|
TheTed
|
 |
« Reply #150 on: February 12, 2013, 12:36:45 pm » |
|
They had both outside lanes closed off and the western sidewalk just now. Is there some reason this couldn't have been done during the several months the bridge was done and the only major work being done was on the approaches?
If it had been finished in a timely manner, without delays getting started, and multiple opening dates that never happened, it'd be forgivable.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
carltonplace
|
|
« Reply #151 on: February 12, 2013, 03:52:51 pm » |
|
And the decorative colored lights were not working on last Saturday...well some were and most weren't.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Conan71
|
|
« Reply #152 on: February 12, 2013, 04:17:28 pm » |
|
And the decorative colored lights were not working on last Saturday...well some were and most weren't.
I hope they didn't use the same contractor they used to light the QT Center. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first” -Ronald Reagan
|
|
|
|
Townsend
|
|
« Reply #153 on: February 12, 2013, 04:20:18 pm » |
|
I hope they didn't use the same contractor they used to light the QT Center.
Out of business soon after they installed the lights on the QT center. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Markk
|
|
« Reply #154 on: February 12, 2013, 05:01:30 pm » |
|
Breaking news: They started to install artwork along the west side this morning (without taking it from the east side), then took everything down from the west side and left. This is really exciting to watch.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
BKDotCom
|
|
« Reply #155 on: February 12, 2013, 06:34:56 pm » |
|
Breaking news: They started to install artwork along the west side this morning (without taking it from the east side), then took everything down from the west side and left. This is really exciting to watch.
They're really performing some soft of conceptual art thing Watch the time-lapse. The animation is amazing. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
carltonplace
|
|
« Reply #156 on: February 25, 2013, 09:49:32 am » |
|
I like the effect that the artwork has on the bridge now that it is finally installed.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
TheTed
|
|
« Reply #157 on: February 25, 2013, 11:46:04 am » |
|
So are they really done now? As in all cones, trucks and other barriers moved from all sidewalks and road surfaces on the bridge?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
carltonplace
|
|
« Reply #158 on: February 25, 2013, 12:14:03 pm » |
|
Well there are still some 2X4s laying around but other than that I can't see anything else that needs to be done. Now let's two-way Boulder Ave
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TheTed
|
|
« Reply #160 on: April 12, 2013, 01:25:49 pm » |
|
The lighting is not extremely bright. It's a good level of brightness. Between that and/or the views, people must really like it.
Nearly every time I walk across it at night, a car either stops at the top for several minutes or drives extremely slowly (or they're just part of the 75% of downtown nighttime drivers who have no idea where they're going or how to get there).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
BKDotCom
|
|
« Reply #161 on: April 12, 2013, 01:32:42 pm » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
hello
|
|
« Reply #162 on: April 12, 2013, 03:19:00 pm » |
|
No, it looks really nice at night. I was driving down Cheyenne the other night and did a double take. Very nice addition to Downtown.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Weatherdemon
|
|
« Reply #163 on: April 13, 2013, 01:13:48 pm » |
|
No, it looks really nice at night. I was driving down Cheyenne the other night and did a double take. Very nice addition to Downtown.
It is quite nice. Just out of the way unless you're coming from the BOk Center. Does it get much use by pedestrians? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Townsend
|
|
« Reply #164 on: January 30, 2014, 02:22:30 pm » |
|
City of Tulsa's decision not to buy bridge surge protector may have cost taxpayers thousandshttp://www.kjrh.com/news/local-news/investigations/city-spends-462000-on-bridge-lights-months-later-half-stop-workingThe opening of the Boulder Bridge in downtown Tulsa was a big day for the city.
It was a sunny day in February of 2013. It featured a ribbon-cutting and marching band.
"Simply having this bridge going over the railroad tracks from one terrific side to the other," Mayor Dewey Bartlett said at the unveiling.
It features unique metal artwork with rows of LED light strips underneath to illuminate it at night, but just eight months after the opening, the rows of LED lights stopped working on the bridge's west side.
The lights were part of a grand plan to make the bridge an artistic landmark in Tulsa. It's a bridge with a lot of history.
The Boulder Bridge was built in 1929, was closed for a decade for safety reasons and was torn down in 2009. A rebuilding project launched soon after, and four years and $8 million later, the Boulder Bridge was open once again.
City of Tulsa Field Engineer Manager Terry Ball says the city hired a contractor to put in the lights, which cost $462,000 -- paid for through a sales tax and bond money.
When the lights on the west side stopped working, Ball says the contractor checked it out.
"There was device that was burnt up and he sent it back to the factory to have it looked at, and they put a new one in, but the factory said they'd either seen a lightning strike they think or a surge," Ball said.
The 2NEWS Investigators obtained emails and letters to the city from the light project contractor, subcontractor and an engineering firm. All three cite lightning as a possible or likely reason for the destroyed LED light strips.
But the 2NEWS Investigators found the city didn't have one key component that could've prevented the damage caused by the lightning strike -- something many of us use everyday: a surge protector.
Taxpayers we talked to were surprised.
"There's weather and so that needs to be taken into consideration anytime that you're building anything that may be affected by weather," said Tulsa taxpayer Georgi Magrady.
"They should've paid the extra for the surge protector," said Bob Magrady.
"That would've been the smart thing to do," said Joel Dollar.
"The question is: What do they do now? How do they fix the situation without taking more money out of our pockets?" Magrady said.
We asked the city that same question too. The subcontractor that installed the lights calls the incident an "act of God" and that isn't covered under warranty. So that means you, the taxpayer, will have to pay for the fix.
A surge protector could have prevented the suspected lightning damage and saved the city the cost to fix it too.
Ball realizes not getting the protector may have been a costly mistake.
In fact, after our interview, Ball said the city turned off the east side lights as well until a surge protector is installed saying in an email they "don't want to risk any additional damage."
A city spokesperson says they don't know right now how much it will cost to fix the LED lights.
They are also looking at the price of surge protectors. We did too. We talked to professionals in industrial surge protection, and they told us that to protect the nearly $500,000 worth of LED lights on the bridge, it would have cost the city between $1,000 to $2,000.
Ball says the lessons learned this time around will be used in the future. He says now they will look at getting surge protectors.
"That would be one thing we'd talk about with design and see if on future ones make sure that we do have that, cause when you do have elevated surfaces like a bridge it may be prone more to the lightning," said Ball.
A dark spot in a project that was years in the making.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
