eh, a few hours.
Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: aoxamaxoa on August 13, 2007, 04:50:31 PM
Hillary's not sweet.
Tiger is.....


Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: deinstein on August 14, 2007, 12:22:51 AM
I like Hillary.
Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: sgrizzle on August 14, 2007, 06:56:21 AM
I like pie.
Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: aoxamaxoa on August 14, 2007, 10:06:00 AM
I don't like Bushes and I am tired of Clinton's. The other one's, repugs, are just praying Hill gets the nod. She won't be swift boated. More like drop kicked.

I'd take Joe B, or Obama, or Edwards or even Rudy before I'd vote for another 4 years of the same old same old.

Hell, I'd vote for Ron Paul over Hillary just to avoid all the negativity.
Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: Hometown on August 14, 2007, 03:31:15 PM
Hillary is street smart
Mean as all get out
And it looks to me like she's going to be president

Personally, I could go for some peace and prosperity.

Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: aoxamaxoa on August 14, 2007, 04:00:34 PM
It will take two more Presidents and 8 more congress' before they can put humpty dumpty back together again.

If then....
Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: Double A on August 14, 2007, 04:18:53 PM
If Hillary is elected that would mean that two families will have controlled this country for most of my life, I won't be any part of that. I will not vote for her.                                        (http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p315/TYProle/2yl69nb.jpg)
Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: Chicken Little on August 14, 2007, 09:46:52 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Double A

I will not vote for her.                                        
Hypothetical:  Hillary vs Rudy...who would you vote for?
Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: sgrizzle on August 15, 2007, 08:09:15 AM
Very hypothetical.

Two ways I look at it, this race is a 4th quarter up by 70point game for the Dems. They can put in their unlikely players (Hillary and Obama) and maybe get them through. However, if they went with a white male (like every president previous) they couldn't lose.

Not being racist, just know there are a lot of people who aren't willing to elect a minority or a woman.
Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: Hometown on August 15, 2007, 01:15:29 PM
You better believe the Republicans will up the ante once again with a new chapter for the dirty tricks book.  Edwards doesn't have the team that can get him past the Republican machine.  It's a shame he has already done the V.P. thing.  How about Graham from Florida as Clinton's running mate?  Or possibly Richardson as V.P. to capture the Latin vote in the West.

There have been some changes over recent years that have lessened the importance of the south in a presidential race.

Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: YoungTulsan on August 15, 2007, 02:04:36 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Hometown

There have been some changes over recent years that have lessened the importance of the south in a presidential race.


The recent years I recall (1992, 1996, 2000, 2004) happened to be Arkansas and Texas governors winning.  That being said, I don't know if they neccesarily won BECAUSE of the Southerner vote.  Aside from Texas and Florida, the South holds very little electoral weight.  Presidential candidates have always made it pretty clear how little Oklahoma matters (aside from dropping into town for some quick campaign cash)

I'm not sure what crazy trick the Dems or Republicans will resort to this cycle.  The gay marriage thing was very clever, and indeed, a very dirty trick, in the '04 elections.  No one really cared to ban gay marriage or expected the bans to pass, but putting the question on the general election ballot got just enough religious conservatives to turn out and push Bush over the top.
Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: Hometown on August 15, 2007, 02:13:40 PM
True YoungTulsan, and I don't like to take risks on something this important.

But the rust belt had been trending to Republican and now it is trending to Democrat.  Same with parts of the North East.

Looks like the Democrats have some new strong holds.

Of course, I want the south too.  But more than that I want to win.

Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: iplaw on August 15, 2007, 02:19:58 PM
Not to be a wet blanket on your '08 basement geek party, but we're going to see an election as close, if not closer than we saw in '04.  Anyone who thinks the diehard masses that actually get out and vote are going to somehow magically switch sides is just in fantasy land.

Despite what you see now, the election, as far as the average joe is concerned may as well be 10 years off if it's more than 2 months away...so whatever polls are being conducted are completely worthless.
Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: Hometown on August 15, 2007, 02:26:01 PM
Oh, some noise from my country cousin.

Republicans are going to pull some dirty tricks.  Oh my.  Do you think I'm surprised?

Like I said, Hillary was the one that would call the IRS on her enemies and have the Secret Service rough up hecklers.  The girl knows how to fight on your level.  She's had practice.

Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: iplaw on August 15, 2007, 02:35:18 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Hometown


Like I said, Hillary was the one that would call the IRS on her enemies and have the Secret Service rough up hecklers.  The girl knows how to fight on your level.  She's had practice.

She won't be the nominee if the Dems have anything left rattling around in that collective empty skull of theirs they call the DNC.  Obama doesn't stand a chance after he's been put through the Clinton flabby armed spanking machine of Begala and Carville.  Hopefully they just fall on each other's swords so it's nice and clean for the rest of us wipe up the mess from this spectacle.
Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: Hometown on August 15, 2007, 02:42:39 PM
Right and you predicted a Republican sweep last fall.  What's in the water there in the sticks?

Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: Conan71 on August 15, 2007, 02:48:47 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Hometown

You better believe the Republicans will up the ante once again with a new chapter for the dirty tricks book.  Edwards doesn't have the team that can get him past the Republican machine.  It's a shame he has already done the V.P. thing.  How about Graham from Florida as Clinton's running mate?  Or possibly Richardson as V.P. to capture the Latin vote in the West.

There have been some changes over recent years that have lessened the importance of the south in a presidential race.





What geographic area of the United States does Florida belong to?
Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: aoxamaxoa on August 15, 2007, 02:56:23 PM
Hill will be the nominee cinching the repugs hold on the White House.
Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: YoungTulsan on August 15, 2007, 03:25:30 PM
quote:
Originally posted by aoxamaxoa

Hill will be the nominee cinching the repugs hold on the White House.



Primary momentum is strange though.  No one really expected Kerry to pull off the nomination in 04 until some early wins turned into momentum.

Hillary is definately known by everyone, so she gets good numbers in these early polls of people who are basically unaware of the other candidates (aside from the 1% of the population that watched the debates thus far)

The campaigns will heat up close to the primaries, people will start learning about all of the candidates, and democrats will REALLY start to worry about whether she is electable in the general election.  Her negatives will be played up very strong by her opponents in the days before the primaries.

It still seems more likely than not, Hillary will coast through this.  But I see a possibility of Edwards or Obama pulling it off.

VP options:
Hillary will play second fiddle to no one
Edwards will not get the VP spot 2 elections in a row
Obama will have gotten too beaten up by Hillary to run as her VP

Hillary wins, Richardson seems like the logical choice for VP with Edwards and Obama not an option.

Edwards wins, it would probably be an Edwards/Obama ticket.

Obama wins, you rule out Hillary just because, Edwards as well.  Richardson?  Sounds bad but I don't know if they would run an all-minority ticket.  He'd need a VP that would attract some more moderates to get the general election win.  Maybe a white, rural state, democrat governor with good approval numbers?  We got one of those here :D
Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: Double A on August 15, 2007, 06:06:27 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Chicken Little

quote:
Originally posted by Double A

I will not vote for her.                                        
Hypothetical:  Hillary vs Rudy...who would you vote for?

None of the Above. If there is a good third party or independent candidate, I might cast my protest vote for them. Otherwise, I'll leave it blank.
Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: Double A on August 15, 2007, 06:16:28 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Hometown

You better believe the Republicans will up the ante once again with a new chapter for the dirty tricks book.  Edwards doesn't have the team that can get him past the Republican machine.  It's a shame he has already done the V.P. thing.  How about Graham from Florida as Clinton's running mate?  Or possibly Richardson as V.P. to capture the Latin vote in the West.

There have been some changes over recent years that have lessened the importance of the south in a presidential race.



Clinton/Richardson? Bill Maher was on T.V. wondering how Democrats will lose this election. I think you just answered his question.
Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: Double A on August 15, 2007, 06:26:16 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Hometown

Oh, some noise from my country cousin.

Republicans are going to pull some dirty tricks.  Oh my.  Do you think I'm surprised?

Like I said, Hillary was the one that would call the IRS on her enemies and have the Secret Service rough up hecklers.  The girl knows how to fight on your level.  She's had practice.



                                                 So just to recap, Hillary is just as dirty as Republicans, engages in the politics of personal destruction and abused her power as First Lady, huh? That should really appeal to Democratic primary voters in her campaign for President. Good luck with that.
Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: deinstein on August 15, 2007, 08:11:55 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Conan71

quote:
Originally posted by Hometown

You better believe the Republicans will up the ante once again with a new chapter for the dirty tricks book.  Edwards doesn't have the team that can get him past the Republican machine.  It's a shame he has already done the V.P. thing.  How about Graham from Florida as Clinton's running mate?  Or possibly Richardson as V.P. to capture the Latin vote in the West.

There have been some changes over recent years that have lessened the importance of the south in a presidential race.





What geographic area of the United States does Florida belong to?



The race came down to precincts in South Florida...which is totally different from north Florida.

But to say the South isn't important is absolutely hysterical.
Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: deinstein on August 15, 2007, 08:12:57 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Double A

quote:
Originally posted by Chicken Little

quote:
Originally posted by Double A

I will not vote for her.                                        
Hypothetical:  Hillary vs Rudy...who would you vote for?

None of the Above. If there is a good third party or independent candidate, I might cast my protest vote for them. Otherwise, I'll leave it blank.



Then your ballot is invalid, at least that's what they told me last time I voted.
Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: iplaw on August 15, 2007, 08:53:06 PM
quote:
Originally posted by deinstein

quote:
Originally posted by Conan71

quote:
Originally posted by Hometown

You better believe the Republicans will up the ante once again with a new chapter for the dirty tricks book.  Edwards doesn't have the team that can get him past the Republican machine.  It's a shame he has already done the V.P. thing.  How about Graham from Florida as Clinton's running mate?  Or possibly Richardson as V.P. to capture the Latin vote in the West.

There have been some changes over recent years that have lessened the importance of the south in a presidential race.





What geographic area of the United States does Florida belong to?



The race came down to precincts in South Florida...which is totally different from north Florida.

But to say the South isn't important is absolutely hysterical.

Re-read the post by HT there champ, and you'll see the point he was making.  Florida is a southern state.
Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: Double A on August 15, 2007, 09:13:10 PM
quote:
Originally posted by deinstein

quote:
Originally posted by Double A

quote:
Originally posted by Chicken Little

quote:
Originally posted by Double A

I will not vote for her.                                        
Hypothetical:  Hillary vs Rudy...who would you vote for?

None of the Above. If there is a good third party or independent candidate, I might cast my protest vote for them. Otherwise, I'll leave it blank.



Then your ballot is invalid, at least that's what they told me last time I voted.

They told you wrong.
Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: Conan71 on August 16, 2007, 02:20:25 PM
quote:
Originally posted by YoungTulsan

Obama will have gotten too beaten up by Hillary to run as her VP




There is precedent for this:

Reagan/Bush in 1980.  They had a very contentious primary campaign.

However, Hillary is smart smug enough to realize that she doesn't need Obama to get a healthy portion of the black vote.  Wouldn't really hurt her campaign in the general election with or without Obama.  She might be better off without him.
Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: YoungTulsan on August 16, 2007, 02:25:25 PM
I know what they could call the ticket if Obama ran with our Governor:

(http://static.flickr.com/81/242396743_7c138548db.jpg)
Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: Moderator on August 16, 2007, 02:56:05 PM
Many of the above replies have been deleted. Please attempt to refrain from name-calling.
Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: Conan71 on August 16, 2007, 03:00:15 PM
Thanks, the lamb/Jethro thing was just too nauseating. [;)]
Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: Hometown on August 16, 2007, 03:47:32 PM
YoungTulsan, the Republicans and Democrats are in this death struggle trying to capture the Latin vote and Governor Henry became damaged goods once he signed 1804.

Graham out of Florida is my favorite for VP in a play for the Southern vote.

Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: Kenosha on August 17, 2007, 09:20:13 AM
quote:
Originally posted by sgrizzle

I like pie.



I love lamp.
Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: Kenosha on August 17, 2007, 09:20:46 AM
quote:
Originally posted by Chicken Little

quote:
Originally posted by Double A

I will not vote for her.                                        
Hypothetical:  Hillary vs Rudy...who would you vote for?



Lamp.
Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: deinstein on August 17, 2007, 08:59:20 PM
quote:
Originally posted by iplaw

quote:
Originally posted by deinstein

quote:
Originally posted by Conan71

quote:
Originally posted by Hometown

You better believe the Republicans will up the ante once again with a new chapter for the dirty tricks book.  Edwards doesn't have the team that can get him past the Republican machine.  It's a shame he has already done the V.P. thing.  How about Graham from Florida as Clinton's running mate?  Or possibly Richardson as V.P. to capture the Latin vote in the West.

There have been some changes over recent years that have lessened the importance of the south in a presidential race.





What geographic area of the United States does Florida belong to?



The race came down to precincts in South Florida...which is totally different from north Florida.

But to say the South isn't important is absolutely hysterical.

Re-read the post by HT there champ, and you'll see the point he was making.  Florida is a southern state.



Reread my post. South Florida is not southern by any means. It's a bunch of transplants, etc. There is a huge difference between the type of voters in Jacksonville and Miami.
Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: iplaw on August 20, 2007, 08:24:14 AM
quote:
Originally posted by deinstein

quote:
Originally posted by iplaw

quote:
Originally posted by deinstein

quote:
Originally posted by Conan71

quote:
Originally posted by Hometown

You better believe the Republicans will up the ante once again with a new chapter for the dirty tricks book.  Edwards doesn't have the team that can get him past the Republican machine.  It's a shame he has already done the V.P. thing.  How about Graham from Florida as Clinton's running mate?  Or possibly Richardson as V.P. to capture the Latin vote in the West.

There have been some changes over recent years that have lessened the importance of the south in a presidential race.





What geographic area of the United States does Florida belong to?



The race came down to precincts in South Florida...which is totally different from north Florida.

But to say the South isn't important is absolutely hysterical.

Re-read the post by HT there champ, and you'll see the point he was making.  Florida is a southern state.



Reread my post. South Florida is not southern by any means. It's a bunch of transplants, etc. There is a huge difference between the type of voters in Jacksonville and Miami.

What geographical region is Florida in duh-einstein?
Title: Hillary in Tulsa
Post by: rwarn17588 on August 20, 2007, 10:41:14 AM
Hmmm. I guess all those Southern accents I heard down there were all fake. [}:)]