The Tulsa Forum by TulsaNow

Talk About Tulsa => PlaniTulsa & Urban Planning => Topic started by: brettakins on September 05, 2016, 12:18:41 pm



Title: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: brettakins on September 05, 2016, 12:18:41 pm
http://www.tulsaworld.com/homepagelatest/toll-road-under-consideration-to-finish-tulsa-s-gilcrease-expressway/article_b16f0660-39e5-5810-8e7a-119ae362a1db.html (http://www.tulsaworld.com/homepagelatest/toll-road-under-consideration-to-finish-tulsa-s-gilcrease-expressway/article_b16f0660-39e5-5810-8e7a-119ae362a1db.html)
(http://)


I really hate idea of a toll but if that is the only way to get this completed in a timely manner then I'm all for it.


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: SXSW on September 05, 2016, 01:30:08 pm
This has been on the boards for so long I'll believe it when I see it.  NW Tulsa is one of the last undeveloped parts of the city.  I would like to see more thoughtful development there then what has been built in SW Tulsa, something like Bradburn Village in Broomfield, CO:
(http://www.terrain.org/unsprawl/22/images/bradburn_aerial.jpg)

The challenges in developing NW Tulsa are the existing low performing TPS schools, hilly terrain, and lack of any retail.  That is why you need a large master-planned housing development so you can create a small town center for essential retail (grocery, pharmacy, coffee shop, etc) and also build a new elementary school.  That is what they did with Bradburn Village. 



Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: AquaMan on September 05, 2016, 01:58:14 pm
I know that area very well. You're describing the symptons of NW Tulsa not the causes for its malaise. Its the lack of good manufacturing jobs they used to depend on, the high density of low quality homes, and the predominantly low income, low education families. Other than Gilgrease Hills and the original Tulsa, Crosbie, Owen Park areas there just isn't much in demographics over there to attract development. They deserve good shopping, good grocers and retail, but most investors see the area as suitable for rental property, industrial and not much else. Some of that is Osage county management, part of it is being ignored by COT and Tulsa County.

If you think its a case of "build it and they will come" including schools and an expressway, I'm afraid it isn't likely. They need good jobs.


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: SXSW on September 05, 2016, 03:29:17 pm
Well it is just a few miles outside downtown where the largest concentration of office jobs are in the city.  I would think NW Tulsa and a 5-10 minute commute would be attractive for people working downtown.  It's also close to the airport and aerospace industries.  What would you propose to bring in more jobs to this area?  I think if we keep building up downtown this will be a natural extension of that growth if it can overcome the challenges I mentioned above.  Just plopping down a suburban-style neighborhood by the Gilcrease Expressway won't cut it.

There are some hilly areas that have downright amazing views.  The areas along 53rd W Ave remind me of west Austin before it became overdeveloped or the hilly parts of south Tulsa.  If you haven't been to the botanical garden it is a gem that will only get better as the plants mature and they build more gardens and trails.  The Gilcrease extension will certainly improve access to that.


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: davideinstein on September 05, 2016, 05:47:05 pm
How many highways do we need?


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: Red Arrow on September 05, 2016, 08:56:02 pm
How many highways do we need?
7


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: heironymouspasparagus on September 06, 2016, 12:10:33 pm
How many highways do we need?


More....

Always more....


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: DowntownDan on September 08, 2016, 06:49:29 am
Fewer highways.  Less sprawl.  This is a continuation of the old way of thinking about cities. 


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: Conan71 on September 08, 2016, 07:19:51 am
Fewer highways.  Less sprawl.  This is a continuation of the old way of thinking about cities.  

Tulsa’s style of sprawl is also a failed economic model yet those in leadership keep ignoring the obvious.


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: cannon_fodder on September 08, 2016, 12:37:52 pm
Lets take the money we would spend on a highway and use it to encourage the desired economic development. Boulevards, beautification, tax breaks, good schools... lets see if that can't do it when a highway can't (see, .e.g., the Tisdale loop having tons of empty lots). I'm sure we can come up with a creative proposal that beats a highway.


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: DTowner on September 08, 2016, 01:21:34 pm
Lets take the money we would spend on a highway and use it to encourage the desired economic development. Boulevards, beautification, tax breaks, good schools... lets see if that can't do it when a highway can't (see, .e.g., the Tisdale loop having tons of empty lots). I'm sure we can come up with a creative proposal that beats a highway.

Wasn’t the Northwest Passage development announced in the late 1990s supposed to be just that sort of grand development that was going to spur growth in the entire area?  Seems that very little came of it.

The Gilcrease Expressway has been on the planning map for something like 50 years and at the current pace will not be completed for another 40 years.  By building it in such small segments, it is something of a highway from nowhere to nowhere.  While I doubt completing the Gilcrease will have anywhere near the developmental effect that the Creek Turnpike had, it’s hard to argue that without it nothing much has happened in the area or is likely to happen in the coming decades.

If Tulsa grows, it is going to keep pushing its boundaries outward.  It would be better to do that in all directions, instead of primarily to the south/southeast.


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: Conan71 on September 08, 2016, 01:47:53 pm
Wasn’t the Northwest Passage development announced in the late 1990s supposed to be just that sort of grand development that was going to spur growth in the entire area?  Seems that very little came of it.

The Gilcrease Expressway has been on the planning map for something like 50 years and at the current pace will not be completed for another 40 years.  By building it in such small segments, it is something of a highway from nowhere to nowhere.  While I doubt completing the Gilcrease will have anywhere near the developmental effect that the Creek Turnpike had, it’s hard to argue that without it nothing much has happened in the area or is likely to happen in the coming decades.

If Tulsa grows, it is going to keep pushing its boundaries outward.  It would be better to do that in all directions, instead of primarily to the south/southeast.


JMO, if road access is the only thing supposedly stifling growth in NW Tulsa, then the area would benefit just as well with Edison being four-laned to 65th W. Ave.  Apache has been improved in recent years as well as (I think) 36th St. North west out to 52nd West. Ave.  That puts highway access within a few miles or less from the south (I-244 with exits every mile or so) and the east (The LL Tis) to those areas.  FFS, you don’t have to bring a highway to the front door to make for better access.

Perhaps those living west of Central HS don’t care for dense neighborhoods and that’s why they moved out that way in the first place.

“It may be a road to nowhere and a complete boondoggle, but it’s been on the books for years, therefore let’s build it!"


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: heironymouspasparagus on September 08, 2016, 05:47:54 pm
Fewer highways.  Less sprawl.  This is a continuation of the old way of thinking about cities.  


Just in case you think I really meant 'more'.... No!  I agree with you.  That was as sarcastic as can be expressed without inflection and voice tones....






Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: AquaMan on September 08, 2016, 06:03:17 pm
JMO, if road access is the only thing supposedly stifling growth in NW Tulsa, then the area would benefit just as well with Edison being four-laned to 65th W. Ave.  Apache has been improved in recent years as well as (I think) 36th St. North west out to 52nd West. Ave.  That puts highway access within a few miles or less from the south (I-244 with exits every mile or so) and the east (The LL Tis) to those areas.  FFS, you don’t have to bring a highway to the front door to make for better access.

Perhaps those living west of Central HS don’t care for dense neighborhoods and that’s why they moved out that way in the first place.

“It may be a road to nowhere and a complete boondoggle, but it’s been on the books for years, therefore let’s build it!"

Getting around those areas is not difficult. People did move out there for the lack of density. A friend of mine used to tell me that people who moved to Black Dog couldn't get along with other people very well! The truth is that no one in Northwest Tulsa really wants to be connected to the people living in West Tulsa anymore than Westies  and Berryhill give a flip about the Sand Springs line and Osage. Its the people who don't live in those areas that seem to want the connection. I guess to have another way around the metro. Anyway, it hasn't been done because there is no real purpose for it other than vague promises of increased development. Oh, and Dewey owns land out that way.


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: dbacksfan 2.0 on September 08, 2016, 07:10:46 pm
I knew some people back in the 80's and the early 90's that lived in that area between Chandler Park/Berryhill and West 41st and I would tell them that I forgot about that area, and they would say "That's why we moved there." W 41st & Hwy 97 was where they shopped and I want to say back then it was a Safeway that became a Homeland store was where the went, and working downtown was a nice drive with way less traffic. It's what a 15 to 20 minute drive from that area into downtown?


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: Hoss on September 08, 2016, 08:34:54 pm
I knew some people back in the 80's and the early 90's that lived in that area between Chandler Park/Berryhill and West 41st and I would tell them that I forgot about that area, and they would say "That's why we moved there." W 41st & Hwy 97 was where they shopped and I want to say back then it was a Safeway that became a Homeland store was where the went, and working downtown was a nice drive with way less traffic. It's what a 15 to 20 minute drive from that area into downtown?

Not really...unless there is construction or a wreck...97 to downtown now is about 10 minutes.  However for me I get into downtown from that stretch by taking the Quanah exit.


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: Conan71 on September 08, 2016, 08:35:53 pm
It's what a 15 to 20 minute drive from that area into downtown?

If that.


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: dbacksfan 2.0 on September 08, 2016, 10:06:56 pm
Been a while, what can I say. Have to say I think it's stupid to cut through that area now. Maybe back in the 60's when it would have connected all of the manufacturing along Charles Page, west 21st and over to where Unit Rig and all the manufacturing that was/is in that area. But with the Red Fork 244/444 and highway 97 it just seems pointless, unlike the heads of many in charge at the state. (Bless their little hearts)


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: Conan71 on September 09, 2016, 09:29:27 am
Been a while, what can I say. Have to say I think it's stupid to cut through that area now. Maybe back in the 60's when it would have connected all of the manufacturing along Charles Page, west 21st and over to where Unit Rig and all the manufacturing that was/is in that area. But with the Red Fork 244/444 and highway 97 it just seems pointless, unlike the heads of many in charge at the state. (Bless their little hearts)

Agreed.  The Chas. Page industrial corridor has been dying a slow death for a few decades.  This is to stroke a few egos and as someone else suspects, people sitting on property in the area (who don’t live on it) probably think they can gain from a highway cross-cutting the land.

North Tulsans will be told this will really benefit them and create new jobs and they will fall for this like every other panacea for their economy that’s been promised over the years.  In reality, a few people will gain financially.


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: SXSW on September 09, 2016, 11:37:01 am
What are the challenges with reviving the Charles Page industrial corridor? 


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: dbacksfan 2.0 on September 09, 2016, 12:11:33 pm
What are the challenges with reviving the Charles Page industrial corridor?  

The area I was referring to is the stretch from the old ADC to just past where the Knotty Pine was. There is still manufacturing happening there, but I doubt it will be what it was during the 50's through the 70's. At that time it was all petrochemical based, and at times there were three shifts working there to keep up. The shrinking oil industry in the 80's and 90's is what killed it off. If you draw a line from Sheffield Steel to the airport, (basically along the rail line) that was the petrochemical corridor for lack of a better way, and then you had a similar area Oakhurst area around I-44 and 49th W Ave. over to the refineries. I think the other issue along that stretch of Charles Page would be the clean up involved to build something new even if it was manufacturing. It's similar to where Storey Wrecker is, or the old Fin Tube sight.

To revive it, I think you will need a new industrial revolution so to speak, but manufacturing in the US has shrunk so much in the last 30+ years I don't think it will ever be what it was.


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: Conan71 on September 09, 2016, 12:30:10 pm
What are the challenges with reviving the Charles Page industrial corridor? 

Old buildings and crumbling infrastructure are two things which come to mind.  Some of the industries have been sent off-shore or consolidated elsewhere in the state or country, others have found better spots elsewhere around the area like the Port of Catoosa. 

If you mean as to repurpose buildings along the corridor, there’s not much attractive along there for repurposing into other uses, JMO.  There’s some good brick buildings but corrugated steel panel seems to be pretty ubiquitous through there.


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: AquaMan on September 09, 2016, 10:16:38 pm
There is a Frank Lloyd Wright building in the area and of course the old Cord auto manufacturing plant.


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: Conan71 on September 10, 2016, 03:55:09 pm
There is a Frank Lloyd Wright building in the area and of course the old Cord auto manufacturing plant.

Where are those?  I can't place the FLW and was unaware Cord had a place out on the line.  Were they the reproduction Cords or the original plant?


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: AquaMan on September 10, 2016, 04:23:33 pm
The Cord plant is right where the railroad crosses Charles Page diagonally across from the old Knotty Pine Barbeque.  Red brick. Its actually for sale right now. I think it is the original. There was a newer one in Broken Arrow.

The FLW is a bit farther east towards downtown on the south side of Charles Page. Its glass brick windows have been covered up and it has a deco look to it. Seems like it was a valve company. I go by there occasionally so I'll check it out.


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: Conan71 on September 14, 2016, 10:10:55 am
Speaking of Sand Springs and their industrial district here is some good news:

Quote
Major industrial park development at former steel mill site to change heart of Sand Springs

The Sand Springs City Council has entered into an agreement to be a part of a major redevelopment plan for the former Sheffield Steel mill in the middle of the city.

Officials said the project will breathe new life into a very visible part of Sand Springs.

“This will be transformative for generations for the citizens of Sand Springs,” City Manager Elizabeth Gray said.

The Sheffield Steel plant and rail line to Tulsa were purchased by Gerdau Ameristeel, which eventually halted production in 2009. OmniTRAX bought the site in 2014, apparently with plans for redevelopment.

Major highlights of the proposal include the demolition of some of the former mill’s massive metal structures, which directly abut the west side of Oklahoma 97 and can be seen from U.S. 412 toward the south.

About 26 acres of the property are planned for retail development. For city officials, that could translate not only to jobs but also sales-tax revenue.

Per the development agreement Monday, the city eventually would have an option to buy a 10-acre parcel for use as a public-safety complex. Officials said that project has about $10 million through the city’s Vision renewal, which Sand Springs voters approved last fall.

Other public funding needed for the redevelopment would be for construction on Morrow Road along the project’s north border from Oklahoma 97 to Broad Street, Gray said.

“We’ve been working on this for about six months,” Gray said. “But we want to give as much credit to the OmniTRAX people.”

Sand Springs officials had previously planned the public-safety complex for property on the west side of the city, but met public pushback due in part because the proposed facility was not in a central location.

Gray and other officials said building the police, fire, 911 and municipal court facility on part of the former Sheffield Steel property is the perfect opportunity to keep it centralized.

“That’s not a done deal either,” Vice Mayor John Fothergill said. “We’re definitely going to take it to the public.”

Fothergill said he hopes residents agree that a public-private partnership to redevelop the former steel plant is a strong opportunity.

“It was something that we needed anyway,” Fothergill said. “We can put police just about anywhere, but you really want your fire department centrally located.”

Fothergill said OmniTRAX has a track record of buying rail lines and then fueling development all along the lines.

“I think it’s going to be bigger than this,” Fothergill said. “This is just the Sheffield site. That rail goes all the way through Sand Springs and into Tulsa and unincorporated (Tulsa) County property.”

Fothergill pointed at Charles Page Boulevard, which runs along the line, as an area ripe for redevelopment.

Tulsa County Commissioner Karen Keith said she hopes the redevelopment of the property will repair damage to Sand Springs done when the jobs at the steel mill were lost.

“When they lost those jobs, it was just brutal,” Keith said. “Elizabeth (Gray) is a hero in pulling this together. She’s bringing life back into the community.”

jarrel.wade@tulsaworld.com

http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/government/major-industrial-park-development-at-former-steel-mill-site-to/article_63d4aa59-e776-5dd0-b593-a53ac1b34859.html


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: carltonplace on September 14, 2016, 11:02:23 am

North Tulsans will be told this will really benefit them and create new jobs and they will fall for this like every other panacea for their economy that’s been promised over the years.  In reality, a few people will gain financially.

Councilor Jack Henderson is the only vocal person from District 1 that I have heard touting this highway. North Tulsa is easy to get around in...and there is already H75 cutting up neighborhoods. This highway will not be for the residents...it will be for people that want to easily get through north Tulsa on their way to a burb.


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: rebound on September 14, 2016, 11:10:45 am
The Cord plant is right where the railroad crosses Charles Page diagonally across from the old Knotty Pine Barbeque.  Red brick. Its actually for sale right now. I think it is the original. There was a newer one in Broken Arrow.

The FLW is a bit farther east towards downtown on the south side of Charles Page. Its glass brick windows have been covered up and it has a deco look to it. Seems like it was a valve company. I go by there occasionally so I'll check it out.

I'm interested in the possible FLW building. My understanding is that the only FLW building in Tulsa is WestHope. (Currently for sale, if anyone is looking for a really cool fixer-upper.)   

Do you think this is actually FLW, or is it Bruce Goff, or another of FLW's disciples?  (Just checked the Goff site, and can't find anything there, either.)



Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: Townsend on September 14, 2016, 11:19:30 am
Speaking of Sand Springs and their industrial district here is some good news:

Not to be that guy, but let's check back in 5 years and see what happened.


Title: Re: Completing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: Bamboo World on September 14, 2016, 11:41:20 am



North Tulsa is easy to get around in...and there is already H75 cutting up neighborhoods. This highway will not be for the residents...


True.

Something I've admired about Tulsa's development is the relatively pristine natural beauty in the Osage County northwest quadrant, reaching very near to the central business district.  If the Gilcrease Expressway loop is completed, it will chop and spoil that natural beauty, similar to the way the landscape of Tulsa Hills has been ruined by the development along Highway 75 south of 61st Street.  A few years ago, that corridor along Highway 75 was a gorgeous oak forest.
   


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: AquaMan on September 14, 2016, 11:42:47 am
I'm interested in the possible FLW building. My understanding is that the only FLW building in Tulsa is WestHope. (Currently for sale, if anyone is looking for a really cool fixer-upper.)  

Do you think this is actually FLW, or is it Bruce Goff, or another of FLW's disciples?  (Just checked the Goff site, and can't find anything there, either.)



Rebound, you could be right. I'm at the age where I say, "I used to know where I got that story...". It could have been in one of the Tulsa World books on Tulsa history, or it could have been one of the locals who told me. It remember reading it was early in the architect's career. Something about "Equitable Metering" comes to mind but when I was told the story I visited the building and could see Deco elements in its style. Then they covered up the windows and I feared it would be destroyed. I will go by there today.

note: I just visited a list of Deco buildings on Wikipedia and it lists the building as Midwest Equitable Meter at 3130 Charles Page blvd, built in 1929 but it doesn't list the architect. Would have been about the right time for either Goff or FLW. Also of interest in the area is a nice little fire station at 3924 Charles Page blvd built in 1931 by Albert Joseph Love.


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: rebound on September 14, 2016, 01:10:08 pm
Rebound, you could be right. I'm at the age where I say, "I used to know where I got that story...". It could have been in one of the Tulsa World books on Tulsa history, or it could have been one of the locals who told me. It remember reading it was early in the architect's career. Something about "Equitable Metering" comes to mind but when I was told the story I visited the building and could see Deco elements in its style. Then they covered up the windows and I feared it would be destroyed. I will go by there today.

note: I just visited a list of Deco buildings on Wikipedia and it lists the building as Midwest Equitable Meter at 3130 Charles Page blvd, built in 1929 but it doesn't list the architect. Would have been about the right time for either Goff or FLW. Also of interest in the area is a nice little fire station at 3924 Charles Page blvd built in 1931 by Albert Joseph Love.

I've been told since my earlier post that the Meter company building is by Goff.  I hope whatever happens, that building is protected and refurbished.   We've lost too much good architecture in Tulsa.  Thanks for the info!


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: brettakins on February 25, 2017, 09:50:32 am
http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/government/final-stretch-of-gilcrease-expressway-to-be-finished-as-turnpike/article_4245a629-7c5d-511c-a406-ca627f2300fd.html (http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/government/final-stretch-of-gilcrease-expressway-to-be-finished-as-turnpike/article_4245a629-7c5d-511c-a406-ca627f2300fd.html)

Quote
City leaders will announce a plan early next month to complete the Gilcrease Expressway using a unique funding approach that includes turnpike tolls.
Invitations from Mayor G.T. Bynum and Gov. Mary Fallin are being delivered this week to area leaders for a March 10 event at Chandler Park, 6500 W. 21st St., to announce details of the plan.
“It’s a partnership between the city of Tulsa, Tulsa County, Oklahoma Turnpike Authority and Oklahoma Department of Transportation (which are) committed to the completion of the concept of the Gilcrease Expressway,” Tulsa Deputy Mayor Michael Junk told the Tulsa World.
The Gilcrease Expressway project began in the 1950s to create a loop around the city. Finished portions largely include Interstate 44 and Oklahoma 11, and the planned loop has stalled at a necessary crossing of the Arkansas River west of downtown.
The final portion needed to complete the loop, west and northwest of downtown, will require a substantial investment, largely for a bridge across the river.
At current funding rates that come largely from local contributions, the project is scheduled for completion close to 2050 — 100 years after it was started.
The approach being announced March 10 — while still requiring more pieces to fall into place — will be a multisource funding process to complete the loop with a turnpike and a substantially quicker timeline than current funding allows, Junk said.
“It will be a turnpike,” Junk said.
“It’s a result of many months of planning and coordinating. … We have seen the need for access to that side of Tulsa.”
The project has two main goals: to provide road access for development of northwest Tulsa and to lighten the wear and tear that heavy traffic puts on Tulsa’s Inner Dispersal Loop, Junk said.
One key component of turning the new part of the loop into a turnpike is that the city of Tulsa wouldn’t ultimately be on the hook for maintaining the roadway, Junk said.
“There’s going to be a lot of questions regarding the viability of this project,” Junk said. “We have done an extensive study to ensure the need of the project.”

(http://i1265.photobucket.com/albums/jj517/Brettakins/proposed%20route_zpsyeni0iz8.png)


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: Conan71 on February 25, 2017, 04:21:34 pm
http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/government/final-stretch-of-gilcrease-expressway-to-be-finished-as-turnpike/article_4245a629-7c5d-511c-a406-ca627f2300fd.html (http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/government/final-stretch-of-gilcrease-expressway-to-be-finished-as-turnpike/article_4245a629-7c5d-511c-a406-ca627f2300fd.html)

(http://i1265.photobucket.com/albums/jj517/Brettakins/proposed%20route_zpsyeni0iz8.png)


I'm disappointed Bynum would push this forward.  This is either a great example of a solution looking for a problem, or maybe my thinking is not far enough into the future to see the necessity of it and he's being visionary by getting the wheels turning on this.

It turns out I was wrong about how underutilized the Creek Turnpike would be for years after it was completed, but Tulsa was also growing south that that time, especially along the Memorial corridor.  

I could see once Tulsa is filled in completely to the south and east to the neighboring suburbs NW might be a growth corridor, but only if people are willing to sell their nice peaceful parcels of land for subdivisions or apartment developments.

I see how much cities like Austin have been over-built and it has always been my hope that Tulsa would avoid a similar fate.  Perhaps if I were around 20 and more inclined to live in a larger city rather than around 50 and in the process of moving to rural New Mexico, I might have a different perspective on this road and potentially developing some of the last areas of open space close into the city.


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: Conan71 on March 10, 2017, 12:33:39 pm
Private investor found to fund the turnpike:

http://www.tulsaworld.com/homepagelatest/turnpike-involving-private-investor-will-help-secure-million-needed-to/article_d771b587-3253-58d0-9280-123b21f2d5b4.html?utm_source=WhatCountsEmail&utm_medium=Breaking%20News&utm_campaign=Breaking%20News


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: Townsend on March 10, 2017, 12:40:17 pm
Private investor found to fund the turnpike:



Quote
Fallin said finishing the Gilcrease has been a priority for her since she was first elected.
"One of the first things I told Secretary Ridley was, 'Get this thing done,'" she said.

Which she then was heard saying (under her breath) "I'm so full of poo"


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: brettakins on May 10, 2017, 10:15:18 am
Gilcrease Expressway working group meets for first time

http://www.tulsaworld.com/homepagelatest/gilcrease-expressway-working-group-meets-for-first-time/article_931ca3d0-1f40-58f7-939f-797ed3d0d408.html (http://www.tulsaworld.com/homepagelatest/gilcrease-expressway-working-group-meets-for-first-time/article_931ca3d0-1f40-58f7-939f-797ed3d0d408.html)


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: brettakins on November 13, 2017, 09:02:20 pm
Expansion Of Gilcrease Expressway May Happen Sooner Than Planned
http://www.newson6.com/story/36834145/expansion-of-gilcrease-expressway-may-happen-sooner-than-planned (http://www.newson6.com/story/36834145/expansion-of-gilcrease-expressway-may-happen-sooner-than-planned)

Quote
If everything continues as planned, by this time next year we should see construction underway.

“Yes, finally its coming together," Keith said.

The total price tag for the project is $300 million.


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: heironymouspasparagus on November 14, 2017, 08:37:23 am
Big ole bucket of stupid.   Just what we need - spend another $300 million for a road to nowhere.


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: TheArtist on November 14, 2017, 11:36:49 pm
Big ole bucket of stupid.   Just what we need - spend another $300 million for a road to nowhere.


That way the same population of people can spread out even more and have more roads to complain about how bad a shape they are in and at the same time gripe when they are told they need to pay more for the, more roads (and fire, and police, and mowing, and snow removal, pothole repair, lighting, etc. 


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: swake on November 15, 2017, 09:49:19 am
It would help to balance Tulsa's growth around downtown. Some sprawl around cities is inevitable and better there than past Coweta or Collinsville.

That said, that area, despite it being beautiful, will never grow with it's current school district situation no matter what kind of access it has.


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: SXSW on November 15, 2017, 10:48:16 pm
It would help to balance Tulsa's growth around downtown. Some sprawl around cities is inevitable and better there than past Coweta or Collinsville.

That said, that area, despite it being beautiful, will never grow with it's current school district situation no matter what kind of access it has.

You know people said the same thing about the Stapleton neighborhood in Denver when the airport moved.  Developers wanted to turn the site into a residential neighborhood next to some of the city’s worst neighborhoods with bad schools.  So to counter that the local district (DPS) set guidelines that only residents in the new neighborhood could attend the new schools.  And attracted by (then) cheaper new housing a few miles from downtown the area grew and 25 years after the airport closed there are 35,000 people living in Stapleton with 4 elem schools, 2 middle schools and a high school. 


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: TheArtist on November 16, 2017, 07:41:45 am
You know people said the same thing about the Stapleton neighborhood in Denver when the airport moved.  Developers wanted to turn the site into a residential neighborhood next to some of the city’s worst neighborhoods with bad schools.  So to counter that the local district (DPS) set guidelines that only residents in the new neighborhood could attend the new schools.  And attracted by (then) cheaper new housing a few miles from downtown the area grew and 25 years after the airport closed there are 35,000 people living in Stapleton with 4 elem schools, 2 middle schools and a high school. 

Yea another similar example, Glenpool had some of the worst test scores and such in the entire area but once growth began to spill over into that area the scores went up.


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: heironymouspasparagus on November 16, 2017, 11:09:49 am
Yea another similar example, Glenpool had some of the worst test scores and such in the entire area but once growth began to spill over into that area the scores went up.


Some of the kids went to Glenpool in early 80's... not strong schools at that time, but they did ok...then Jenks and that was a hot mess.  If you weren't some of the rich kids - ours weren't - it was not a friendly place to be.  Got out of there and went to Tulsa and Union with a short branch out to BA for a year.  All of which were better for the less rich kids.   But then when a grandkid went to Union High about 5 years ago, after being raised in southern Louisiana schools, her comment was, "that school is soooo ghetto..."



Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: Conan71 on November 16, 2017, 10:47:36 pm
Well, we are all up in arms out in Cimarron about the new trails the mule deer are taking as a by-pass from Philmont to Ted Turner's ranch.  They transit my land all the time and aren't even paying toll.

It's scandalous I tell you!


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: heironymouspasparagus on November 17, 2017, 08:32:18 am
Well, we are all up in arms out in Cimarron about the new trails the mule deer are taking as a by-pass from Philmont to Ted Turner's ranch.  They transit my land all the time and aren't even paying toll.

It's scandalous I tell you!


Sounds like a cook out event is imminent... some good eating there.


We have a herd of about 15 to 20 deer that run across our place out north.  And a couple of very good sized Hackberry trees perfect for a tree stand...er, uh,...playhouse for the grandkids...!  When I get the new freezer, it's gonna be put to good use.  And reduce the protein costs dramatically.






Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: Rattle Trap on November 15, 2018, 10:58:43 am
https://www.tulsaworld.com/homepagelatest/million-bond-approved-for-gilcrease-expressway-turnpike-construction/article_2a4990fd-684c-55b3-ade7-fa50f538e3b5.html

Quote
The Oklahoma Supreme Court on Wednesday approved the issuance of up to $125 million in revenue bonds to help fund construction of the Gilcrease Expressway turnpike in the Tulsa area.

No legal protests were filed with the court, justices noted.

The five-mile, four-lane road construction project will link Interstate 44 with U.S. 412 and complete the western loop around the Tulsa metro area.


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: swake on November 15, 2018, 11:04:53 am
https://www.tulsaworld.com/homepagelatest/million-bond-approved-for-gilcrease-expressway-turnpike-construction/article_2a4990fd-684c-55b3-ade7-fa50f538e3b5.html


God I hate the Tulsa World.

So I have to go to Newsok.com to finishing reading an article at the Tulsa World site about a new Turnpike IN TULSA, but I can't finish the article because I subscribe to the World and not to the Oklahoman.  So what is the point of the Tulsa World even existing, much less me paying for it?


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: Rattle Trap on November 15, 2018, 11:16:31 am
Quote
God I hate the Tulsa World.

So I have to go to Newsok.com to finishing reading an article at the Tulsa World site about a new Turnpike IN TULSA, but I can't finish the article because I subscribe to the World and not to the Oklahoman.  So what is the point of the Tulsa World even existing, much less me paying for it?

My bad I should've just posted the full article lol. The quote I did post is really the only thing news worthy in that article anyways.


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: dbacksfan 2.0 on November 15, 2018, 11:27:41 am
So that makes the turnpike score Tulsa 7 - OKC 3 now?


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: swake on November 15, 2018, 11:32:41 am
My bad I should've just posted the full article lol. The quote I did post is really the only thing news worthy in that article anyways.

Not your fault, it's just the local paper isn't even trying anymore.


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: AngieB on November 15, 2018, 12:06:48 pm
You can paste a TW link into outline.com and get the full article.


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: Conan71 on November 15, 2018, 12:24:57 pm
What an utter waste of money and other resources.  Enjoy your new turnpike!


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: Townsend on November 15, 2018, 12:26:24 pm
What an utter waste of money and other resources.  Enjoy your new turnpike!

Thank you.  It will be the driving force to realizing our dreams


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: Conan71 on November 15, 2018, 12:29:18 pm
Thank you.  It will be the driving force to realizing our dreams

So you can have more, you know, stuff?


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: Townsend on November 15, 2018, 12:35:07 pm
So you can have more, you know, stuff?

So we can destroy even more natural habitat and make things look, you know, Oklahomish


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: dbacksfan 2.0 on November 15, 2018, 12:35:28 pm
What an utter waste of money and other resources.  Enjoy your new turnpike!

I was always waiting for them to turn Highway 75 between Tulsa and B'ville into a turnpike. Talk about a missed opportunity for a cash cow.


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: shavethewhales on November 15, 2018, 01:28:13 pm
While I hate the practice of turnpikes and agree that this is overall a waste, I am selfishly a little excited because it potentially opens up new real estate/development opportunities on this side of town closer to me. West Tulsa has struggled for a long time to attract any kind of decent development action. Most of the good real estate off of I244 is awkward or taken up by railroads and industry. I think the area where this will go over 41st could become a new retail corridor of some kind, which will in turn boost the area around it, and perhaps help out Red Fork a bit.


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: SXSW on November 15, 2018, 08:56:51 pm
So is this just this leg and doesn’t include connecting it to the existing highway north of 412?

(https://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/tulsaworld.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/6/8e/68e41153-418d-5738-bd7c-d483b8b5a4a8/58c87c4b6e4b0.image.jpg)


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: brettakins on November 20, 2018, 12:19:53 pm
https://www.tulsaworld.com/news/local/gilcrease-expressway-toll-road-construction-on-track-for-june-completion/article_688c4ba5-c419-57de-97be-1930f9b7fbb3.html (https://www.tulsaworld.com/news/local/gilcrease-expressway-toll-road-construction-on-track-for-june-completion/article_688c4ba5-c419-57de-97be-1930f9b7fbb3.html)

Quote
Motorists could be driving along a five-mile extension of the Gilcrease Expressway tollway by June 2022 or sooner under a plan outlined Thursday by state transportation officials.


While the five-mile toll road still has a few financial hurdles to clear before construction can begin, Oklahoma Turnpike Authority Executive Director Tim Gatz told a gathering of local and state officials Thursday in Tulsa that his agency has made “really, really good progress” in recent months.


“We’re getting to the point where we’re going to make this project a reality,” Gatz said, during a meeting of the Gilcrease Expressway working group, a mix of local and state officials and companies working on the project.


Gatz said right-of-way acquisition is expected to be complete by early 2019, with about 58 parcels yet to be acquired.


“We’re in pretty good shape there from a right-of-way acquisition standpoint and we do not see those activities presenting any issues on the critical path of the project,” Gatz said.


Utility relocation continues and will be coordinated as construction progresses, Gatz said.


Gatz said a “major milestone” was reached Wednesday when the state Supreme Court greenlighted a request by the OTA to issue construction bonds for the project.


“We’re pretty happy, we’re pleased that the court has gone through and given us that validation,” Gatz said.


About $100 million of the tollway construction costs will be borne initially by the contracting team, Gatz said.


The interim financing will be repaid with a low-interest loan taken out by the OTA from the U.S. Department of Transportation — available through the Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act.


The so-called TIFIA loan will be repaid with toll revenues.


The total cost of the roadway is estimated to cost between $330 million and $340 million.


Gatz said the OTA has in recent months narrowed a list of 22 respondents for qualifications for the tollway project to three teams of contractors. The three-teams, each comprised of two contractors and a financier, will be narrowed to a final recommendation for OTA board consideration by Spring 2019, Gatz said.


The three teams vying for the project are:


• AECOM Energy and Construction/Duet Construction and Wells Fargo Securities


• Manhattan Road and Bridge Co. /Sherwood Construction and RBC Capital Markets


• Lane Construction Corporation/Allen Contracting with KeyBanc Capital Markets


Plans call for construction on the turnpike, which will run from near West Edison Street south to near the intersection of Interstates 244 and 44, to be complete in about three years.


The toll road will cost $1.85 to make the full trip. The tollway will feature no toll booths with drivers paying either via an electronic toll reader or via license plate camera readers.


Building the five-mile, four-lane extension would leave only the stretch from Edison Street to the Tisdale Expressway to be completed in northwest Tulsa.



Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: SXSW on November 20, 2018, 10:10:23 pm
Quote
Building the five-mile, four-lane extension would leave only the stretch from Edison Street to the Tisdale Expressway to be completed in northwest Tulsa.

This seems like it would be a challenging stretch to build with the terrain in that area.  What are the odds this part doesn’t get built?


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: Conan71 on November 21, 2018, 05:25:43 pm
So is this just this leg and doesn’t include connecting it to the existing highway north of 412?

(https://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/tulsaworld.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/6/8e/68e41153-418d-5738-bd7c-d483b8b5a4a8/58c87c4b6e4b0.image.jpg)


I'm failing to see the cost benefit of this, even for W. 21st st. industry.  I-244 ostensibly was aligned the way it was with its exits to help link those businesses as well as the rail yards to the Interstate system.   


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: ELG4America on December 14, 2018, 09:25:03 am
I would argue that the long term benefit of completing this loop is pushing traffic out from our city center. The more we can loop pass-through traffic around the edges of the city the more likely we can eventually reclaim land in our city center for development.


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: Rattle Trap on December 14, 2018, 09:50:58 am
Quote
I would argue that the long term benefit of completing this loop is pushing traffic out from our city center. The more we can loop pass-through traffic around the edges of the city the more likely we can eventually reclaim land in our city center for development.

I mostly agree. I see the criticism that there is no real need for this to be done now, given the part of town it's in, but city planning is about preparing for future growth and staying ahead of the problems, right? The city and state needs to be proactive rather than reactive to the increasing traffic in our cities.

I grew up in Owasso, graduated high school there, and am moving back post college. I've seen the town grow from a population of 10k-15k, to pushing 40k now. The main roads the town is centered are all behind the times and should have been expanded at least a decade ago. For some reason they decided to only expand 169 up to bird creek, which solved literally nothing in regards to traffic coming into town. We probably won't see a real 169 expansion for at least another decade.

I also think of OKC's current state in that there apparently was no thought put in to highway expansions over their last 20 years of growth they've seen. Now they have a huge back log of road projects and terrible traffic for a metro of "only" 1.5 million.

A good example of something proactive being done is the expansion of Turner Turnpike. We don't necessarily NEED it to be 6 lanes right now, but by the time they expand the entire stretch from Tulsa to OKC, we probably will. Or maybe they just want a reason to hike the toll again...who knows.

I guess my point is that I'm good with doing this project before we....really need it? lol


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: patric on December 14, 2018, 11:42:49 am

A good example of something proactive being done is the expansion of Turner Turnpike. We don't necessarily NEED it to be 6 lanes right now, but by the time they expand the entire stretch from Tulsa to OKC, we probably will. Or maybe they just want a reason to hike the toll again...who knows.


We wouldnt know what to do with a toll hike that wasnt backdoor funding for the Department of Public Safety.

So when does motor vehicle use plateau?  Probably not for a long time, but at some point in our lifetimes we are likely to come to the conclusion we have too many 6-8-12-lane roads.


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: brettakins on July 23, 2019, 03:16:52 pm
https://www.tulsaworld.com/news/contract-awarded-for-gilcrease-expressway-west-loop-work-to-start/article_83e162e6-a63f-51c2-bcec-9f044964607b.html (https://www.tulsaworld.com/news/contract-awarded-for-gilcrease-expressway-west-loop-work-to-start/article_83e162e6-a63f-51c2-bcec-9f044964607b.html)


Quote
OKLAHOMA City — The Oklahoma Turnpike Authority on Tuesday set in motion a nearly $261 million project for construction on the west loop of the Gilcrease Expressway.


The contract was awarded to a partnership involving AECOM, an engineering and construction firm based in Los Angeles, and Duit Construction Co., based in Edmond.


Work is expected to start by the end of the year, said Jack Damrill, an OTA spokesman


It is expected to be finished in February 2022, said Tim Gatz, OTA director and transportation secretary.


The toll road will include a bridge over the Arkansas River.


The project consists of construction of a new, four-lane highway beginning where the existing Gilcrease Expressway connects to Interstate 44 just south of West 51st Street South and ends just north of U.S. 412 at Edison Street.


It is part of the Driving Forward program, a turnpike expansion and improvement initiative for six roads.


“I look forward to getting the project under construction,” Gatz said.



Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: heironymouspasparagus on August 06, 2019, 03:59:57 pm
I mostly agree. I see the criticism that there is no real need for this to be done now, given the part of town it's in, but city planning is about preparing for future growth and staying ahead of the problems, right? The city and state needs to be proactive rather than reactive to the increasing traffic in our cities.


A good example of something proactive being done is the expansion of Turner Turnpike. We don't necessarily NEED it to be 6 lanes right now, but by the time they expand the entire stretch from Tulsa to OKC, we probably will. Or maybe they just want a reason to hike the toll again...who knows.

I guess my point is that I'm good with doing this project before we....really need it? lol

Sorry I missed this months ago...

The Turner should have been 6 lane all the way for over 25 years!  I have driven that mess regularly for the last 14 years - on the order of 8 - 10 trips a week.  It is ridiculous.  If we continue to refuse to make a high speed train option, fix that stinkin' sorry a$$ road for real !    And not just slobbering on 2" of new assfault every 3 years!

The wide section is good, just too much asphalt and too short.



Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: brettakins on October 14, 2019, 11:41:04 pm
(http://i1265.photobucket.com/albums/jj517/Brettakins/Mobile%20Uploads/Screenshot_20191015-003539_Facebook_zps2e9w1haw.jpg)


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: shavethewhales on October 16, 2019, 12:15:30 pm
Glad they are finally starting. If nothing else, it's nice to have the construction activity and investment here in Tulsa. OTA is also about to start on the next phase of Turner expansion next summer. It will involve a big change up of the HWY66/Turnpike entrance area next to Oakhurst.


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: brettakins on October 23, 2019, 06:27:27 am
https://www.tulsaworld.com/news/local/officials-break-ground-on-west-leg-of-gilcrease-expressway/article_258e6f99-4b3a-575a-8d2b-ccb569c968b5.html (https://www.tulsaworld.com/news/local/officials-break-ground-on-west-leg-of-gilcrease-expressway/article_258e6f99-4b3a-575a-8d2b-ccb569c968b5.html)

Quote
After more than 50 years of maybes, somedays and possibilities, the west leg of the Gilcrease Expressway took a giant step toward reality at a groundbreaking ceremony Tuesday morning.

At the corner of 56th West Avenue and 21st Street, Gov. Kevin Stitt, Mayor G.T. Bynum and County Commissioner Karen Keith gathered with other local and state officials to commemorate the final leg of the expressway first envisioned in 1961.

Bynum thanked former Oklahoma Secretary of Transportation Gary Ridley for his work on getting the project started. He said the new highway will open new opportunities for parts of Tulsa left out of economic growth elsewhere in the city.

“Knowing that both north Tulsa and west Tulsa for so many years took a back seat to the rest of the city when it came to economic development,” Bynum said. “There are so many people who kept pushing to continue, year by year incrementally assembling funding needed for the land to build this expressway.

“Now here we are, in position where this thing is going to be built over the next three years, and it is going to unlock the economies in north Tulsa and west Tulsa in a way they’ve never been before.”

Tim Duit, with Edmond-based Duit Construction, said construction on the $261 million project will begin in earnest in January after the holidays. With good weather, the expressway should open in March 2022.

Complete with shovels and Oklahoma Turnpike Authority hardhats, officials broke ground just south of 21st Street.

Stitt said the project stands to spur further growth in the Tulsa area and demonstrate the state’s economic strength.

“I’m just so excited to showcase our state and our city with this new expressway,” Stitt said.

“This is going to be fantastic. When you think about this route, the economic development, I’m just so excited for that. We’re going to recruit more companies here. It’s going to alleviate a lot of the traffic issues.”

The west leg will connect the leg spanning north Tulsa to 51st Street near the I-44/I-244 western split in west Tulsa. It will include multiple bridges, including over Charles Page Boulevard and the Arkansas River west of downtown.

Keith — whom Bynum called “the patron saint of long term causes in our community, and she always ends up being right” — said she’s ecstatic that the expressway is no longer a shelved plan for the future.

“We all know too well how important this new transportation link is,” Keith said. “Gilcrease is a safety valve, an additional and much-needed connection for first responders, and a less congested route for Chandler Park, west Tulsa and Sand Springs.”


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: brettakins on March 10, 2021, 05:22:37 pm
(https://scontent-dfw5-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/158136464_853611341883431_8674800942338949635_o.jpg?_nc_cat=111&ccb=1-3&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=QOYdGOTkFckAX8_KRl9&_nc_ht=scontent-dfw5-1.xx&oh=8c48468617ea2589add11df2db8fac4e&oe=606DF0C5)

(https://scontent-dfw5-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/p960x960/157425981_853611321883433_8694441481189045493_o.jpg?_nc_cat=109&ccb=1-3&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=RpB7jELDbGwAX_YyN1S&_nc_ht=scontent-dfw5-2.xx&tp=6&oh=0d3cc9309bd941b313d816e13333fd51&oe=606E1BC6)

(https://scontent-dfw5-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/158220396_853611371883428_20889407294659137_o.jpg?_nc_cat=101&ccb=1-3&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=MAZbkihqXX4AX9v0ppH&_nc_ht=scontent-dfw5-1.xx&oh=02fe2038a1cb7f04e34d294d8fcddf53&oe=606E63C0)

March 5th update


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: SXSW on March 16, 2021, 10:35:53 pm
That will be a great skyline viewpoint looking east going northbound on the new bridge.


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: brettakins on September 28, 2021, 03:01:57 pm
https://tulsaworld.com/news/gilcrease-expressway-extension-72-complete-ota-official-says/article_a3964672-1fc3-11ec-aba4-833640c77cd2.html (https://tulsaworld.com/news/gilcrease-expressway-extension-72-complete-ota-official-says/article_a3964672-1fc3-11ec-aba4-833640c77cd2.html)

(https://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/tulsaworld.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/8/d4/8d428bda-1fe9-11ec-97d8-a7ac551862f6/615251d1e82e4.image.jpg?resize=1200%2C800)

(https://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/tulsaworld.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/9/28/928977d4-1fe9-11ec-87e8-bb1980f9be98/615251dac46d2.image.jpg?resize=1200%2C800)

(https://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/tulsaworld.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/9/c6/9c642330-1fe9-11ec-ae12-279780d687b3/615251eb52150.image.jpg?resize=1200%2C789)

Quote
The Gilcrease Expressway extension is 72% complete, Oklahoma Turnpike Authority Deputy Director Joe Echelle said Monday following a meeting of the authority’s board.
The project consists of five miles of new four-lane toll road beginning where the existing Gilcrease Expressway connects to Interstate 44 just south of West 51st Street and ends just north of U.S. 412 at Edison Street. It will provide for a new route across the Arkansas River west of downtown Tulsa.

The $336 million stretch of road is expected to be opened in May or June 2022, Echelle said.
The roadway is part of the Driving Forward program, an expansion and improvement initiative for six turnpikes announced during former Gov. Mary Fallin’s administration.

The entire Driving Forward initiative is 96% complete, Echelle said





Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: SXSW on September 29, 2021, 10:09:08 am
Is there a plan to complete the loop from Edison to 41st W Ave?  I think it would roughly follow 57th W Ave and 53rd W Ave north then head back northeast to join up with the existing highway at 41st W Ave

Interested to hear more about the new trails that are part of this project.  I assume this connects to the Katy trail north of the river then goes across the bridge.  My hope is that the river trail eventually gets extended past I-44 along the south bank and then connects to this bridge so you can do a loop using that trail and the Katy trail

(https://ktul.com/resources/media/9d2ae461-3a62-49eb-b872-5e7f9482fc3b-large16x9_GilcreaseprojectOTAjuly232019.jpg?1563919783556)

(https://www.publicradiotulsa.org/sites/kwgs/files/201910/gilcrease_-_arkansas_river_bridge.jpg)



Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: brettakins on October 14, 2021, 07:37:09 am
https://www.newson6.com/story/61675af75030520c10a636c5/skynews-6-video:-progress-on-gilcrease-expressway-extension-project-?fbclid=IwAR2MMExxN1xPgj4jdbA7ZSwz3ULxt3VeyQH3M0HNk2uas67hsXtCiAGMaWA (https://www.newson6.com/story/61675af75030520c10a636c5/skynews-6-video:-progress-on-gilcrease-expressway-extension-project-?fbclid=IwAR2MMExxN1xPgj4jdbA7ZSwz3ULxt3VeyQH3M0HNk2uas67hsXtCiAGMaWA)

Quote
TULSA, Oklahoma - Construction crews are making progress on the Gilcrease Expressway extension that will connect Highway 412 with I-44.
News On 6 has been following this project for a few years now and has seen major progress over that time. The Oklahoma Turnpike Authority said the five-mile stretch is expected to relieve congestion during peak travel times from Interstate 244 and Highway 97.

The Gilcrease Expressway Extension will connect Highway 412 and, ultimately, the Tisdale with I-44 on the west side of town.

The bridge being built over the Arkansas River will cross at 57th West Avenue, and this project will cost around $330 million.

The project was started late in 2019 and Turnpike Authority Leaders expect the highway to be open by November of 2022.




Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: brettakins on January 15, 2022, 02:13:36 am
(https://i.ibb.co/XW8tpKG/61dcb81bf1039-image.jpg)
(https://i.ibb.co/55vrwXn/61dcb8182417e-image.jpg)
(https://i.ibb.co/fxPCRyw/61dcb8127c7a2-image.jpg)


https://tulsaworld.com/news/local/gilcrease-bridge-over-arkansas-river-nearing-completion-tollway-expected-to-open-in-summer/article_d2c14b80-71b3-11ec-8c3e-8b19606a1a79.html#tracking-source=home-top-story-1 (https://tulsaworld.com/news/local/gilcrease-bridge-over-arkansas-river-nearing-completion-tollway-expected-to-open-in-summer/article_d2c14b80-71b3-11ec-8c3e-8b19606a1a79.html#tracking-source=home-top-story-1)


Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: brettakins on August 03, 2022, 05:16:23 pm
https://tulsaworld.com/news/local/watch-now-gilcrease-turnpike-nears-completion/article_649ca430-0f5e-11ed-ba06-fb386c84e8b0.html (https://tulsaworld.com/news/local/watch-now-gilcrease-turnpike-nears-completion/article_649ca430-0f5e-11ed-ba06-fb386c84e8b0.html)

Quote
Work on what is being called the Gilcrease Turnpike is wrapping up, with the $340 million project on the western extension of the Gilcrease Expressway expected to be open to traffic sometime near the end of August to early September, officials said.


A Tulsa World tour of the highway on Friday revealed some of the work left: guardrail and cable barrier installation, wiring on highway lights, concrete work on the adjoining foot/bike path, highway striping and the addition of toll cost signs.

Work on the highway was paused Friday due to rain, but it will resume next week.

Gary Evans, with the consulting firm EST, said toll cost signs are among the last pieces to be ordered for the project.

The cost to motorists to travel the state’s shortest turnpike has yet to be decided. The Oklahoma Turnpike Authority could decide at its next meeting how much to charge motorists for using the five-mile long highway that connects west Tulsa and Sand Springs to Interstate 44.

Last September, OTA officials said the toll to travel the entire turnpike would be about $2, although specific rates for individual sections had not been estimated.

The Oklahoma Turnpike Authority’s next regular board meeting is scheduled for Aug. 23.

T.J. Dill, Oklahoma Turnpike Authority director of construction, said the contractor has set Aug. 29 as the date for the project to be substantially complete. Turnpike officials will then review the work, a process that could take a few weeks, before opening the divided four-lane highway to the public, he said.

Once open, the toll road will connect Interstate 44 just south of West 51st Street to Edison Street, just north of the Arkansas River and U.S. 412.

The project is a collaboration between city, county, state, federal and other officials.

Officially deemed Oklahoma 344, the toll road eventually will connect on the north side to the Gilcrease Expressway, completing the long-awaited transportation loop around the city of Tulsa.

Signs along the highway indicate the speed limit to be 70 mph. The Oklahoma Highway Patrol will have jurisdiction on the turnpike, as it does by contract on other OTA turnpikes.

The highway will feature 22 bridges, including two spanning the Arkansas River.

A 10-foot wide concrete trail will follow the highway’s general alignment, with the path generally on the west side of the road.

Turnpike officials have said they expect about 4,000 vehicles a day to use the highway by the end of the first year it is open.

The road will be owned by the Oklahoma Turnpike Authority and will include three cashless toll-collection points.

Cashless collection methods include PikePass and PlatePay, where the bill is sent to the person who holds the registration on a vehicle that passes through a toll point.






Title: Re: Completeing the Gilcrease Hills expressway
Post by: tulsabug on August 04, 2022, 09:13:25 am
Y'know - since they're charging admission to drive on them you'd think they could at least make the bridges slightly interesting. I mean - damn - that's an ugly SOB.