Okay Alt and Troofers. How do you counter this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cddIgb1nGJ8
That sounds a lot like science and fact - they aren't interested.
But, but, but what about that one hotel in spain that one time?
ok this video is great, it raises interesting questions....but why does the 9/11 commission totally dismiss the CORE COLUMNS as if they didn't exist? They refered to them as a "Hollow Center Shaft".... plus this is a great replica of the IMPACT..but NOT what happened afterwards...
the University website stated that it took some 9 months to construct and test this model and they were working on the next phase - collapse. It requires programming the physics of fire on steel - extensive work with their metallurgy school etc.
It will be interesting to see what they find out.
quote:
Originally posted by altruismsuffers
ok this video is great, it raises interesting questions....but why does the 9/11 commission totally dismiss the CORE COLUMNS as if they didn't exist? They refered to them as a "Hollow Center Shaft".... plus this is a great replica of the IMPACT..but NOT what happened afterwards...
Because the 9/11 commission deferred to the engineering reports instead of reguritating them, but we've been over this before. The 9/11 commission also didn't bother the report the direction from whence the sun came up every day either...does that suffice as a conspiracy?
quote:
Originally posted by altruismsuffers
ok this video is great....plus this is a great replica of the IMPACT..
So you agree that planes hit the buildings!
quote:
Originally posted by swake
quote:
Originally posted by altruismsuffers
ok this video is great....plus this is a great replica of the IMPACT..
So you agree that planes hit the buildings!
lol
quote:
Originally posted by cannon_fodder
the University website stated that it took some 9 months to construct and test this model and they were working on the next phase - collapse. It requires programming the physics of fire on steel - extensive work with their metallurgy school etc.
It will be interesting to see what they find out.
Yes it will be interesting because of all the tests NIST did they could barely get the model to fail and even then it was still a highly unprobable collapse.
quote:
Originally posted by altruismsuffers
quote:
Originally posted by cannon_fodder
the University website stated that it took some 9 months to construct and test this model and they were working on the next phase - collapse. It requires programming the physics of fire on steel - extensive work with their metallurgy school etc.
It will be interesting to see what they find out.
Yes it will be interesting because of all the tests NIST did they could barely get the model to fail and even then it was still a highly unprobable collapse.
(http://iambossy.typepad.com/i_am_bossy/images/phil_spector_la10305232138_1.jpg)
"Is that hair gel"
quote:
Originally posted by MichaelC
quote:
Originally posted by swake
quote:
Originally posted by altruismsuffers
ok this video is great....plus this is a great replica of the IMPACT..
So you agree that planes hit the buildings!
lol
Ditto the lol. At least it's a start
quote:
Yes it will be interesting because of all the tests NIST did they could barely get the model to fail and even then it was still a highly unprobable collapse.
Evidence please.
Pick a thread already. How about this one?http://www.tulsanow.org/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=6826