Can you elaborate please?
Poorly designed sidewalks, curb ramps, and crosswalks, such as those
here at 41st StreetHow is a blind pedestrian supposed to know where the crosswalks are?
Why is the street drainage designed so water collects at the crosswalks?
Why is there a pole in the middle of a curb ramp?
Why are there push buttons for pedestrians mounted above the curb ramp instead of a more level surface?
Why are there push buttons for pedestrians at all? (Why should pedestrians be required to request to cross a street?)
Why are rough pavers used on both the curb ramps and in the crosswalks? (How do rough walking surfaces facilitate the safe passage of pedestrians? Wheelchairs? People using canes or walkers or pushing strollers? Blind or visually impaired pedestrians? Motor vehicles?)
----
Poorly designed sidewalks, curb ramps, crosswalks, curbs, planting areas, and plantings such as those
at 33rd Place.
Why are small broadleaf evergreens planted instead of deciduous shade trees along the sidewalk?
What's the purpose of the center median?
What's the purpose of the poorly maintained planting area below the tree?
What's the purpose of the pavement marking paint on the curb ramps?
------------
M.B. Cherry Street has already gotten some "streetscaping" work, fairly recently. Here's an example at St. Louis Ave:
July 2011 viewNote how the curb ramps are paired, so someone who couldn't handle a curb would be able to directly cross either north-south or east-west. Note also how the curb ramp concrete at the corner appears newer than the sidewalk concrete. I imagine it is newer, probably because the curb ramps replaced sidewalks with full height curbs all around the street corners.
Note also that the paired curb ramps have hot pink marking paint on them, indicating that the existing curb ramps are to be replaced with new "Type A" ramps.
By
February 2014, the curb ramps shown in the July 2011 photo had been replaced.
The problem, as I see it, is that the new curb ramps are worse than what they replaced. A single curb ramp, pointed toward the middle of an intersection, is not very useful for a blind pedestrian or anyone confined to a wheelchair. The new curb ramps should have been paired as the old curb ramps were, directing pedestrian into a crosswalk, not into the middle of the intersection -- something like the City of Tulsa's own
Standard 790 for curb ramps.
Notice also that sometime between July 2011 and February 2014, a portion of the sidewalk along St. Louis had been removed and replaced with a strip of grass and some street trees. I don't have a problem with the trees, or with the tables and chairs on the sidewalk, either. But evidently,
someone with the City of Tulsa does have an issue with sidewalk cafés on public sidewalks.
Those curb ramps can't be more than 5 and a half years old. Do they need replacing already? If so, why were they installed at all? Some of the curb ramps in my neighborhood have been replaced several times in recent years, usually with designs which are inferior to what was replaced, and sometimes not compliant with the ADA. Why?
M.B. Cherry could be made more accessible to pedestrians with disabilities, but the City has actually made the situation worse in some instances. The best way to make 15th more pedestrian friendly is to slow the vehicular traffic down and to protect people on the sidewalks. The Downtown Coordinating Council has hired a walkability expert to study the downtown area, but the principles are the same on 15th, 11th, Peoria, etc.
- Keep traffic lanes narrow (10 feet)
- Allow on-street parking along the curbs
- Plant shade trees along the sidewalk, close to the curb lines
Many walkability improvements can be accomplished with paint, which is relatively inexpensive compared to moving curbs, relocating utilities, installing pavers, or changing grades/drainage structures.