http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-02-25-sex-offender-laws-cover_x.htm
Lucky Lamons makes USA Today.
Lucky is right about this one. Public urination needs to be separated from the real sex crimes. We need to worry about high-risk offenders.
Agreed.
quote:
Originally posted by Chicken Little
Lucky is right about this one. Public urination needs to be separated from the real sex crimes. We need to worry about high-risk offenders.
What do you define as high risk?I define rapist,child molesters/rapist, those who attempt sex to have sex with children as high risk and those who seek to sexual harm children in any other way as high risk.
quote:
Originally posted by jamesrage
quote:
Originally posted by Chicken Little
Lucky is right about this one. Public urination needs to be separated from the real sex crimes. We need to worry about high-risk offenders.
What do you define as high risk?I define rapist,child molesters/rapist, those who attempt sex to have sex with children as high risk and those who seek to sexual harm children in any other way as high risk.
A drunk who gets caught peeing on a bush can be placed on the sex offender list. Keeping track of these guys steals resources that should be dedicated to tracking high-risk offenders. This is a stupid rule that needs to change.
My definition of "high-risk" is the same as yours, and Lucky's for that matter.