The Tulsa Forum by TulsaNow

Talk About Tulsa => Other Tulsa Discussion => Topic started by: cannon_fodder on June 21, 2013, 02:28:54 PM

Title: Metro Jacksonville's review of Tulsa
Post by: cannon_fodder on June 21, 2013, 02:28:54 PM
I don't think this is a repeat, but Metro Jacksonville compares Tulsa and Jacksonville and then posts a ton of pictures and description of Tulsa.  Always interesting to see how others view us:

http://www.metrojacksonville.com/article/2012-nov-downtown-revitalization-tulsa

About Tulsa

Tulsa and Jacksonville share a common trait as early 20th century boom cities. Jacksonville rapidly grew into a southern metropolis with its population rising to 129,549 between the Great Fire of 1901 and 1930.  Across the country, Tulsa came to life after the area's first oil well was established in 1901. Known as the "Oil Capital of the World," Tulsa's population swelled to 141,258 between 1901 and 1930. The city's success in the energy industry promoted construction booms in the Art Deco style during the 1920s and 1930s.
. . . .

(due to the pictures being embedded, just click the link)

http://www.metrojacksonville.com/article/2012-nov-downtown-revitalization-tulsa (http://www.metrojacksonville.com/article/2012-nov-downtown-revitalization-tulsa)
Title: Re: Metro Jacksonville's review of Tulsa
Post by: carltonplace on June 24, 2013, 07:53:23 AM
Thanks for posting this. I find it interesting that we have common "walkability" scores, and the same problem with surface parking.
Title: Re: Metro Jacksonville's review of Tulsa
Post by: heironymouspasparagus on June 24, 2013, 07:39:45 PM



On the other hand, it carries the dubious distinction of being one of the largest American cities not providing public transit seven days a week.



Title: Re: Metro Jacksonville's review of Tulsa
Post by: TheArtist on June 25, 2013, 07:49:24 AM
Quote from: heironymouspasparagus on June 24, 2013, 07:39:45 PM


On the other hand, it carries the dubious distinction of being one of the largest American cities not providing public transit seven days a week.





I was actually struck by how much better their walk scores were.  There is quite a difference between a 74 and an 88.   
Title: Re: Metro Jacksonville's review of Tulsa
Post by: Red Arrow on June 25, 2013, 09:45:45 AM
Quote from: TheArtist on June 25, 2013, 07:49:24 AM
I was actually struck by how much better their walk scores were.  There is quite a difference between a 74 and an 88.   

Where did the 74 come from?
http://www.walkscore.com/OK

A while ago I was able to put in an address and get a walkscore.  This must be the wrong place as it only lists some cities.
Title: Re: Metro Jacksonville's review of Tulsa
Post by: TheArtist on June 25, 2013, 10:04:27 AM
Quote from: Red Arrow on June 25, 2013, 09:45:45 AM
Where did the 74 come from?
http://www.walkscore.com/OK

A while ago I was able to put in an address and get a walkscore.  This must be the wrong place as it only lists some cities.

The 74 is for the entire downtown as a whole.  Type in "downtown Tulsa".  Btw, the corner of 6th and Boston where my shop is gets an 89, not bad. 
Title: Re: Metro Jacksonville's review of Tulsa
Post by: Red Arrow on June 25, 2013, 10:27:34 AM
Quote from: TheArtist on June 25, 2013, 10:04:27 AM
The 74 is for the entire downtown as a whole.  Type in "downtown Tulsa".  Btw, the corner of 6th and Boston where my shop is gets an 89, not bad. 

Thanks.  We occasionally have internet "issues" here.  When I tried earlier, it wouldn't accept a typed-in address or neighborhood.
Title: Re: Metro Jacksonville's review of Tulsa
Post by: sauerkraut on July 05, 2013, 02:29:20 PM
Jacksonville & OKC have one big thing in common, they are both the largest cities area wise. I believe Jacksonville is #1 in land area and OKC is #2. I forgot how many square miles each one is with out looking it up.
Title: Re: Metro Jacksonville's review of Tulsa
Post by: Townsend on July 05, 2013, 03:10:23 PM
Quote from: sauerkraut on July 05, 2013, 02:29:20 PM
I forgot how many square miles each one is with out looking it up.

Go ahead, we'll wait.
Title: Re: Re: Metro Jacksonville's review of Tulsa
Post by: LeGenDz on July 05, 2013, 04:42:39 PM
I thought Houston was up there with OKC?

Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk 2
Title: Re: Metro Jacksonville's review of Tulsa
Post by: LeGenDz on July 05, 2013, 04:48:43 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_cities_by_area