The Tulsa Forum by TulsaNow

Talk About Tulsa => Other Tulsa Discussion => Topic started by: Wrinkle on August 20, 2008, 02:10:45 PM

Title: TMUA Closed-Door Meeting
Post by: Wrinkle on August 20, 2008, 02:10:45 PM
TMUA's meeting next week (//%22http://www.cityoftulsa.org/agendas/agendax.asp?FN=0009E8E8&num=1%22) amounts to a closed-door event with discussions of their EPA & DEQ Violation Notices, ostensibly with their attorneys.

While some of that may seem necessary (if one takes the posture that a legal defense is the last resort), the events surrounding this notification of violations and what they intend to do to rectify the situation to EPA/DEQ's satisfaction SHOULD be a matter of PUBLIC discussion.

Why isn't it?

They havent indicated a regular meeting following the closed-door session with a public part to announce any conclusions/recommendations, etc.

What are these guys hiding?

[EDITED TO A FUTURE TENSE BY WRINKLE]
Title: TMUA Closed-Door Meeting
Post by: Double A on August 20, 2008, 02:16:13 PM
CYA spin session.
Title: TMUA Closed-Door Meeting
Post by: Conan71 on August 20, 2008, 02:34:52 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Wrinkle

TMUA's meeting this morning (//%22http://www.cityoftulsa.org/agendas/agendax.asp?FN=0009E8E8&num=1%22) amounted to a closed-door event with discussions of their EPA & DEQ Violation Notices, ostensibly with their attorneys.

While some of that may seem necessary (if one takes the posture that a legal defense is the last resort), the events surrounding this notification of violations and what they intend to do to rectify the situation to EPA/DEQ's satisfaction SHOULD be a matter of PUBLIC discussion.

Why wasn't it?

They didn't even follow the closed-door session with a public part to announce any conclusions/recommendations, etc.

What are these guys hiding?





The link you posted is for a meeting next Weds. morning, unless I've been asleep for a week and today is the 27th.

Title: TMUA Closed-Door Meeting
Post by: RecycleMichael on August 20, 2008, 02:54:14 PM
There is legal discussions surrounding sewer regulations. Any time there are discussions involving legal issues, it is smart to do it in executive session. Any action will have to take place in a public meeting, but discussions can be done in executive session.
Title: TMUA Closed-Door Meeting
Post by: Wrinkle on August 20, 2008, 03:22:55 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Conan71

quote:
Originally posted by Wrinkle

TMUA's meeting this morning (//%22http://www.cityoftulsa.org/agendas/agendax.asp?FN=0009E8E8&num=1%22) amounted to a closed-door event with discussions of their EPA & DEQ Violation Notices, ostensibly with their attorneys.

While some of that may seem necessary (if one takes the posture that a legal defense is the last resort), the events surrounding this notification of violations and what they intend to do to rectify the situation to EPA/DEQ's satisfaction SHOULD be a matter of PUBLIC discussion.

Why wasn't it?

They didn't even follow the closed-door session with a public part to announce any conclusions/recommendations, etc.

What are these guys hiding?





The link you posted is for a meeting next Weds. morning, unless I've been asleep for a week and today is the 27th.






You're correct. Hasn't happened yet. But, will.
Hold my posting until next Wednesday afternoon, please.

Actually, I was looking at several agendas at the time and apparently confused dates.

Title: TMUA Closed-Door Meeting
Post by: rwarn17588 on August 20, 2008, 03:25:05 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Wrinkle

quote:
Originally posted by Conan71

quote:
Originally posted by Wrinkle

TMUA's meeting this morning (//%22http://www.cityoftulsa.org/agendas/agendax.asp?FN=0009E8E8&num=1%22) amounted to a closed-door event with discussions of their EPA & DEQ Violation Notices, ostensibly with their attorneys.

While some of that may seem necessary (if one takes the posture that a legal defense is the last resort), the events surrounding this notification of violations and what they intend to do to rectify the situation to EPA/DEQ's satisfaction SHOULD be a matter of PUBLIC discussion.

Why wasn't it?

They didn't even follow the closed-door session with a public part to announce any conclusions/recommendations, etc.

What are these guys hiding?





The link you posted is for a meeting next Weds. morning, unless I've been asleep for a week and today is the 27th.






You're correct. Hasn't happened yet. But, will.
Hold my posting until next Wednesday afternoon, please.




And so Wrinkle hits the "Pause" button on his Outage-O-Meter.

[}:)]
Title: TMUA Closed-Door Meeting
Post by: Wrinkle on August 20, 2008, 03:30:28 PM
quote:
Originally posted by rwarn17588

quote:
Originally posted by Wrinkle

quote:
Originally posted by Conan71

quote:
Originally posted by Wrinkle

TMUA's meeting this morning (//%22http://www.cityoftulsa.org/agendas/agendax.asp?FN=0009E8E8&num=1%22) amounted to a closed-door event with discussions of their EPA & DEQ Violation Notices, ostensibly with their attorneys.

While some of that may seem necessary (if one takes the posture that a legal defense is the last resort), the events surrounding this notification of violations and what they intend to do to rectify the situation to EPA/DEQ's satisfaction SHOULD be a matter of PUBLIC discussion.

Why wasn't it?

They didn't even follow the closed-door session with a public part to announce any conclusions/recommendations, etc.

What are these guys hiding?





The link you posted is for a meeting next Weds. morning, unless I've been asleep for a week and today is the 27th.






You're correct. Hasn't happened yet. But, will.
Hold my posting until next Wednesday afternoon, please.




And so Wrinkle hits the "Pause" button on his Outage-O-Meter.

[}:)]



I'm actually only slightly less outaged that it's still going to happen than if it already had.