This would be the first interchange of its kind (Diverging Diamond Interchange (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diverging_diamond_interchange)) in Tulsa and only the second in the state (I think OKC has one on deck too but the only one currently in operation seems to be in Elk City).
Pertinent info: https://us64us169.transportationplanroom.com/
Sounds great, but also seems like it will freak out some south Tulsa drivers.
Quote from: swake on July 10, 2021, 11:13:43 AM
Sounds great, but also seems like it will freak out some south Tulsa drivers.
It freaked me out driving the one in Springfield several years ago, but it actually makes sense once you drive on it. But with my experience with Tulsa drivers yesterday, it doesn't give me much hope...
this is a little better map with the current configuration using an overlay.
https://garver.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=6eb36e437292482fbe744aac1a481dd2
ADOT built a Diverging Diamond Interchange that opened last year. Made a huge difference in the traffic flow from the old roundabouts that were there. The roundabouts were built 20 years ago but were quickly overloaded in just a few years.
https://azdot.gov/projects/central-district-projects/i-17-ti-reconstruction-happy-valley-rd-and-pinnacle-peak-rd/happy-valley-rd (https://azdot.gov/projects/central-district-projects/i-17-ti-reconstruction-happy-valley-rd-and-pinnacle-peak-rd/happy-valley-rd)
If it works the state needs to build one at 71st and 169, the traffic at that interchange is even worse.
Quote from: swake on July 10, 2021, 12:39:49 PM
If it works the state needs to build one at 71st and 169, the traffic at that interchange is even worse.
I was a little surprised this wouldn't be the first one. But the Creek/Memorial interchange is bad enough.
Quote from: Hoss on July 10, 2021, 01:42:22 PM
I was a little surprised this wouldn't be the first one. But the Creek/Memorial interchange is bad enough.
I believe this is the type of interchange they have in Norman at I-35 and Main, and maybe Lindsey too.
Quote from: AdamsHall on July 10, 2021, 04:18:40 PM
I believe this is the type of interchange they have in Norman at I-35 and Main, and maybe Lindsey too.
Those are different. Here is the one at Lindsey & I-35
https://goo.gl/maps/o1dmCkxU9TGoqt1p6 (https://goo.gl/maps/o1dmCkxU9TGoqt1p6)
I-17 through Phoenix has a lot of those types of interchanges because they can fit it smaller areas.
I-17 & Northern
https://goo.gl/maps/1wHZuo7AJvhfWkAfA (https://goo.gl/maps/1wHZuo7AJvhfWkAfA)
Quote from: dbacksfan 2.0 on July 10, 2021, 06:35:14 PM
Those are different. Here is the one at Lindsey & I-35
https://goo.gl/maps/o1dmCkxU9TGoqt1p6 (https://goo.gl/maps/o1dmCkxU9TGoqt1p6)
I-17 through Phoenix has a lot of those types of interchanges because they can fit it smaller areas.
I-17 & Northern
https://goo.gl/maps/1wHZuo7AJvhfWkAfA (https://goo.gl/maps/1wHZuo7AJvhfWkAfA)
It's not Lindsey in Norman, it's Main, but it's different again, and does all the traffic with a single light.
https://www.google.com/maps/place/I-35+Industrial+Park/@35.2184084,-97.4859664,194m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x0:0x78be9b62099c9a20!8m2!3d35.217315!4d-97.4955902
There's no room on Memorial to do anything like Main in Norman.
Quote from: swake on July 10, 2021, 07:28:22 PM
There's no room on Memorial to do anything like Main in Norman.
Memorial from (at least) 121st to 91 is always a mess. I am beginning to think that no one in Bixby has a job due to traffic most of the day. They are just out driving around.
I know the urbanistas like congestion and deplore alternate routes but Memorial is a mess. There is only one way from downtown Bixby north, Memorial/US 64. "Alternates" are Peoria/Elm though Jenks or OK 72 through Coweta. That was sorta OK 50 years ago but not so much now.
Before I retired, traffic on Memorial from 111th to the Creek was OK,
at 6AM. By 6:30 it was getting busy.
Bixby is trying to maximize its tax collections by allowing apartment complexes and other high density development per the urbanista mantra but not paying attention to simple things like getting around. There are windows of opportunity to get through Memorial. They are somewhere around 10:30 AM, 3 PM and from about 10 PM to 6 AM. :(
Quote from: Red Arrow on July 10, 2021, 09:22:36 PM
Memorial from (at least) 121st to 91 is always a mess. I am beginning to think that no one in Bixby has a job due to traffic most of the day. They are just out driving around.
I know the urbanistas like congestion and deplore alternate routes but Memorial is a mess. There is only one way from downtown Bixby north, Memorial/US 64. "Alternates" are Peoria/Elm though Jenks or OK 72 through Coweta. That was sorta OK 50 years ago but not so much now.
Before I retired, traffic on Memorial from 111th to the Creek was OK, at 6AM. By 6:30 it was getting busy.
Bixby is trying to maximize its tax collections by allowing apartment complexes and other high density development per the urbanista mantra but not paying attention to simple things like getting around. There are windows of opportunity to get through Memorial. They are somewhere around 10:30 AM, 3 PM and from about 10 PM to 6 AM. :(
The Gilcrease turnpike under construction never made sense to me, it should have been built a mile or two west of Memorial from the Creek down to at least 151st.
Quote from: swake on July 10, 2021, 09:28:12 PM
The Gilcrease turnpike under construction never made sense to me, it should have been built a mile or two west of Memorial from the Creek down to at least 151st.
Two miles west of Memorial is Yale. The right of way for Yale is wide enough for 4 lanes but the rich folks there don't want a bridge over the river.
Quote from: Red Arrow on July 10, 2021, 10:29:30 PM
Two miles west of Memorial is Yale. The right of way for Yale is wide enough for 4 lanes but the rich folks there don't want a bridge over the river.
Sorry, I meant east.
Quote from: swake on July 10, 2021, 10:45:15 PM
Sorry, I meant east.
Oh, the other west. I've done that before.
Two miles east would be Garnett. That would probably have nothing to do with the Gilcrease but may have been a part of the Creek at one time.
Quote from: dbacksfan 2.0 on July 10, 2021, 12:08:40 PM
ADOT built a Diverging Diamond Interchange that opened last year. Made a huge difference in the traffic flow from the old roundabouts that were there. The roundabouts were built 20 years ago but were quickly overloaded in just a few years.
https://azdot.gov/projects/central-district-projects/i-17-ti-reconstruction-happy-valley-rd-and-pinnacle-peak-rd/happy-valley-rd (https://azdot.gov/projects/central-district-projects/i-17-ti-reconstruction-happy-valley-rd-and-pinnacle-peak-rd/happy-valley-rd)
Very cool.
Quote from: Red Arrow on July 10, 2021, 10:29:30 PM
Two miles west of Memorial is Yale. The right of way for Yale is wide enough for 4 lanes but the rich folks there don't want a bridge over the river.
Seems Tulsa could use a north-south express route between Riverside and Sheridan --- Could Yale be done similar to Metcalf in KC/Overland Park. Fewer big intersection stops with service road business and side street access on each side of Yale --- antiquated? 15th to 81st OR 31st to 81st any good?
Quote from: dbacksfan 2.0 on July 10, 2021, 12:08:40 PM
ADOT built a Diverging Diamond Interchange that opened last year. Made a huge difference in the traffic flow from the old roundabouts that were there. The roundabouts were built 20 years ago but were quickly overloaded in just a few years.
https://azdot.gov/projects/central-district-projects/i-17-ti-reconstruction-happy-valley-rd-and-pinnacle-peak-rd/happy-valley-rd (https://azdot.gov/projects/central-district-projects/i-17-ti-reconstruction-happy-valley-rd-and-pinnacle-peak-rd/happy-valley-rd)
What do we have at the I-44, U.S. 75 interchange just west of the river?
Quote from: dbacksfan 2.0 on July 10, 2021, 06:35:14 PM
Those are different. Here is the one at Lindsey & I-35
https://goo.gl/maps/o1dmCkxU9TGoqt1p6 (https://goo.gl/maps/o1dmCkxU9TGoqt1p6)
I-17 through Phoenix has a lot of those types of interchanges because they can fit it smaller areas.
I-17 & Northern
https://goo.gl/maps/1wHZuo7AJvhfWkAfA (https://goo.gl/maps/1wHZuo7AJvhfWkAfA)
That type of intersection is known as an SPUI (Single Point Urban Interchange) (http://"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-point_urban_interchange")
That type of intersection is good for newly designed bridges or updated bridges, as the requirement for a large bridge deck comes into play. Using the DDI in this instance makes sense because little interchange reconfiguration is required compared to what might be needed for an SPUI. Since the exit here exits at grade (where the expressway crosses over the arterial) it would take too much work to convert that into an SPUI.
The DDI seems to be the best solution for the Creek Turnpike/Memorial Dr. interchange. The reconstruction will take a little while, but the end result will be worth it. As others have pointed out the bigger problem is north and south of it. I don't know what would fix that. My opinion, rip out those little center median strips, make 3 lanes of traffic each direction and put a continuous center turn lane down the middle.
Quote from: dbacksfan 2.0 on July 11, 2021, 01:02:01 PM
The DDI seems to be the best solution for the Creek Turnpike/Memorial Dr. interchange. The reconstruction will take a little while, but the end result will be worth it. As others have pointed out the bigger problem is north and south of it. I don't know what would fix that. My opinion, rip out those little center median strips, make 3 lanes of traffic each direction and put a continuous center turn lane down the middle.
Memorial is 3 lanes in each direction from just south of the Creek to 111th. The abrupt end southbound at 111th where the inside lane becomes a left turn only lane causes some interesting traffic dynamics. There should be some better signage to indicate the left turn only. Longer left turn lanes for northbound traffic at 111th, 101st, the Creek and at 91st would help since the present ones fill up and block through traffic. I don't think there is enough room for another lane under the Creek.
https://goo.gl/maps/GCjS6xeB7jaAsZiEA Go to street view to look under the bridges. I can't get Google Maps to share a link in street view.
A continuous center turn lane would be a mistake, in my opinion. It would invite drivers in both directions to take the center lane well before their turn with predictable standoffs. Also, limiting the number of places to turn left across 3 lanes of traffic without a traffic light is a good thing. We don't need any more traffic lights along this stretch. Next time you're here, stop by this area most any time during daylight hours to see the crazy things drivers do in this area.
Quote from: Red Arrow on July 11, 2021, 04:11:26 PM
Memorial is 3 lanes in each direction from just south of the Creek to 111th. The abrupt end southbound at 111th where the inside lane becomes a left turn only lane causes some interesting traffic dynamics. There should be some better signage to indicate the left turn only. Longer left turn lanes for northbound traffic at 111th, 101st, the Creek and at 91st would help since the present ones fill up and block through traffic. I don't think there is enough room for another lane under the Creek.
https://goo.gl/maps/GCjS6xeB7jaAsZiEA Go to street view to look under the bridges. I can't get Google Maps to share a link in street view.
A continuous center turn lane would be a mistake, in my opinion. It would invite drivers in both directions to take the center lane well before their turn with predictable standoffs. Also, limiting the number of places to turn left across 3 lanes of traffic without a traffic light is a good thing. We don't need any more traffic lights along this stretch. Next time you're here, stop by this area most any time during daylight hours to see the crazy things drivers do in this area.
I looked at the street view where Memorial goes under the Creek after reading about the DDI. I was thinking more of from the Creek south for the center turn lane, but yeah I get trying to teach Tulsa drivers something new. I'm just so used to the center turn lane from living out here for so long.
I've actually been back three times, Nov '17/Nov '19 and March '20 was the most recent and have driven out in that area. I have a nephew that lives at roughly 151st and Yale in McMansionville. They can't understand why I stay downtown instead of with them or in that area. Last trip I went to watch his son play in a baseball tourney out at Indian Springs Baseball complex. After one trip down Memorial I started taking the Beeline out to 151st and then over to Yale.
I actually drove from Phoenix to Tulsa and back in March of '20 and was reminded of how people drive the minute I crossed from Texas into Oklahoma on I-40.
If you really want to confuse people, make a street six lanes wide, two going south, three going north with a center turn lane in between. Now, make the center turn lane a reverse lane during rush hour.
https://goo.gl/maps/5BTHg2N4tx116XfQ8 (https://goo.gl/maps/5BTHg2N4tx116XfQ8)
Is this just horrible reporting by someone that has no clue about the info they've been given or is this accurate? They will run Memorial over the top of the Creek?
QuoteSo ODOT is proposing a new type of interchange: the diverging diamond.
It'll mean Memorial will go over the Creek Turnpike, and drivers will cross over to the other lane before crossing back to the right side, with stoplights to direct traffic. The idea is to eliminate left turns to make people safer.
https://www.newson6.com/story/60ec9650c67a1e0bee9df184/diverging-diamond-interchange-proposed-for-creek-turnpike-memorial-drive-intersection (https://www.newson6.com/story/60ec9650c67a1e0bee9df184/diverging-diamond-interchange-proposed-for-creek-turnpike-memorial-drive-intersection)
Found my answer, Kristen Weaver didn't read the info from ODOT
QuoteODOT proposes to construct a Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI) at Memorial Drive (US-64) and the Creek Turnpike (US-64/US-169). This innovative interchange configuration enhances the operation of a traditional diamond by moving the arterial street traffic to the opposite side of the roadway at the on- and off-ramps. See More Information on Diverging Diamonds, for general information on this type of interchange.
For the Memorial Drive and Creek Turnpike interchange, ODOT wanted to improve the congestion without affecting adjacent properties. The proposed DDI at this location will be a "retrofit" meaning it will be constructed within the existing interchange footprint. The existing bridge on the Creek Turnpike over Memorial Drive will remain in place, and no additional right-of-way will be purchased. The adjacent multi-use trail and current sidewalk connectivity will be enhanced by providing signalized crosswalks throughout the interchange.
You can view details of the design on the Interactive map. More information is provided below.
https://us64us169.transportationplanroom.com/what-is-being-built (https://us64us169.transportationplanroom.com/what-is-being-built)
Quote from: dbacksfan 2.0 on July 13, 2021, 11:00:40 AM
Is this just horrible reporting by someone that has no clue about the info they've been given or is this accurate? They will run Memorial over the top of the Creek?
https://www.newson6.com/story/60ec9650c67a1e0bee9df184/diverging-diamond-interchange-proposed-for-creek-turnpike-memorial-drive-intersection (https://www.newson6.com/story/60ec9650c67a1e0bee9df184/diverging-diamond-interchange-proposed-for-creek-turnpike-memorial-drive-intersection)
Found my answer, Kristen Weaver didn't read the info from ODOT
https://us64us169.transportationplanroom.com/what-is-being-built (https://us64us169.transportationplanroom.com/what-is-being-built)
She probably got confused by the illustrations which would appear to have Memorial going over the Creek.
Quote from: Red Arrow on July 13, 2021, 01:46:02 PM
She probably got confused by the illustrations which would appear to have Memorial going over the Creek.
Kind of figured that. I have to remember that news stories and common sense don't always go together.
Someone mentioned the original highway plan for Tulsa and I found a map of Oklahoma from 1978 that shows the proposed routes at that time. I'll see if I can get a better scan of it later.
(https://photos.smugmug.com/photos/i-ZPKLDZQ/0/0bd0d732/X2/i-ZPKLDZQ-X2.jpg) (https://kevinallsop.smugmug.com/Misc-3/n-x46z7K/i-ZPKLDZQ/A)
Quote from: dbacksfan 2.0 on July 10, 2021, 06:35:14 PM
Those are different. Here is the one at Lindsey & I-35
https://goo.gl/maps/o1dmCkxU9TGoqt1p6 (https://goo.gl/maps/o1dmCkxU9TGoqt1p6)
I-17 through Phoenix has a lot of those types of interchanges because they can fit it smaller areas.
I-17 & Northern
https://goo.gl/maps/1wHZuo7AJvhfWkAfA (https://goo.gl/maps/1wHZuo7AJvhfWkAfA)
There is something that has the "look and feel" of DDI in St Louis Area, I-270 and Dorsett Road. Whatever it is, it is brilliant for traffic flow! Long overdue!!
And since it is such a great idea, OK will probably not do it.
Quote from: dbacksfan 2.0 on July 17, 2021, 02:54:53 PM
Someone mentioned the original highway plan for Tulsa and I found a map of Oklahoma from 1978 that shows the proposed routes at that time. I'll see if I can get a better scan of it later.
(https://photos.smugmug.com/photos/i-ZPKLDZQ/0/0bd0d732/X2/i-ZPKLDZQ-X2.jpg) (https://kevinallsop.smugmug.com/Misc-3/n-x46z7K/i-ZPKLDZQ/A)
I remember exiting I-44 at Memorial when our family moved here in 1971. We were a caravan of 3 cars, 2 pulling trailers, with walkie-talkie communications. On the way to 111th, I asked dad if we were still in Oklahoma. :-)
I drove thru one a couple times last week in Asheville and it worked well but was seriously strange the first time thru.
Quote from: dbacksfan 2.0 on July 13, 2021, 03:21:51 PM
Kind of figured that. I have to remember that news stories and common sense don't always go together.
With print media having immediate video on their websites, TV news shows are becoming less relevant.