|
|
|
cannon_fodder
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: June 13, 2007, 09:05:27 am » |
|
That sounds a lot like science and fact - they aren't interested.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
- - - - - - - - -
I crush grooves.
|
|
|
|
sgrizzle
|
|
« Reply #2 on: June 13, 2007, 09:56:11 am » |
|
But, but, but what about that one hotel in spain that one time?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
altruismsuffers
|
|
« Reply #3 on: June 13, 2007, 09:36:48 pm » |
|
ok this video is great, it raises interesting questions....but why does the 9/11 commission totally dismiss the CORE COLUMNS as if they didn't exist? They refered to them as a "Hollow Center Shaft".... plus this is a great replica of the IMPACT..but NOT what happened afterwards...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
cannon_fodder
|
|
« Reply #4 on: June 14, 2007, 08:29:32 am » |
|
the University website stated that it took some 9 months to construct and test this model and they were working on the next phase - collapse. It requires programming the physics of fire on steel - extensive work with their metallurgy school etc.
It will be interesting to see what they find out.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
- - - - - - - - -
I crush grooves.
|
|
|
|
iplaw
Guest
|
|
« Reply #5 on: June 14, 2007, 08:36:26 am » |
|
quote:
Originally posted by altruismsuffers
ok this video is great, it raises interesting questions....but why does the 9/11 commission totally dismiss the CORE COLUMNS as if they didn't exist? They refered to them as a "Hollow Center Shaft".... plus this is a great replica of the IMPACT..but NOT what happened afterwards...
Because the 9/11 commission deferred to the engineering reports instead of reguritating them, but we've been over this before. The 9/11 commission also didn't bother the report the direction from whence the sun came up every day either...does that suffice as a conspiracy? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
swake
|
|
« Reply #6 on: June 14, 2007, 10:37:31 am » |
|
quote:
Originally posted by altruismsuffers
ok this video is great....plus this is a great replica of the IMPACT..
So you agree that planes hit the buildings! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
MichaelC
Guest
|
|
« Reply #7 on: June 14, 2007, 10:51:55 am » |
|
quote:
Originally posted by swake
quote:
Originally posted by altruismsuffers
ok this video is great....plus this is a great replica of the IMPACT..
So you agree that planes hit the buildings!
lol |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
altruismsuffers
|
|
« Reply #8 on: June 14, 2007, 11:27:58 am » |
|
quote:
Originally posted by cannon_fodder
the University website stated that it took some 9 months to construct and test this model and they were working on the next phase - collapse. It requires programming the physics of fire on steel - extensive work with their metallurgy school etc.
It will be interesting to see what they find out.
Yes it will be interesting because of all the tests NIST did they could barely get the model to fail and even then it was still a highly unprobable collapse. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Breadburner
|
|
« Reply #9 on: June 14, 2007, 12:14:54 pm » |
|
quote:
Originally posted by altruismsuffers
quote:
Originally posted by cannon_fodder
the University website stated that it took some 9 months to construct and test this model and they were working on the next phase - collapse. It requires programming the physics of fire on steel - extensive work with their metallurgy school etc.
It will be interesting to see what they find out.
Yes it will be interesting because of all the tests NIST did they could barely get the model to fail and even then it was still a highly unprobable collapse.
 "Is that hair gel" |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
guido911
|
|
« Reply #10 on: June 14, 2007, 01:04:19 pm » |
|
quote:
Originally posted by MichaelC
quote:
Originally posted by swake
quote:
Originally posted by altruismsuffers
ok this video is great....plus this is a great replica of the IMPACT..
So you agree that planes hit the buildings!
lol
Ditto the lol. At least it's a start |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Someone get Hoss a pacifier.
|
|
|
|
iplaw
Guest
|
|
« Reply #11 on: June 14, 2007, 02:08:43 pm » |
|
quote:
Yes it will be interesting because of all the tests NIST did they could barely get the model to fail and even then it was still a highly unprobable collapse.
Evidence please. Pick a thread already. How about this one?http://www.tulsanow.org/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=6826 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
