The Tulsa Forum by TulsaNow

Not At My Table - Political Discussions => National & International Politics => Topic started by: tim huntzinger on October 28, 2006, 10:05:00 AM

Title: Did Worman get 'owned'? If so, by whom?
Post by: tim huntzinger on October 28, 2006, 10:05:00 AM
http://www.wortmanforcongress.com (//%22http://www.wortmanforcongress.com%22)

{WARNING: 'F' bomb drops at end of flash animation.  May contain images that are unsuitable to sensitive viewers.)
Title: Did Worman get 'owned'? If so, by whom?
Post by: Cubs on October 28, 2006, 01:07:46 PM
ok, that's just stupid
Title: Did Worman get 'owned'? If so, by whom?
Post by: papaspot on October 28, 2006, 01:37:53 PM
DAMN that was annoying.
Title: Did Worman get 'owned'? If so, by whom?
Post by: waterboy on October 28, 2006, 01:38:49 PM
Can somebody 'splain to me pancakes that was about?
Title: Did Worman get 'owned'? If so, by whom?
Post by: papaspot on October 28, 2006, 01:42:20 PM
I dunno but my grandpa passed over forty some-odd years ago and I swear I heard him say, "Turn that crap down!"
Title: Did Worman get 'owned'? If so, by whom?
Post by: snopes on October 28, 2006, 01:49:51 PM
That was about as weird as it gets.
Title: Did Worman get 'owned'? If so, by whom?
Post by: papaspot on October 28, 2006, 01:54:15 PM
Yo! Tim! Whawuzat??
Title: Did Worman get 'owned'? If so, by whom?
Post by: tim huntzinger on October 29, 2006, 06:59:26 AM
IMO one of Sullivan's (PBUH) goons (probably the same Chief of Staff that was helping Mayor LaFoturne politically) set this up as a phoney 'hack' site to illustrate Wortman's incompetence.  Dems are counting on a 15-20% Wortman vote in the general for Gentges (sp) to win.  If the race were closer I would suspect that the site would have an appalling amount of negative material about Wortman.

Wortman, of course, initiated his '04 primary campaign agin Sullivan (PBUH) with some vicious gossip about Prince John (PBUH).  Sullivan (PBUH) denounced negative campaigning after his victory.  Hopefully someone will track this hack site to Sullivan (PBUH) and remind voters of his words in '08.
Title: Did Worman get 'owned'? If so, by whom?
Post by: waterboy on October 29, 2006, 08:44:14 AM
Okay...What is PBUH? And one wonders why this link is put here? Are you a Gentges supporter, a Sullivan opponent, a Wortman supporter or just enjoy strange techy dirty tricks?
Title: Did Worman get 'owned'? If so, by whom?
Post by: si_uk_lon_ok on October 29, 2006, 09:03:51 AM
quote:
Originally posted by waterboy

Okay...What is PBUH? And one wonders why this link is put here? Are you a Gentges supporter, a Sullivan opponent, a Wortman supporter or just enjoy strange techy dirty tricks?



PBUH normally means peace be upon him. It normally is used by muslims who say mohamed, then peace be upon him.

The use in that post was a little wierd. I'm guessing he is a sullivan supporter trying to scare people into voting for sullivan rather than wortman.
Title: Did Worman get 'owned'? If so, by whom?
Post by: Double A on October 29, 2006, 03:38:05 PM
C'mon Sully's got this one in the bag. He should send a personal thank you letter to the Democratic leadership in the first congressional district for  recruiting a open border/amnesty advocate loser candidate like Gentges.
Title: Did Worman get 'owned'? If so, by whom?
Post by: RecycleMichael on October 29, 2006, 04:44:20 PM
Gee DoubleA.

Have you ever supported a democrat that ever won a primary?

Your attack and slander ways aren't doing democrats any favors. Are you a closet republican?
Title: Did Worman get 'owned'? If so, by whom?
Post by: Double A on October 29, 2006, 05:32:19 PM
quote:
Originally posted by recyclemichael

Gee DoubleA.

Have you ever supported a democrat that ever won a primary?

Your attack and slander ways aren't doing democrats any favors. Are you a closet republican?



Just upholding the platform of the Tulsa County Democratic Party and CD1 Democratic Party. It cleary states that we as a party oppose illegal immigration. I support Democrats that support the platform of the Democratic party in the area they wish to represent instead of the elitist big business agendas of the Washington limosine liberal advocacy groups they fund to promote open borders and amnesty as a source of cheap labor to pad their pockets. I'd rather get raped by Republicans as expected than get date raped by Democrats who show more concern for illegal aliens than they do their fellow Americans. Why should I support a candidate who blatantly disregards the sovereignty of our country and completely disrespects the rights and responsibilities of citizenship? I prefer elected officials that will make decisions about the future and security of this country without seeking the approval of corrupt foreign goverments.
Title: Did Worman get 'owned'? If so, by whom?
Post by: tim huntzinger on October 30, 2006, 10:25:50 AM
H20, I am not an opponent of the Right Honorable Sullivan because I have not declared my intentions to run for Congress. [:)]  I supported Wortman in 04 but since he has not seen fit to ask for my support, I will be voting Gentses - he did not seem like an American-hating globalist when I shook his hand
Saturday.  RH Sully, however, wore dark glasses to avoid eye contact.

While I find the sequence amusing, the tactic is pathetic.  I am shocked, SHOCKED I tell you, that anyone associated with the RH Sullivan  would drop the F bomb.
Title: Did Worman get 'owned'? If so, by whom?
Post by: Conan71 on October 30, 2006, 10:41:21 AM
That's totally bizarre.  I guess I'm just a little too obtuse to get it.[xx(]
Title: Did Worman get 'owned'? If so, by whom?
Post by: RecycleMichael on October 30, 2006, 01:29:04 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Double A
I'd rather get raped by Republicans as expected than get date raped by Democrats...


You are so over the top, it is comical.