Drudge is all over this, as most probably know.
(http://i154.photobucket.com/albums/s259/libertyman62/142329.jpg)
What's going on?
Is there something bigger than the mayoral race coming up?
Guido and Cubs came out from under their hoods at the same time to start posting again.
I googled "oympic fail". Turns out China has their own Paul Tay
(http://www.failfunnies.com/25/images/olympic-attention-whore-fail.jpg)
Yet another howler:
I removed off-topic personal banter. Please PM each other if you feel the need to blather back and forth.
- Moderator
Quote from: guido911 on October 02, 2009, 11:59:06 AM
Drudge is all over this, as most probably know.
(http://i154.photobucket.com/albums/s259/libertyman62/142329.jpg)
You're happy Chicago lost, then?
Yep, and he'd love to advance the story that it's all Obama's fault.
I'm sure he's not being a hypocrite...... I'm sure he blamed Bush when NYC's olympic bid fell short. ::)
Quote from: guido911 on October 02, 2009, 12:45:48 PM
CNN in shock:
This is what happens when "assuming the facts" prevails over "finding the facts." The very clear statement is made that goes against his assumptions, and he turns into babbling moron.
Quote from: we vs us on October 02, 2009, 01:15:16 PM
You're happy Chicago lost, then?
Chicago is arguably the most corrupt and violent city in this country, and I honestly believe that had the Olympics went there politicians and union bosses would have benefited the most. So, in that regard, I am happy. Sucks for the country as a whole though.
Incidentally,
Chicagoans were evenly split on whether they wanted the games there.
I think we have, to borrow a phrase from Obama, a "teachable moment", that being hubris and celebrity is not a good thing.
(http://soonerpsycho.com/spfarksandpics/thatsracistchicago.gif)
Quote from: guido911 on October 02, 2009, 04:22:23 PM
Chicago is arguably the most corrupt and violent city in this country, and I honestly believe that had the Olympics went there politicians and union bosses would have benefited the most. So, in that regard, I am happy. Sucks for the country as a whole though.
Incidentally, Chicagoans were evenly split on whether they wanted the games there.
I think we have, to borrow a phrase from Obama, a "teachable moment", that being hubris and celebrity is not a good thing.
So Chicago is the most crime ridden city in the USA. This is what the State Department says about Rio
QuoteCRIME: Crime throughout Brazil has reached very high levels. The Brazilian police and the Brazilian press report that the rate of crime continues to rise, especially in the major urban centers – though it is also spreading in rural areas. Brazil's murder rate is more than four times higher than that of the U.S. Rates for other crimes are similarly high. The majority of crimes are not solved. There were rapes reported by American citizens in 2008.
Street crime remains a problem for visitors and local residents alike, especially in the evenings and late at night. Foreign tourists are often targets of crime and Americans are not exempt. This targeting occurs in all tourist areas but is especially problematic in Sao Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Salvador and Recife.
Caution is advised with regard to nighttime travel through more rural areas and satellite cities due to reported incidents of roadside robberies that randomly target passing vehicles. Robbery and "quicknapping" outside of banks and ATM machines are common. In a "quicknapping," criminals abduct victims for a short time in order to receive a quick payoff from the family, business or the victim's ATM card. Some victims have been beaten and/or raped.
The incidence of crime against tourists is greater in areas surrounding beaches, hotels, discotheques, bars, nightclubs, and other similar establishments that cater to visitors. This type of crime is especially prevalent prior to and during Carnaval (Brazilian Mardi Gras), but takes place throughout the year. While the risk is greater at dusk and during the evening hours, street crime can occur both day and night, and even safer areas of cities are not immune. Incidents of theft on city buses are frequent. Several Brazilian cities have established specialized tourist police units to patrol areas frequented by tourists. In Rio de Janeiro, crime continues to plague the major tourist areas (see separate section on Rio de Janeiro).
At airports, hotel lobbies, bus stations and other public places, incidents of pick pocketing, theft of hand carried luggage, and laptop computers are common. Travelers should "dress down" when outside and avoid carrying valuables or wearing jewelry or expensive watches. "Good Samaritan" scams are common. If a tourist looks lost or seems to be having trouble communicating, a seemingly innocent bystander offering help may victimize them. Care should be taken at and around banks and internationally connected automatic teller machines that take U.S. credit or debit cards. Very poor neighborhoods known as "favelas" are found throughout Brazil. These areas are sites of uncontrolled criminal activity and are often not patrolled by police. U.S. citizens are advised to avoid these unsafe areas. Carjacking is on the increase in Sao Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Recife and other cities.
Travelers using personal ATMs or credit cards sometimes receive billing statements with non-authorized charges after returning from a visit to Brazil. The Embassy and Consulates have received numerous reports from both official Americans and tourists who have had their cards cloned or duplicated without their knowledge. Those using such payment methods should carefully monitor their banking online for the duration of their visit.
While the ability of Brazilian police to help recover stolen property is limited, it is nevertheless strongly advised to obtain a "boletim de ocorrencia" (police report) at a "delegacia" (police station) whenever any possessions are lost or stolen. This will facilitate the traveler's exit from Brazil and insurance claims.
Do you really really want to send our athletes over there? Or did you think this far?
Quick question, according to Forbes,
QuoteIn Depth: America's Most Dangerous Cities
Detroit was followed closely on the list by the greater Memphis, Tenn., and Miami, Fla., metropolitan areas. Those three were the only large cities in America with more than 950 violent crimes committed per 100,000 people.
This was taken from this list of 2009 http://www.forbes.com/2009/04/23/most-dangerous-cities-lifestyle-real-estate-dangerous-american-cities.html (http://www.forbes.com/2009/04/23/most-dangerous-cities-lifestyle-real-estate-dangerous-american-cities.html)
Funny, I don't see Chicago listed. Did they forget to look there or something?
My regret is the locals who think Tulsa has a snowball's chance in hell of getting the 2020 Olympics are now energized by Chicago's loss and will try to con the city council out of money. This will be fun to watch but not as fun as the Simpsons.
MONORAIL!
It's no wonder Chicago lost if anyone went over there with the attitude like ABC News.
In their reporting yesterday, they said the Olympic Committee is an "old white mans club who thinks they're royalty." If the US goes into these types of things with this type of attitude, they should finish last.
Rio only had to show a world map of where the Olympics have been held ever since they started... with none ever being held in South America. Slam dunk!
Quote from: HazMatCFO on October 03, 2009, 04:59:27 AM
My regret is the locals who think Tulsa has a snowball's chance in hell of getting the 2020 Olympics are now energized by Chicago's loss and will try to con the city council out of money. This will be fun to watch but not as fun as the Simpsons.
MONORAIL!
That was a classic episode.
Here's another clip of the shock and awe of news folks after hearing about the Olympic fail:
http://www.breitbart.tv/pandemonium-in-the-broadcast-center-chicago-loses-olympics-bid/
Did Michelle tell the IOC that she was still sitting on her daddy's lap at 20 years of age?
http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/02/quote-of-the-day-the-first-ladys-tall-olympic-tale/
Guido, we really missed you missing the facts....and We should realize that the United States represents less than 5% of the world. It will have to learn to play better with others.
Bush Administration's Tourist Visa Policy May Have Cost America The 2016 Olympics
http://thinkprogress.org/2009/10/02/chicago-olympics-bush/
" In spite of President Obama's lobbying efforts, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) may have chosen to reject hosting the 2016 summer olympic games in Chicago due to the post-9/11 visa tourist policies established by his predecessor, George W. Bush."
Rio made an excellent case the Summer Olympics should be in South America as its never been on their continent yet. Yet the Summer Olympics have been in North America held four times since 1968. Mexico City - 1968 / Montreal - 1976 / Los Angeles - 1984 / Atlanta - 1996. How many times in Europe in the same period? Three and then the 2012 games in London.
Looks as though the decision was based upon diversity of venue and it was a good argument for Rio to make. A major city in Africa is likely to make a similar plea in the future and have a strong chance io win if the rest of their bid is good.
Back away from the knee jerk Bush blame. Visa policies viewed as too restrictive for citizens of other nations to travel to the USA could have been relaxed by the current Administration if it was that important to win the 2016 Olympics for Chicago in exchange for weakening security for the nation.
I read that the real reason the U.S. lost its edge in the Olympic bid was because of money. Apparently the U.S. networks ticked off the IOCC over previous Olympics about the share of television money.
And, hey, Rio's argument that Brazil needs to host the Games because the Olympics has never been hosted in the Southern Hemisphere is pretty compelling.
I find it strange that so many right-wingers, who are usually so "USA! USA! USA!" and rah-rah about patriotism, were celebrating the U.S. Olympic bid's failure. Do wingers hate America? ???
Quote from: rwarn17588 on October 04, 2009, 10:58:45 AM
And, hey, Rio's argument that Brazil needs to host the Games because the Olympics has never been hosted in the Southern Hemisphere is pretty compelling.
Really? Where were the 2000 games held?
Quote from: rwarn17588 on October 04, 2009, 10:58:45 AM
I find it strange that so many right-wingers, who are usually so "USA! USA! USA!" and rah-rah about patriotism, were celebrating the U.S. Olympic bid's failure. Do wingers hate America? ???
For the umteenth time, the answer is "YES". All wingers hate America. Jeez. Will you ever get it? That's the only possible reason people are gloating about the arrogant one's failure (I mean, other than racism obviously).
Speaking of gloating (only because aox linked to thinkprogress in a feeble attempt at blaming Bush for his audacity in trying to keep this country safe from terrorists):
Quote from: rwarn17588 on October 04, 2009, 10:58:45 AM
And, hey, Rio's argument that Brazil needs to host the Games because the Olympics has never been hosted in the Southern Hemisphere is pretty compelling.
Melbourne, Australia, 1956 (http://"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1956_Summer_Olympics"). Interestingly, Buenos Aires was runner up for the '56 games, and Chicago, Minneapolis, San Francisco, and Philadelphia were all eliminated in the first round.
Still, it is compelling that the games have never been held in South America, although they were held in Latin America -- Mexico City in 1968. Even so, 1956 and 1968 were a long time ago.
Quote from: MichaelBates on October 04, 2009, 03:12:41 PM
Melbourne, Australia, 1956 (http://"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1956_Summer_Olympics"). Interestingly, Buenos Aires was runner up for the '56 games, and Chicago, Minneapolis, San Francisco, and Philadelphia were all eliminated in the first round.
Still, it is compelling that the games have never been held in South America, although they were held in Latin America -- Mexico City in 1968. Even so, 1956 and 1968 were a long time ago.
Um, Sydney Australia in 2000?
Quote from: guido911 on October 04, 2009, 03:28:20 PM
Um, Sydney Australia in 2000?
wow, thought you were educated.
MB said SOUTH AMERICA not the southern hemisphere, although someone else did. But you quoted MB.
In your blind hatred of everything that has to do with our current president, you missed that little tidbit.
OK, you can return to Freeping now....
SNL's take:
http://www.hulu.com/watch/99945/saturday-night-live-obama-address
Quote from: MichaelBates on October 04, 2009, 03:12:41 PM
Still, it is compelling that the games have never been held in South America, although they were held in Latin America -- Mexico City in 1968. Even so, 1956 and 1968 were a long time ago.
Time sure flies.
Quote from: guido911 on October 04, 2009, 03:28:20 PM
Um, Sydney Australia in 2000?
Yep. Completely forgot about that one. So, not that long ago for the Southern Hemisphere, but still never for South America.
Aw, Drat. I meant to write South America, but had a brain f*rt and wrote Southern Hemisphere instead. Sheesh. More caffeine, please.
As for guido ...
Quote from: guido911 on October 04, 2009, 01:21:36 PM
For the umteenth time, the answer is "YES". All wingers hate America. Jeez. Will you ever get it? That's the only possible reason people are gloating about the arrogant one's failure (I mean, other than racism obviously).
Give 'im enough rope ...
Quote from: MichaelBates on October 04, 2009, 07:37:20 PM
Yep. Completely forgot about that one. So, not that long ago for the Southern Hemisphere, but still never for South America.
Hope you did think I was slapping you. It was just that Sydney was so freakin recent.
Quote from: rwarn17588 on October 04, 2009, 07:43:01 PM
Aw, Drat. I meant to write South America, but had a brain f*rt and wrote Southern Hemisphere instead. Sheesh. More caffeine, please.
As for guido ...
Give 'im enough rope ...
Rope for what? You didn't get the sarcasm?
Quote from: guido911 on October 04, 2009, 04:17:15 PM
SNL's take:
http://www.hulu.com/watch/99945/saturday-night-live-obama-address
That was awesome.
It was weak...real weak....it was lame...not funny....bad acting....poor writing. Typical SNL.
FWIW, the people who follow the Olympics have said it was meant as a slap to the US Olympic committee over revenue sharing (we make the revenue and don't share enough of it). It wasn't about Chicago at all. But they really didn't think the "slap" would knock them out the first round (hence the surprise in the room). After Chicago was out Rio was the obvious choice (Rio may have won anyway of course)
When the Chicago Bears lost to the Green Bay Packers on opening day, I blamed Obama.
Funny how Guido revels over Chicago and Obama's "failure," yet doesn't make a peep about Rio, ruled by this lefty guy....
(http://img.timeinc.net/time/europe/magazine/2009/0316/brazil_0316.jpg)
The One Country That Might Avoid Recession Is...
By Tim Padgett and Andrew Downie / Sao Paulo Thursday, Mar. 05, 2009
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1883301,00.html
'White, blue-eyed bankers have brought world economy to its knees': What the Brazilian President told Gordon Brown
By James Chapman
Last updated at 9:41 AM on 27th March 2009
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1165089/White-blue-eyed-bankers-brought-world-economy-knees-What-Brazilian-President-told-Gordon-Brown.html#ixzz0TN5keXCy
'This was a crisis that was fostered and boosted by irrational behaviour of people that are white, blue-eyed, that before the crisis looked like they knew everything about economics,' he declared.
'Now they have demonstrated that they don't know anything about economics.'
President Lula, head of Brazil's main left-wing party, said that 'no black man or woman, no indigenous person, no poor person' had been in any way culpable for the global banking crisis.
'I'm not acquainted with any black banker,' he said. 'The part of humanity that's responsible should pay for the crisis.'
Quote from: USRufnex on October 08, 2009, 01:55:38 PM
Funny how Guido revels over Chicago and Obama's "failure," yet doesn't make a peep about Rio, ruled by this lefty guy....
Peep.
Obama's reported response at losing the Olympics:
No, Gweed.
That's not Barack Obama.
That's gonna be you later on this morning when you find out he just won the Nobel Peace Prize.
Have a nice day! ;D
Quote from: USRufnex on October 09, 2009, 07:59:00 AM
No, Gweed.
That's not Barack Obama.
That's gonna be you later on this morning when you find out he just won the Nobel Peace Prize.
Have a nice day! ;D
If I'd had coffee it'd be spat all over my monitor.
Thanks Ruf