A grassroots organization focused on the intelligent and sustainable development, preservation and revitalization of Tulsa.
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 18, 2017, 08:11:54 am
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: $60M in V2025 Surplus?  (Read 2248 times)
JCnOwasso
Civic Leader
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 372


WWW
« Reply #15 on: August 28, 2013, 12:04:54 pm »

It could also be argued that spending 60M on early education programs and after school activities would be a little more successful in making these kids a better citizen.  Why try to fix it after it is broken when you can form it from the start.
Logged

 
carltonplace
Historic Artifact
City Father
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4565



WWW
« Reply #16 on: August 28, 2013, 02:38:19 pm »

I thought Tulsa forfeited its claim on any Surplus funds in order to cover the cost overruns on the BOK center?

Personally I don't want the county to put the JJC in our downtown.
Logged
swake
T-Town Elder
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 7284



« Reply #17 on: August 28, 2013, 02:39:53 pm »

I thought Tulsa forfeited its claim on any Surplus funds in order to cover the cost overruns on the BOK center?

Personally I don't want the county to put the JJC in our downtown.

It will replace Storey Wrecker. If that's not a good thing, I don't know what is.
Logged
Vision 2025
Philanthropist
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 767


WWW
« Reply #18 on: August 28, 2013, 02:48:14 pm »

I thought Tulsa forfeited its claim on any Surplus funds in order to cover the cost overruns on the BOK center?
Only for the first $45.5 million...
Logged

Vision 2025 Program Director - know the facts, www.Vision2025.info
Vision 2025
Philanthropist
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 767


WWW
« Reply #19 on: August 28, 2013, 02:55:17 pm »



Personally I don't want the county to put the JJC in our downtown.
OK then, where would your preferred central site location be that easily works with, law enforcement, public transportation, legal profession(s), worker infrastructure (eateries, etc.) has appropriate utility and roadway infrastructure would be located?
Logged

Vision 2025 Program Director - know the facts, www.Vision2025.info
DTowner
City Father
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1252


« Reply #20 on: August 28, 2013, 03:20:39 pm »

OK then, where would your preferred central site location be that easily works with, law enforcement, public transportation, legal profession(s), worker infrastructure (eateries, etc.) has appropriate utility and roadway infrastructure would be located?

Enough already with the logic and sensible questions.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

 
  Hosted by TulsaConnect and Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
 

Mission

 

"TulsaNow's Mission is to help Tulsa become the most vibrant, diverse, sustainable and prosperous city of our size. We achieve this by focusing on the development of Tulsa's distinctive identity and economic growth around a dynamic, urban core, complemented by a constellation of livable, thriving communities."
more...

 

Contact

 

2210 S Main St.
Tulsa, OK 74114
(918) 409-2669
info@tulsanow.org