The Tulsa Forum by TulsaNow

Not At My Table - Political Discussions => National & International Politics => Topic started by: guido911 on October 01, 2014, 12:40:12 pm



Title: Ebola
Post by: guido911 on October 01, 2014, 12:40:12 pm
Well most now know that in the Dallas area the first case has been diagnosed in this country. No need to harp on how relatively close to Tulsa this is. I am surprised that it still managed to reach this country. Tingles has weighed in, so you know we nearly had a spittle situation.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2014/09/30/chris_matthews_vs_ezekiel_emanuel_on_ebola_obama_said_it_was_unlikely_it_has_happened_its_here.html





Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Gaspar on October 01, 2014, 12:58:51 pm
Well most now know that in the Dallas area the first case has been diagnosed in this country. No need to harp on how relatively close to Tulsa this is. I am surprised that it still managed to reach this country. Tingles has weighed in, so you know we nearly had a spittle situation.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2014/09/30/chris_matthews_vs_ezekiel_emanuel_on_ebola_obama_said_it_was_unlikely_it_has_happened_its_here.html



We're all set.  Went out and stocked up as soon as the president announced that the possibility of Ebola in the US was remote.
(http://pbs.twimg.com/media/By3MofyIAAAvY3y.jpg)

ThinkProgress is already using it to push Obamacare as the salvation.  USA Today is now reporting a possible second case.  Only a matter of time until Ebola becomes more politics than disease. 



Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: heironymouspasparagus on October 01, 2014, 01:16:29 pm
Spent a couple days in Dallas last week.  Drove up highway 75, by the Presby hospital and stopped at In & Out Burger in the area to eat - just south of Caruth Haven Lane.  Counting the days.... 21 isn't it??




Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Gaspar on October 01, 2014, 01:21:34 pm
Spent a couple days in Dallas last week.  Drove up highway 75, by the Presby hospital and stopped at In & Out Burger in the area to eat - just south of Caruth Haven Lane.  Counting the days.... 21 isn't it??




10 for Ebola, then a headshot is the only remedy.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: heironymouspasparagus on October 01, 2014, 01:48:43 pm
10 for Ebola, then a headshot is the only remedy.


Well, I ain't sweating it....I can dodge both those bullets....


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: ARGUS on October 01, 2014, 01:52:36 pm
Your eyes got me dreamin' Your eyes got me....ebola eyes :)


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: heironymouspasparagus on October 01, 2014, 01:57:36 pm
10 for Ebola, then a headshot is the only remedy.


Or I could just go ahead and die a slow, agonizing, painful death in a slippery pool of coagulating blood....



Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Conan71 on October 01, 2014, 03:22:31 pm
We're all set.  Went out and stocked up as soon as the president announced that the possibility of Ebola in the US was remote.
(http://pbs.twimg.com/media/By3MofyIAAAvY3y.jpg)

ThinkProgress is already using it to push Obamacare as the salvation.  USA Today is now reporting a possible second case.  Only a matter of time until Ebola becomes more politics than disease. 



Someone has already come to the reach-around logic that ebola is caused by global warming climate change climate anomaly aw hell, you know what I’m trying to say.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: guido911 on October 01, 2014, 03:32:35 pm
It's Bush's fault---although Obama lied about the likelihood of Ebola hitting the U.S. Tingles told me.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: patric on October 01, 2014, 05:11:51 pm

The hospital let the patient go.

 


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: guido911 on October 01, 2014, 05:39:17 pm
The hospital let the patient go.

 

It's the hospital's fault? ::) I'm surprised you didn't accuse the Dallas PD of doing something. Too much finger pointing going on when it obviously Rick Perry's fault.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: guido911 on October 01, 2014, 06:40:12 pm
Panic is starting to set in. Parents keeping kids home from school. Can't blame them I suppose.

http://www.star-telegram.com/2014/10/01/6165611/officials-say-only-one-ebola-case.html?rh=1


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: guido911 on October 02, 2014, 03:14:40 pm
I'm sorry about the source for this development, because Hot Air is obviously biased and cannot report. But this is just too perfect.

http://hotair.com/archives/2014/10/02/flashback-senator-obama-rips-bush-for-being-unprepared-for-avian-flu-epidemic/


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Conan71 on October 02, 2014, 04:11:00 pm
I'm sorry about the source for this development, because Hot Air is obviously biased and cannot report. But this is just too perfect.

http://hotair.com/archives/2014/10/02/flashback-senator-obama-rips-bush-for-being-unprepared-for-avian-flu-epidemic/

Senator Obama vs. President Obama always makes for good entertainment.


Title: Re:
Post by: Gaspar on October 02, 2014, 05:36:02 pm
They are always running against each other.


Title: Re:
Post by: guido911 on October 02, 2014, 07:02:00 pm
They are always running against each other.

I agree. But by the same token, this is still Bush's fault (and Rick Perry's fault) that Ebola hit the U.S. If Bush had only did a better job with Avian flu and Katrina as Obama pointed out...


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: swake on October 03, 2014, 10:04:07 am
 Obama is taking Ebola seriously. It’s Republicans that are fighting him on funding for fighting it in Africa, remember?

Ebola hasn’t killed anyone in the United States and isn’t likely to ever kill more than a handful either. At the same time the known seasonal flu strains we currently deal with are going to kill somewhere around 35,000 Americans just this year. Ebola is not the flu. While it’s very often deadly, it’s not very contagious.

Flu is far more dangerous and new more deadly flu strains that jump species that we don’t have inoculations for are a huge health concern. The Spanish Flu killed 675,000 Americans in 1918, another Flu outbreak in the late 50s killed almost 70,000 people.  Swine flu jumped to humans in 2010 but didn’t turn out to be a deadly strain in humans. A bad flu epidemic today could kill hundreds of thousands or even millions of Americans before we are able to develop inoculations. Ebola is not a danger to do that in an advanced country with modern medicine, it just doesn’t spread that easily. Flu does.

You may now carry on with your silly reality challenged hysterics over that awful black man in the White House.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Townsend on October 03, 2014, 10:26:27 am

You may now carry on with your silly reality challenged hysterics over that awful black man in the White House.


That's what's keeping the conservative GOP hunkered together.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Conan71 on October 03, 2014, 11:06:08 am

If we are taking this so serious, why are we allowing travel to and from countries currently impacted by Ebola?  Just now trending is a Nigerian with ebola-like symptoms who is being evaluated at a D.C. area hospital.

The cavalier attitude toward lax immigration policy has very real consequences.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: swake on October 03, 2014, 11:12:33 am
If we are taking this so serious, why are we allowing travel to and from countries currently impacted by Ebola?  Just now trending is a Nigerian with ebola-like symptoms who is being evaluated at a D.C. area hospital.

The cavalier attitude toward lax immigration policy has very real consequences.

Why would you ban travel from Nigeria anyway, they had a total of 19 confirmed cases in a country of 175 million people with no new cases in the last 30 days.

Him being checked IS being cautious. Very cautious.

Stop the panic and outrage machine.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: guido911 on October 03, 2014, 12:34:59 pm


You may now carry on with your silly reality challenged hysterics over that awful black man in the White House.


Screw you and your racism allegations. Jack@ss.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: patric on October 03, 2014, 12:38:19 pm

Ebola hasn’t killed anyone in the United States


If I may play the devil's advocate; there were likely doctors in Haskell County Kansas saying something similar in 1918.

Hysterics arent helpful, but what is hurting us is complacency and negligence.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: heironymouspasparagus on October 03, 2014, 12:39:56 pm
Screw you and your racism allegations. Jack@ss.


Catchy comeback....


Come on, guido, I have seen you do better!  So do it!!  Take a few deep breaths, exhale slowly...pause to reflect and then write.  It seems like you are getting too caught up in the trivia and minutia of day to day activities.  Take a short break....have a few 'yoga' moments....then resume!









Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: guido911 on October 03, 2014, 12:40:02 pm
If we are taking this so serious, why are we allowing travel to and from countries currently impacted by Ebola?  Just now trending is a Nigerian with ebola-like symptoms who is being evaluated at a D.C. area hospital.

The cavalier attitude toward lax immigration policy has very real consequences.

Because former president Bush was just gawd awful about helping Africa deal with disease. And it's the GOP's fault that Obama said Ebola hitting this country was "unlikely" just two weeks ago. But perhaps the GOP's funding obstinacy just coincidentally happened in the past 2 weeks. And it's the GOP's that controls immigration. Blah blah blah.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: heironymouspasparagus on October 03, 2014, 12:41:52 pm
If I may play the devil's advocate; there were likely doctors in Haskell County Kansas saying something similar in 1918.

Hysterics arent helpful, but what is hurting us is complacency and negligence.


Grandmother was kept indoors during that in the KC area.  Lived in quarters above a store, and she would sit in the front window watching the funeral processions come by.  At the peak, there were a few every day just on their street.




Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: guido911 on October 03, 2014, 12:45:04 pm

Catchy comeback....


Come on, guido, I have seen you do better!  So do it!!  Take a few deep breaths, exhale slowly...pause to reflect and then write.  It seems like you are getting too caught up in the trivia and minutia of day to day activities.  Take a short break....have a few 'yoga' moments....then resume!





No need. I have maxed out with the likes of you and your racism BS.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Conan71 on October 03, 2014, 01:07:36 pm
Because former president Bush was just gawd awful about helping Africa deal with disease. And it's the GOP's fault that Obama said Ebola hitting this country was "unlikely" just two weeks ago. But perhaps the GOP's funding obstinacy just coincidentally happened in the past 2 weeks. And it's the GOP's that controls immigration. Blah blah blah.

We’ve already dropped $100mm on Ebola.  There’s discretionary dollars available to the military they can use within their existing budget framework.  Libtards are conflating the issue by making a counter-proposal to Obama’s budget request for FY ’15 from Congress as refusing to lend a hand.

Blaming the GOP for all his troubles simply highlights his lack of leadership.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Conan71 on October 03, 2014, 01:09:13 pm
Why would you ban travel from Nigeria anyway, they had a total of 19 confirmed cases in a country of 175 million people with no new cases in the last 30 days.

Him being checked IS being cautious. Very cautious.

Stop the panic and outrage machine.

Every epidemic starts small, swake, including influenza.  One way to stop it’s spread is to restrict where your citizens travel and who you allow in from foreign countries.

No panic and outrage here, it’s a simple and obvious precaution which is being ignored.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: swake on October 03, 2014, 01:41:36 pm
Every epidemic starts small, swake, including influenza.  One way to stop it’s spread is to restrict where your citizens travel and who you allow in from foreign countries.

No panic and outrage here, it’s a simple and obvious precaution which is being ignored.


Again, 175 million people, 19 cases of Ebola and no new ones in the last 30 days? Close that border? Now that we have a case should Europe and Canada close our borders? By your logic should all other countries close their borders with us anyway because of our problems with Flu?

Ebola is a terrible disease that is striking poor countries with poor sanitation and poor medical care. We are not that. Stop with the panic. Ebola only spreads when a person comes into contact with an infected person's bodily fluids and only for one week while they are showing symptoms.  

Anyway, the three most impacted countries have 22 million people with 7,157 cases of Ebola so far, so .033% of those countries populations are infected. These aren't big numbers, yet.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Hoss on October 03, 2014, 01:47:56 pm

Again, 175 million people, 19 cases of Ebola and no new ones in the last 30 days? Close that boarder? Now that we have a case should Europe and Canada close our borders? By your logic should all other countries close their boarders with us anyway because of our problems with Flu?

Ebola is a terrible disease that is striking poor countries with poor sanitation and poor medical care. We are not that. Stop with the panic. Ebola only spreads when a person comes into contact with an infected person's bodily fluids and only for one week while they are showing symptoms. 

Anyway, the three most impacted countries have 22 million people with 7,157 cases of Ebola so far, so .033% of those countries populations are infected. These aren't big numbers, yet.

Alot of it has to do with misinformation being spread and suggesting that the virus could mutate into becoming airborne.  Horse puckey, say most doctors.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/ebola/11138196/Suggesting-Ebola-will-become-airborne-is-irresponsible-say-experts.html


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Conan71 on October 03, 2014, 02:07:38 pm

Again, 175 million people, 19 cases of Ebola and no new ones in the last 30 days? Close that boarder? Now that we have a case should Europe and Canada close our borders? By your logic should all other countries close their boarders with us anyway because of our problems with Flu?

Ebola is a terrible disease that is striking poor countries with poor sanitation and poor medical care. We are not that. Stop with the panic. Ebola only spreads when a person comes into contact with an infected person's bodily fluids and only for one week while they are showing symptoms. 

Anyway, the three most impacted countries have 22 million people with 7,157 cases of Ebola so far, so .033% of those countries populations are infected. These aren't big numbers, yet.

But they can be.  So you favor allowing possibly infected people into the U.S. from Liberia as well?  Here’s the problem: with an incubation period of up to 21 days, there could be many people walking around with the disease who have no idea they have it. 


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: RecycleMichael on October 03, 2014, 02:08:30 pm
I once thought I had West Nile Virus. It turned out to be Senile Virus.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Breadburner on October 03, 2014, 02:44:39 pm
I once thought I had West Nile Virus. It turned out to be Senile Virus.

Penile Virus is more like it.....


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: heironymouspasparagus on October 03, 2014, 03:07:24 pm
No need. I have maxed out with the likes of you and your racism BS.

??

I don't have any racism BS.  It's just certain parts of the populace that have that....


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: guido911 on October 03, 2014, 05:15:48 pm
??

I don't have any racism BS.  It's just certain parts of the populace that have that....


Not meant for you.  :-[


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: swake on October 03, 2014, 05:55:28 pm
Not meant for you.  :-[

Did I hurt your little privileged feelings? I feel so bad.



Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: swake on October 03, 2014, 06:01:19 pm
But they can be.  So you favor allowing possibly infected people into the U.S. from Liberia as well?  Here’s the problem: with an incubation period of up to 21 days, there could be many people walking around with the disease who have no idea they have it. 


Average incubation this go round is 4-6 days and this is day 6 of this guy being in the hospital in isolation. So far so good that no one else is ill. I am a bit surprised at this with his projectile vomiting all over his family and friends, but it's good news they aren't sick yet. It's looking like he may well be an isolated case.



Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Conan71 on October 03, 2014, 08:58:11 pm

Average incubation this go round is 4-6 days and this is day 6 of this guy being in the hospital in isolation. So far so good that no one else is ill. I am a bit surprised at this with his projectile vomiting all over his family and friends, but it's good news they aren't sick yet. It's looking like he may well be an isolated case.



Cool, so you’d have no problem taking your family on vacation to Nigeria or Liberia?


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: swake on October 04, 2014, 10:59:41 am
Cool, so you’d have no problem taking your family on vacation to Nigeria or Liberia?

It's ten days since this guy became contagious, why isn't there a massive outbreak yet? The average incubation period is 4-6 days and the man in Dallas was sick after 9 days. Where are the other sick people, shouldn't SOMEONE have gotten sick yet?

If you listened to right wing radio and Newscorp non-news machine you'd think that the world is ending and it's all Obama's fault when so far there is exactly ONE case of Ebola and it keeps not spreading.

What's more, no one that has been brought out of Africa to be cared for in western countries has died. None, all recovered. Those American healthcare workers that The Toupee and Fox wanted kept out of the US because they were going to spread the disease and kill us all? All have been cured and no one else was infected.

Fox/Newscorp/Rush/Clear Channel are all lying to you. They are spreading fear because it makes them money. Quit being so damn gullible.  


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Ed W on October 04, 2014, 11:08:20 am
Information is the antidote for fear. As yet, there is no known antidote for stupidity.

(http://media.npr.org/assets/img/2014/10/01/ebolar0_custom-51327a6a4853632602173cc2fa7ad8339aac5630-s4-c85.jpg)

http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2014/10/02/352983774/no-seriously-how-contagious-is-ebola?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=npr&utm_term=nprnews&utm_content=202402 (http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2014/10/02/352983774/no-seriously-how-contagious-is-ebola?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=npr&utm_term=nprnews&utm_content=202402)


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Hoss on October 04, 2014, 11:14:41 am
Information is the antidote for fear. As yet, there is no known antidote for stupidity.

(http://media.npr.org/assets/img/2014/10/01/ebolar0_custom-51327a6a4853632602173cc2fa7ad8339aac5630-s4-c85.jpg)

http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2014/10/02/352983774/no-seriously-how-contagious-is-ebola?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=npr&utm_term=nprnews&utm_content=202402 (http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2014/10/02/352983774/no-seriously-how-contagious-is-ebola?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=npr&utm_term=nprnews&utm_content=202402)

Maybe we need to start quarantining those with Hep C...  ::)


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: swake on October 04, 2014, 11:38:15 am
Cool, so you’d have no problem taking your family on vacation to Nigeria or Liberia?


Nigeria sure. Again, 175 million people, 19 total cases and none in the last 30 days. The "outbreak" is over there. Dallas is more dangerous.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Townsend on October 04, 2014, 01:27:28 pm
The Dallas patient has taken a turn for the not so healthy.

It's time to bring in the faith healers.

Someone get Benny Hinn on the horn. 

Surely he'll be okay with Christ working through him right?

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1b/Profile_Photo_of_Benny_Hinn.png)


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Red Arrow on October 04, 2014, 03:31:18 pm
It's ten days since this guy became contagious, why isn't there a massive outbreak yet? The average incubation period is 4-6 days and the man in Dallas was sick after 9 days.

So then what is the up to 21 days number I've heard?



Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Hoss on October 04, 2014, 03:33:58 pm
So then what is the up to 21 days number I've heard?



CDC says it, so media outlets will probably use it.

http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/symptoms/index.html

Note that they say the average symptomatic time is 8-10 days.



Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Red Arrow on October 04, 2014, 03:36:19 pm
CDC says it, so media outlets will probably use it.
Note that they say the average symptomatic time is 8-10 days.

Thank you.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: swake on October 04, 2014, 04:29:34 pm
So then what is the up to 21 days number I've heard?



21 days is the maximum incubation period that has been seen. Once an exposed person passes 21 days they can be considered in the clear. Average is 4-6 days.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Red Arrow on October 04, 2014, 05:15:43 pm
21 days is the maximum incubation period that has been seen. Once an exposed person passes 21 days they can be considered in the clear. Average is 4-6 days.

Courtesy of Hoss and the CDC:


http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/symptoms/index.html

Symptoms of Ebola include

Fever (greater than 38.6°C or 101.5°F)
Severe headache
Muscle pain
Weakness
Diarrhea
Vomiting
Abdominal (stomach) pain
Unexplained hemorrhage (bleeding or bruising)
Symptoms may appear anywhere from 2 to 21 days after exposure to Ebola, but the average is 8 to 10 days.



Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Conan71 on October 04, 2014, 05:34:07 pm
It's ten days since this guy became contagious, why isn't there a massive outbreak yet? The average incubation period is 4-6 days and the man in Dallas was sick after 9 days. Where are the other sick people, shouldn't SOMEONE have gotten sick yet?

If you listened to right wing radio and Newscorp non-news machine you'd think that the world is ending and it's all Obama's fault when so far there is exactly ONE case of Ebola and it keeps not spreading.

What's more, no one that has been brought out of Africa to be cared for in western countries has died. None, all recovered. Those American healthcare workers that The Toupee and Fox wanted kept out of the US because they were going to spread the disease and kill us all? All have been cured and no one else was infected.

Fox/Newscorp/Rush/Clear Channel are all lying to you. They are spreading fear because it makes them money. Quit being so damn gullible.  

Expert climatologist and epidemiologist all in one!  I may just start calling you “The Professor”.  I’m sure by now you’ve heard Duncan’s condition has been downgraded to “critical” today.  I sure hope he ends up not breaking the chain of not dying while under the care of a western nation.  

I don’t have a fear of catching it, I simply don’t believe it’s anything to be taken lightly.  You make it sound as if it deserves the concern of a common cold.

That right wing rag NY Times is even in on this with the winger sources you mentioned (which I don’t watch or listen to):

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/05/us/ebola.html?_r=0

Quote
Meanwhile, health officials had narrowed the pool of people who were at a risk of exposure in Dallas — because they had contact with Mr. Duncan while he was infectious — to nine, all of whom were being closely monitored.

Initially, officials reached out to 114 people in the Dallas area who potentially had direct or indirect contact with Mr. Duncan after he arrived in the city on Sept. 20. They have reduced that number to about 50 — the nine at high risk because they had definite contact with Mr. Duncan and about 40 others considered at lower risk.

“We don’t know that they had contact, but because we’re not certain that they did not have contact, we will be monitoring them as well,” said Dr. Frieden. Some of those people included patients who had traveled in the ambulance that had carried Mr. Duncan to the hospital before it was taken out of service and cleaned.


I will say that CDC and local health authorities are taking it quite seriously and I’m impressed with their diligence in making sure they keep the threat of it spreading minimal.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: swake on October 04, 2014, 06:54:29 pm
Courtesy of Hoss and the CDC:


http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/symptoms/index.html

Symptoms of Ebola include

Fever (greater than 38.6°C or 101.5°F)
Severe headache
Muscle pain
Weakness
Diarrhea
Vomiting
Abdominal (stomach) pain
Unexplained hemorrhage (bleeding or bruising)
Symptoms may appear anywhere from 2 to 21 days after exposure to Ebola, but the average is 8 to 10 days.



Yes, that is true in previous outbreaks, this one is coming on faster but also isn't as deadly only killing about 60% of victims down from 90%.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: swake on October 04, 2014, 06:57:40 pm
Expert climatologist and epidemiologist all in one!  I may just start calling you “The Professor”.  I’m sure by now you’ve heard Duncan’s condition has been downgraded to “critical” today.  I sure hope he ends up not breaking the chain of not dying while under the care of a western nation.  

I don’t have a fear of catching it, I simply don’t believe it’s anything to be taken lightly.  You make it sound as if it deserves the concern of a common cold.

That right wing rag NY Times is even in on this with the winger sources you mentioned (which I don’t watch or listen to):

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/05/us/ebola.html?_r=0

I will say that CDC and local health authorities are taking it quite seriously and I’m impressed with their diligence in making sure they keep the threat of it spreading minimal.

Yes, there was a serious failure in his case when he was sent home the first time he went to the hospital.  I also have said that I expect some of his family to become ill with his serious vomiting problem. I don't know if he can be saved, I am much more confident that if his family becomes ill they will have a good outcome.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Red Arrow on October 04, 2014, 08:37:42 pm
Yes, that is true in previous outbreaks, this one is coming on faster but also isn't as deadly only killing about 60% of victims down from 90%.

Source please.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: swake on October 04, 2014, 09:09:23 pm
Source please.

Yeah, I should have linked it when I first quoted it. I can't seem to find it anymore.

It was an article that listed each outbreak, infection rates, death rates, and incubation periods. I will keep looking. The survival rate is likely due to improved treatment, but the virus also may be changing.

I will keep looking.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Red Arrow on October 04, 2014, 09:19:19 pm
I can't seem to find it anymore.

I've been there before.



Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Ed W on October 04, 2014, 09:46:35 pm
Yeah, I should have linked it when I first quoted it. I can't seem to find it anymore.

It was an article that listed each outbreak, infection rates, death rates, and incubation periods. I will keep looking. The survival rate is likely due to improved treatment, but the virus also may be changing.

I will keep looking.

There's a wealth of information on this WHO site, including a chart of previous outbreaks and their mortality rates:

http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs103/en/ (http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs103/en/)

This was interesting:

"The virus family Filoviridae includes 3 genera: Cuevavirus, Marburgvirus, and Ebolavirus. There are 5 species that have been identified: Zaire, Bundibugyo, Sudan, Reston and Taï Forest. The first 3, Bundibugyo ebolavirus, Zaire ebolavirus, and Sudan ebolavirus have been associated with large outbreaks in Africa. The virus causing the 2014 west African outbreak belongs to the Zaire species."


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Townsend on October 04, 2014, 11:20:57 pm
So...is that a no on Benny Hinn?  Is Jethro Dollar a healer?

Which one of these mother scratchers can get in there and heal this smile?


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: dbacksfan 2.0 on October 04, 2014, 11:43:17 pm
So...is that a no on Benny Hinn?  Is Jethro Dollar a healer?

Which one of these mother scratchers can get in there and heal this smile?

This guy maybe? Is he still in the metroplex area?

(http://i.ytimg.com/vi/1Akxr5E4e1M/hqdefault.jpg)



Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Hoss on October 05, 2014, 12:02:04 am
This guy maybe? Is he still in the metroplex area?

(http://i.ytimg.com/vi/1Akxr5E4e1M/hqdefault.jpg)



Too much flatulence.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1hqfC0l5Pg[/youtube]


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: dbacksfan 2.0 on October 05, 2014, 12:51:14 am
Too much flatulence.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1hqfC0l5Pg[/youtube]

Thought about that clip, but did not want anyone to claim I owed them a keyboard/tablet/monitor for shooting a beverage out their nose.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Conan71 on October 05, 2014, 02:48:02 pm
Too much flatulence.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1hqfC0l5Pg[/youtube]

Best parody ever!


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: patric on October 05, 2014, 03:27:46 pm
The false ending from "Rise of the Planet of the Apes"

http://vimeo.com/58434926

Its not 1918 anymore, lets hope life doesnt imitate art.



Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Conan71 on October 08, 2014, 09:40:32 am
Thomas Duncan has died.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/102070648


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: guido911 on October 08, 2014, 11:15:27 am
There goes the criminal charges that needed to be talked about.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: dbacksfan 2.0 on October 08, 2014, 11:27:55 am
There goes the criminal charges that needed to be talked about.

Criminal charges?


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Hoss on October 08, 2014, 02:07:08 pm
Criminal charges?

The DA was talking about bringing criminal charges against this guy if he survived for 'knowingly brining a harmful disease into the country'..actually I'm paraphrasing it...but welcome to North Texas.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: dbacksfan 2.0 on October 08, 2014, 02:27:30 pm
The DA was talking about bringing criminal charges against this guy if he survived for 'knowingly brining a harmful disease into the country'..actually I'm paraphrasing it...but welcome to North Texas.

I had forgotten hearing about that, thanks. Sure they won't go after the surviving members of the familynhe was staying with, especially after the $100+k it cost to clean the apartment?


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: heironymouspasparagus on October 08, 2014, 02:44:59 pm
I had forgotten hearing about that, thanks. Sure they won't go after the surviving members of the familynhe was staying with, especially after the $100+k it cost to clean the apartment?


This was a very carefully laid out and executed plan to get him here on short notice.  The most likely helped a lot, so should share the cost.

And I bet he had no insurance, so that bill is likely to be just hanging there....



Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: guido911 on October 08, 2014, 04:30:10 pm
Criminal charges?

Just some stupidity that people had to discuss in order to make it look like Ebola reached America by some sort of criminality.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: DolfanBob on October 08, 2014, 04:40:28 pm
I thought the prosecution was going to be done in the Country he left. Supposedly because he lied about his health in order to get on a plane.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Hoss on October 08, 2014, 06:32:38 pm
I thought the prosecution was going to be done in the Country he left. Supposedly because he lied about his health in order to get on a plane.

It wasn't a given it was going to be done here, but I saw an interview of the DA in Texas earlier this afternoon who appeared, to me anyway, to be considering it.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: heironymouspasparagus on October 08, 2014, 08:18:43 pm
Just some stupidity that people had to discuss in order to make it look like Ebola reached America by some sort of criminality.


Uh....he did.  He lied on the forms Liberia requires - a criminal offense there.  Kinda like....by definition.


This was actually a very well executed, intentional plan to get here since he knew he was seriously exposed.  He no doubt had heard how the two brought to Atlanta were cured.  And he had a landing place here - family in Dallas.  He did what ANY rational person with the means to make it happen would do.  Came here to take his best shot at getting better care.  Nobody would do any different, regardless of whether criminal act or not.



Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: DolfanBob on October 09, 2014, 07:18:15 am
Well now just one day later. Jesse Jackson is in town stirring the pot. He appeared at the side of Mr Duncan's fiance and is calling for a full review of his treatment. Because the other five (white) patients treated here have either been cured. Or are being treated better than Mr Duncan.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Conan71 on October 09, 2014, 07:45:21 am
Well now just one day later. Jesse Jackson is in town stirring the pot. He appeared at the side of Mr Duncan's fiance and is calling for a full review of his treatment. Because the other five (white) patients treated here have either been cured. Or are being treated better than Mr Duncan.

The world will be such a better place once that a$$hole is gone.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Gaspar on October 09, 2014, 02:25:01 pm
Ebola is racist!


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Conan71 on October 10, 2014, 10:32:48 am
And the family is looking at suing the hospital because he received “unfair” treatment.  SRSLY?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2785923/No-one-died-Ebola-U-S-Outraged-family-eyes-lawsuit-America-s-patient-zero-succumbs-initially-turned-away-doctors-later-refused-blood-transfusion.html



Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: heironymouspasparagus on October 10, 2014, 10:44:54 am
And the family is looking at suing the hospital because he received “unfair” treatment.  SRSLY?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2785923/No-one-died-Ebola-U-S-Outraged-family-eyes-lawsuit-America-s-patient-zero-succumbs-initially-turned-away-doctors-later-refused-blood-transfusion.html




They should be looking at criminal charges for harboring/aiding/abetting a criminal!

This guy intentionally chose a path that could reasonably be shown to be attempted murder depending on illness spread.  He made a conscious effort to chance exposing many people - not just his family.  It is pure blind luck that no one has come up with it yet in his family.  It has been 20 days, so tomorrow should be the 'safe' time if the CDC is right.  And if none of the people around him has started to show symptoms yet - that probably won't be widely advertised if it happens...may take several days to come out.







Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: patric on October 10, 2014, 12:21:42 pm
A spokesperson for Deaconess Hospital in Oklahoma City says they've finished evaluating a patient that had been isolated for exhibiting possible Ebola symptoms, and determined the patient does not have Ebola.

http://www.okcfox.com/story/26754650/patient-at-deaconess-hospital-being-evaluated-for-possible-ebola-symptoms


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Conan71 on October 14, 2014, 09:04:00 am
I guess the WHO needs to quit listening to fright wing radio, they now claim we could see up to 10,000 new cases per week and the death rate is now 70%.  Margaret Chan, the director of WHO calls it the modern era’s greatest health emergency.

Quote
WHO: 10,000 new Ebola cases per week could be seen

GENEVA (AP) — The death rate in the Ebola outbreak has risen to 70 percent and there could be up to 10,000 new cases a week in two months, the World Health Organization warned Tuesday.

WHO assistant director-general Dr. Bruce Aylward gave the grim figures during a news conference in Geneva. Previously, WHO had estimated the death rate at around 50 percent.

Aylward said the 70 percent death rate was "a high mortality disease" in any circumstance and that the U.N. health agency was still focused on trying to get sick people isolated and provide treatment as early as possible.

He told reporters that if the world's response to the Ebola crisis isn't stepped up within 60 days, "a lot more people will die" and there will be a huge need to deal with the spiraling numbers of cases.

For the last four weeks, there's been about 1,000 new cases per week — including suspected, confirmed and probable cases, he said, adding that the U.N. health agency is aiming to get 70 percent of cases isolated within two months to reverse the outbreak.

WHO increased its Ebola death toll tally to 4,447 people on Tuesday, nearly all of them in West Africa, from 8,914 cases.

Sierra Leone, Guinea and Liberia have been hardest hit nations in the current outbreak. Aylward said WHO was very concerned about the continued spread of Ebola in the three countries' capital cities —Freetown, Conakry and Monrovia.

He said the agency was still focused on trying to treat Ebola patients, despite the huge demands on the broken health systems in West Africa.

"It would be horrifically unethical to say that we're just going to isolate people," he said, noting that new strategies like handing out protective equipment to families and setting up very basic clinics — without much treatment — was a priority.

In Berlin, a U.N. medical worker infected with Ebola in Liberia died despite "intensive medical procedures." The St. Georg hospital in Leipzig said Tuesday that the 56-year-old man, whose name has not been released, died overnight of the infection.

The man tested positive for Ebola on Oct. 6, prompting Liberia's U.N. peacekeeping mission to place 41 other staff members under "close medical observation."

He arrived in Leipzig for treatment on Oct. 9. The hospital's chief executive, Dr. Iris Minde, said at the time there was no risk of infection for other people, since he was kept in a secure isolation ward specially equipped with negative pressure rooms that are hermetically sealed.

He was the third Ebola patient to be flown to Germany for treatment. The first man recovered and returned home to Senegal. A Uganda aid worker is still being treated in Frankfurt.

http://news.yahoo.com/10-000-ebola-cases-per-week-could-seen-124410379.html



Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Townsend on October 14, 2014, 09:10:24 am
I guess the WHO needs to quit listening to fright wing radio,


Why's that?


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Conan71 on October 14, 2014, 09:11:59 am
Why's that?

Swake mentioned a few pages back that all this hysteria is the fault of Rush, Fox, and Clear Channel.  So I assume Ms. Chan must be an ardent consumer of their news.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Townsend on October 14, 2014, 09:17:42 am
Swake mentioned a few pages back that all this hysteria is the fault of Rush, Fox, and Clear Channel.  So I assume Ms. Chan must be an ardent consumer of their news.

How many new cases in the US?  Don't think Rush, FOX and Clear channel care about West Africa.  West Africa doesn't sell commercial time.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Gaspar on October 14, 2014, 01:59:04 pm
I guess the WHO needs to quit listening to fright wing radio, they now claim we could see up to 10,000 new cases per week and the death rate is now 70%.  Margaret Chan, the director of WHO calls it the modern era’s greatest health emergency.

Ebola was/is not a massive concern for a modern, clean, low-density society with good healthcare.  Of course that was the message. . .

The first step in an epidemiological scenario like this (both from a micro and macro perspective) is to quarantine individuals, and cut off travel to and from the hot-zone(s).  Unfortunately like every other policy decision made by this administration, it will be made only after significant pressure from the public, and it will be made too late. We will likely see several more cases, before restrictions are instituted.

That, however does not stop Ebola as a funding issue. . .as with all offerings of imminent disaster, this virus has political value to the left    ;)

The left will follow their established pattern: 
1. Find out what the populous is scared of
2. If they have no fears, create ____
3. Promote the idea that you have the only solution to ____
4. Provide a narrative where the opposition wants them to die from ____
5. Rinse and repeat.

Ebola just offers a new side-car to the current vehicles.



Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: BKDotCom on October 14, 2014, 02:14:34 pm

The left Washington will follow their established pattern: 
1. Find out what the populous is scared of
2. If they have no fears, create ____
3. Promote the idea that you have the only solution to ____
4. Provide a narrative where the opposition wants them to die from ____
5. Rinse and repeat.

Ebola just offers a new side-car to the current vehicles.

Fixed that for you


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Gaspar on October 14, 2014, 02:24:19 pm
Fixed that for you

BREAKING:
They just discovered images of a top secret $500 million NIH Ebola research lab in California.
(http://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bz03e4cCMAAFgO7.jpg:large)


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: heironymouspasparagus on October 14, 2014, 05:50:35 pm
This has become a Geico commercial, and the United States is acting like the group of kids who pass on the waiting car - that is running - and choose to hide behind the chainsaws!!


Stop people from coming here on airplanes from ebola affected countries - by whatever path they take.  It's not rocket science....



Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Conan71 on October 14, 2014, 07:02:13 pm
This has become a Geico commercial, and the United States is acting like the group of kids who pass on the waiting car - that is running - and choose to hide behind the chainsaws!!


Stop people from coming here on airplanes from ebola affected countries - by whatever path they take.  It's not rocket science....



Can’t do that Heir, that’s racist, uncaring, and just plain fear-mongering.  You been listening to Rush, Hannity, O’Reilly...did you get Murdoched?


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: heironymouspasparagus on October 14, 2014, 07:36:39 pm
Can’t do that Heir, that’s racist, uncaring, and just plain fear-mongering.  You been listening to Rush, Hannity, O’Reilly...did you get Murdoched?



I listen to them every chance I get - until I can't any more.  Usually quite a bit.  But no...I haven't been Murdoched... still have a brain - high functioning - and the ability to reason!

See Bernie LaPlante explanation of Life, the Universe, and Everything..... (third quote)...

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0104412/quotes

Or;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eSijB9-Hw7g





Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Conan71 on October 15, 2014, 07:36:05 am
And now a second health care worker has contracted Ebola in Dallas.  According to the nurse’s union, Dallas Presbyterian lacked protocols to deal with Thomas Duncan’s case.  Overall, more than 70 health care workers had contact with Duncan.  They also had contact with other patients, their own family members, etc.  Transmission of this disease seems to be much easier than other diseases which are borne in bodily fluids such as HIV.  But hey, no worries, our government will protect us from everything!

Quote
A national nurses union is decrying an absence of protocols at the Dallas hospital where a man died of Ebola and a nurse was infected while caring for him.

Leaders of the National Nurses Union read a statement Tuesday which they said represented concerns from a number of nurses that work at Texas Health Presbyterian in Dallas. The union officials declined to identify the Dallas nurses or say how many were participating in the statement.

But they were vociferous in citing a lack of protocols on the day that Thomas Eric Duncan was admitted with extreme symptoms of Ebola.

Among the flaws cited by the group included:

insufficient garb worn by the emergency personnel
the fact that Duncan was left "for hours" in a non-quarantined zone
that his lab samples were sent in the same way that normal specimens are sent
hospital official allowed nurses involved with Duncan to take care of other patients
other ways in which the hospital did not immediately react to the situation.
 
African Ebola outbreak could result in 5-10,000 new cases weekly

"Were protocols breached?" said union spokeswoman Rose Ann DeMoro, "There were no protocols."

"These nurses are not well protected. They're not prepared to handle Ebola or any other pandemic," said DeMoro. "We are deeply alarmed."

DeMoro said the nurses who had come forward were afraid to reveal their identities "because of a culture of threat in the hospitals."

Tuesday night, Texas Health Presbyterian issued a statement in response to the nurses' charges.

"Patient and employee safety is our greatest priority and we take compliance very seriously. We have numerous measures in place to provide a safe working environment, including mandatory annual training and a 24-7 hotline and other mechanisms that allow for anonymous reporting. Our nursing staff is committed to providing quality, compassionate care, as we have always known, and as the world has seen firsthand in recent days. We will continue to review and respond to any concerns raised by our nurses and all employees."

Also Tuesday, the nation's top disease-fighting agency acknowledged Tuesday that federal health experts failed to do all they should have done to prevent Ebola from spreading from a Liberian man who died last week in Texas to the nurse who treated him.

 
CDC ramps up Ebola training for health care workers

Agency Director Tom Frieden outlined a series of steps designed to stop the spread of the disease in the U.S., including increased training for health care workers and changes at the Texas hospital where the virus was diagnosed to minimize the risk of more infections.

A total of 76 people at the hospital might have had exposure to Thomas Eric Duncan, and all of them are being monitored for fever and other symptoms daily, Frieden said.

That figure confirmed an Associated Press report on Monday that nurse Nina Pham was among about 70 hospital staffers who were involved in Duncan's care after he was hospitalized, based on medical records provided by Duncan's family.

 Ebola protocols reevaluated following nurse's infection

The announcement of the government's stepped-up effort came after top health officials repeatedly assured the public over the last two weeks that they were doing everything possible to control the outbreak by deploying infectious-disease specialists to the hospital where Duncan was diagnosed with Ebola and later died.

"I wish we had put a team like this on the ground the day the patient - the first patient - was diagnosed. That might have prevented this infection. But we will do that from today onward with any case anywhere in the U.S.," Frieden said.

Frieden described the new response team as having some of the world's leading experts in how to care for Ebola and protect health care workers. They planned to review everything from how the isolation room is physically laid out, to what protective equipment health workers use, to waste management and decontamination.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/nurses-union-dallas-hospital-lacked-ebola-protocols/

Frieden’s “Great job Brownie” moment is coming.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Gaspar on October 15, 2014, 09:16:46 am
The media is going to make this the nurse's fault before this is all over.
http://news.yahoo.com/texas-nurse-contracted-ebola-understood-risks-153314500.html?soc_src=mediacontentstory
Nurse infected with Ebola knew risks of her work

Dosen't really change the fact that the patient she cared for should have never been here in the first place.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Hoss on October 15, 2014, 09:27:24 am
You know, I find it a bit ironic that the entire country freaks out when 1 person that has Ebola dies in this country.

However, 10,000 annual deaths by firearms?  Meh, who cares.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Conan71 on October 15, 2014, 09:29:35 am
The media is going to make this the nurse's fault before this is all over.
http://news.yahoo.com/texas-nurse-contracted-ebola-understood-risks-153314500.html?soc_src=mediacontentstory
Nurse infected with Ebola knew risks of her work

Dosen't really change the fact that the patient she cared for should have never been here in the first place.

This morning, Nurse Pham was reported to be in good condition.  No doubt this is because she’s a white Asian and received superior care to the late Mr. Duncan.  ::)


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Gaspar on October 15, 2014, 09:32:20 am
You know, I find it a bit ironic that the entire country freaks out when 1 person that has Ebola dies in this country.

However, 10,000 annual deaths by firearms?  Meh, who cares.

The purchase of a firearm does not translate into a 70% fatality rate.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Gaspar on October 15, 2014, 09:33:24 am
This morning, Nurse Pham was reported to be in good condition.  No doubt this is because she’s a white Asian and received superior care to the late Mr. Duncan.  ::)

QUICK! To the Sharptonmobile!
(http://thenypost.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/17-2n011-sharpton1-ta-300x300.jpg)


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Hoss on October 15, 2014, 09:35:59 am
The purchase of a firearm does not translate into a 70% fatality rate.

Thanks for proving my point.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Conan71 on October 15, 2014, 09:37:23 am
You know, I find it a bit ironic that the entire country freaks out when 1 person that has Ebola dies in this country.

However, 10,000 annual deaths by firearms?  Meh, who cares.

32,000 technically with roughly 1/2 homicide, but who’s counting?

The reason I believe people are worried is repeated assurances this was being contained and controlled in Africa.  Then a case shows up here in the states and now two healthcare workers who supposedly were properly trained and equipped to deal with this and other infectious diseases turn up with it.  This amidst assurances from the CDC how this would a) never reach our shores; b) if it did we can cure it; c) it won’t spread.

Either there’s more to the disease than anyone is aware or is being informed of, or we are simply not being told the whole truth.  There’s no disputing this is the largest ebola outbreak ever, that’s been repeated multiple times by WHO.  With each emerging case in west Africa, there’s more of a chance of it spreading through Europe, Asia, or North and South America if strict travel restrictions are not put in place.

Particularly repugnant is the idiots in Washington, as usual, are making this a political issue when it needs to be a common sense one.  But politics and commonsense don’t belong in the same sentence.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Hoss on October 15, 2014, 09:38:51 am
32,000 technically with roughly 1/2 homicide, but who’s counting?

The reason I believe people are worried is repeated assurances this was being contained and controlled in Africa.  Then a case shows up here in the states and now two healthcare workers who supposedly were properly trained and equipped to deal with this and other infectious diseases turn up with it.  This amidst assurances from the CDC how this would a) never reach our shores; b) if it did we can cure it; c) it won’t spread.

Either there’s more to the disease than anyone is aware or is being informed of, or we are simply not being told the whole truth.  There’s no disputing this is the largest ebola outbreak ever, that’s been repeated multiple times by WHO.  With each emerging case in west Africa, there’s more of a chance of it spreading through Europe, Asia, or North and South America if strict travel restrictions are not put in place.

Particularly repugnant is the idiots in Washington, as usual, are making this a political issue when it needs to be a common sense one.  But politics and commonsense don’t belong in the same sentence.

Thanks for the thoughtful response.  I can usually expect that from you C... :)


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: heironymouspasparagus on October 15, 2014, 09:55:32 am
You know, I find it a bit ironic that the entire country freaks out when 1 person that has Ebola dies in this country.

However, 10,000 annual deaths by firearms?  Meh, who cares.


37,000 by flu.
500,000 by heart disease - preventable.
400,000 by smoking - preventable.
15,000 by drunk drivers - absolutely preventable.



Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Gaspar on October 15, 2014, 11:26:54 am
Credit due!

Obama has just announced he will cancel his additional fundraising trips this week to attend national security briefings and address the Ebola issue.

Sad that it took public outcry, but he deserves credit for making the decision to do this President thing.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_OBAMA_EBOLA?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT



Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Townsend on October 15, 2014, 11:43:34 am
Credit due!

Obama has just announced he will cancel his additional fundraising trips this week to attend national security briefings and address the Ebola issue.

Sad that it took public outcry, but he deserves credit for making the decision to do this President thing.


I've sent him your thoughts.  He'll be so excited you approve.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: guido911 on October 15, 2014, 12:32:37 pm
It's hard presidenting...

https://twitter.com/vplus/status/522419923004719105


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: guido911 on October 15, 2014, 12:36:07 pm
I've sent him your thoughts.  He'll be so excited you approve.

Man could we have all sorts of fun with that post.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Townsend on October 15, 2014, 12:42:16 pm
Man could we have all sorts of fun with that post.

Gosh Guido, I'm so glad.

Be sure to wipe up once you're done.  Wouldn't want to get anyone infected with whatever you might have.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Conan71 on October 15, 2014, 12:45:53 pm
If you were on Frontier flight 1143 from Cleveland to Dallas on Monday, CDC wants to talk to you.  Thomas Frieden says she should not have been flying in the first place.  Makes a travel ban sound even more sensible, eh?  If we don’t want anyone potentially exposed to it in this country flying or on public transportation for 21 days, why would we allow people who may have been exposed in west Africa to travel here?

Quote
Federal health officials said Wednesday that a second Dallas health-care worker who tested positive for Ebola violated health rules by by flying with 132 people who flew with her on a Frontier Airlines jet from Cleveland to Dallas.

All of those passengers and crew on that flight were asked to immediately contact the U.S. Centers for Disease Control for possible monitoring, as officials also announced that the new patient will be transported Wednesday to a hospital in Atlanta for treatment. She was identified by the public health director of Cleveland as Amber Joy Vinson.

CDC Director Dr. Thomas Frieden said the newly infected patient "should not have traveled on a commercial flight" or taken any other public transportation because she had had contact with an Ebola patient at her hospital, and because her temperature was a slightly elevated 99.5 degrees before she boarded Monday's flight from Cleveland.

Vinson only became feverish on Tuesday. Vinson is the second health-care worker at Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital in Dallas to be diagnosed with Ebola after having cared for Liberian national Thomas Eric Duncan, who died from the disease Oct. 8. The other current patient there was nurse for Duncan, 26-year-old Nina Pham, who is stable condition.

Frieden said that the risk of the woman having infected another person on the flight Monday is "extremely low" because of the difficulty in transmitting Ebola.

Vinson "will be transported" to Emory University hospital in Atlanta from Dallas later Wednesday "as a result of a clinical decision," said US Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Matthews Burwell. Vinson was not named by Burwell, Frieden or health officials in Texas when they discussed her case.

Emory has recently cared for two prior Ebola patients, both Americans who recovered from the virus, and is sending two nurses to Texas Health Presbyterian to assist in treating Pham.

Officials are also going to monitor three people Vinson had contact with before she was isolated Tuesday.

Kent State University in Ohio said Vinson has three relatives who work at the university, but also said she did not visit the campus during her recent trip to her family's home in Summit County, Ohio.

Kent State's director of health services, Dr. Angela DeJulius, said "Out of an abundance of caution, we're asking the patient's family members to remain off campus for the next 21 days and self-monitor per CDC protocol."

Neither the three people who had contact with Vinson, nor more than 120 others who had contact with Duncan will be allowed to travel on commercial flights or public transportation until they clear the incubation deadline for the virus, Frieden said.

In response to dramatic developments, President Barack Obama canceled a planned election-season trip Wednesday to New Jersey and Connecticut.

Instead, administration officials said, he will convene an afternoon meeting at the White House with agencies coordinating the government's response to the outbreak.

Officials also warned that additional cases of the deadly virus at the Dallas hospital where the woman worked are "a very real possibility."

"We have contingencies for more," Dallas County Judge Clay Jenkins said during a morning briefing on Vinson's diagnosis.

Jenkins said Vinson was isolated within 90 minutes of reporting a fever Tuesday. She is the third person diagnosed in the U.S. with Ebola, which is currently epidemic in three West African countries.

The CDC hours later revealed that Vinson had flown on Monday on Frontier Airlines Flight 1143 from Cleveland to Dallas/Fort Worth. The CDC asked all passengers aboard that flight to call 1-800-232-4636. Frontier Airlines said passengers who also traveled with the woman on Flight 1142 on Friday from Dallas/Fort Worth to Cleveland should contact CDC as well.

"Individuals who are determined to be at any potential risk will be actively monitored," the CDC said in a statement. It said the woman exhibited no symptoms aboard the flight on Monday evening. The disease can be spread only by contact with bodily fluids and when symptoms appear, and not by casual contact, the CDC has said.

Frontier Airlines said the aircraft used for Flight 1143 remained grounded overnight from Monday and received a thorough cleaning, as is normal. The aircraft was cleaned again in Cleveland on Tuesday night, the airline said.
Vinson and Pham's employer, Texas Health Presbyterian, is facing renewed criticism for its handling of Duncan's case.

Texas Health didn't initially admit the Liberian national Duncan for treatment Sept. 25 despite knowing he had a high fever and had recently traveled from West Africa, center of the largest Ebola outbreak on record. Duncan was admitted three days later after becoming more seriously ill.

Vinson and Pham were among 77 people who were involved in treating Duncan or handling his blood. All were placed on a monitoring list, but only after Pham had been diagnosed with Ebola. They join 48 people who had or may have had contact with Duncan before he was admitted to the hospital.

"Health officials have interviewed the latest patient to quickly identify any contacts or potential exposures, and those people will be monitored," the Texas Department of Health said in a statement. "The type of monitoring depends on the nature of their interactions and the potential they were exposed to the virus."

As with Pham's case, it is not known precisely how Vinson became infected while caring for Duncan. But Frieden said both women "had extensive contact" with Duncan in the initial days of his stay at Texas Health, a time when he was suffering from intense vomiting and diarrhea.

During that same time, Frieden said, "a variety of forms of personal protective equipment were used." Frieden suggested that the

Jenkins called the new case "a gut shot" to the staff at Texas Heath, "because this is one of their own."

He said more cases there are "a very real possibility."

Jenkins called Vinson, without using her name, "a heroic person, a person who is dedicating her life to serving others."

"And we hope and pray that, like Nina, she will get on a good track."

CDC reviewing treatment protocols

Early Wednesday, officials made reverse 911 calls to neighbors of Vinson's in Dallas. The common areas outside her apartment were cleaned, and the inside of her unit was set to be cleaned later in the day.

Vinson lives alone, with no pets, officials said.

The latest case came to light just hours after CDC Director Frieden said he regretted not having immediately sent a more "robust" CDC team Texas Health after Duncan was admitted with Ebola in late September.

Frieden said such a step "might have prevented" Pham's infection.

Her diagnosis led the CDC to "rethink" the way it tries to control Ebola from spreading to caregivers, said Frieden, who since has dispatched a specialized infection-control team to Texas to complement an existing CDC squad.

Officials are reviewing and revising the protocols for treatment of the two women at the hospital.

Among other things, Frieden has suggested that health-care workers may have been using too many layers of protective garb, which can present an opportunity for a mistake when they are removed after interacting with a patient, as can the use of tape to hold down openings for hands in that gear. He also said officials have recommended that fewer caregivers go in and out of the rooms containing an Ebola patient.

Texas Health Presbyterian was criticized hours before Vinson's case came to light by a nurses union, National Nurses United, which accused the hospital of not having proper protocols in place to handle the disease.

The union said nurses at the hospital complained of confusion and little training in the days after Duncan was diagnosed, putting tem at risk.

"There was no advance preparedness on what to do with the patient, there was no protocol, there was no system," the group said in a statement.

The hospital responded by saying: "Patient and employee safety is our greatest priority and we take compliance very seriously. We have numerous measures in place to provide a safe working environment, including mandatory annual training and a 24-7 hotline and other mechanisms that allow for anonymous reporting."

During a briefing Wednesday morning, Daniel Varga, chief clinical officer for Texas Health, said, "I don't think we have a systematic, institutional problem."
l
He said said Texas Health is looking into every element of the protective equipment staff uses to treat Ebola patient, as well as other infection-control measures at the hospital.

Texas Gov. Rick Perry said "The diagnosis of a second health care worker in Dallas reaffirms what a formidable foe this virus is."

"I am in daily contact with Dr. Brett Giroir and Dr. David Lakey and earlier today spoke with White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough and HHS Secretary Sylvia Mathews Burwell to ensure state and federal management of this issue is tightly coordinated."

"This is the first time that our nation has had to deal with a threat such as this. Everyone working on this challenge—from the medical professionals at the bedside to the public health officials addressing containment of the infection—is working to end the threat posed by this disease. These individuals are keeping the health and safety of Texans and the needs of the patients as their most critical tasks. Every relevant agency at the local, state and national levels is working to support these individuals."

Perry also said, "I have great faith that we will succeed in this important mission; once we have put it behind us we will be the stronger for it and more prepared to meet the kinds of challenges that we as Americans are uniquely prepared to face."

People with Ebola are not contagious until symptoms such as fever develop. The disease is spread through direct contact with bodily fluids or exposure to contaminated objects such as needles.

Pham, in a statement issued Tuesday, said she was "doing well," and thanked "everyone for their kind wishes and prayers."

Ebola has an incubation period of up to 21 days. The 48 people who are being monitored for having contact with Duncan before his admission to the hospital are due to come off monitoring on Sunday, and so far none has shown any symptoms.

While several Americans who contracted Ebola in West Africa have been treated for the virus after being transported in the U.S.—including NBC News freelance cameraman Ashoka Mukpo—there have been no other cases diagnosed in the U.S. besides the three in Dallas.

A new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll conducted before the third case emerged found that 56 percent of Americans say the United States is ready for a possible outbreak, but only about one in 10 say the country is "very prepared."

In its situation report Friday, the World Health Organization said global deaths from Ebola had reached over 4,000, with the most "widespread and intense transmission" occurring in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone. Officials expect there to be 9,000 officially diagnosed cases of the virus by the end of this week.

Countries with "initial cases" or "localized transmission" included Nigeria, Senegal, Spain and the U.S.

WHO officials on Tuesday said there could be up to 10,000 new cases of Ebola diagnosed in West Africa by December in the absence of ramped-up efforts to combat the disease.

CORRECTION: An earlier version had the wrong number for the CDC. The correct number is 1-800-232-4636


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: guido911 on October 15, 2014, 01:10:38 pm
Gosh Guido, I'm so glad.

Be sure to wipe up once you're done.  Wouldn't want to get anyone infected with whatever you might have.
Funny. That's precisely where I was going with you and your proximity to Obama. You have officially stopped trying.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Gaspar on October 15, 2014, 01:30:01 pm
If you were on Frontier flight 1143 from Cleveland to Dallas on Monday, CDC wants to talk to you.  Thomas Frieden says she should not have been flying in the first place.  Makes a travel ban sound even more sensible, eh?  If we don’t want anyone potentially exposed to it in this country flying or on public transportation for 21 days, why would we allow people who may have been exposed in west Africa to travel here?


There will ultimately be a travel ban, but not until after several more cases erupt. It will unfold exactly like all of the other administration responses to everything from the economy to national security.

The president cannot institute a travel ban right now, because to do so would mean that everyone who said he should do it weeks ago was right. It would mean a huge political disaster.  Imagine, Donald Trump, one of the first people to demand a travel ban, grandstanding about how he was right and FINALLY the Obama listened. The horror!

Even a significant increase in the threat will not politically justify implementing a ban.  Most likely what is taking place in back-channels is the White House attempting to get additional members of the EU and perhaps a resolution from the UN banning travel to and from Liberia with the exception of medical aid missions. . .If successful, the president will be able to follow the "international community" instead of being seen as feckless on the issue.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Townsend on October 15, 2014, 01:38:06 pm
Funny. That's precisely where I was going with you and your proximity to Obama.

Sure it was


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Gaspar on October 15, 2014, 01:56:02 pm
Exactly as predicted.  Ebola was caused by the Republicans.

SHEILA JACKSON LEE: I’m frustrated we didn’t take the initial encounter in Dallas at the level that it should have been. The county officials have been excellent, but the fractured infrastructure, and understanding what was happening to Mr. Duncan did not translate to those front liners, the nurses and techs and others. That is unfair to them. I’m frustrated with that. I will also say that Center For Disease Control suffers from the continued gridlock in Washington and Republicans not funding fully even though the fight against Ebola is bipartisan, the CDC and NIH has suffered in its funding.
https://grabien.com/file.php?id=27109&searchorder=date


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Townsend on October 15, 2014, 02:17:52 pm
Exactly as predicted.  Ebola was caused by the Republicans.


That had already been established when we cut funding.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: heironymouspasparagus on October 15, 2014, 05:00:46 pm
Exactly as predicted.  Ebola was caused by the Republicans.

SHEILA JACKSON LEE: I’m frustrated we didn’t take the initial encounter in Dallas at the level that it should have been. The county officials have been excellent, but the fractured infrastructure, and understanding what was happening to Mr. Duncan did not translate to those front liners, the nurses and techs and others. That is unfair to them. I’m frustrated with that. I will also say that Center For Disease Control suffers from the continued gridlock in Washington and Republicans not funding fully even though the fight against Ebola is bipartisan, the CDC and NIH has suffered in its funding.
https://grabien.com/file.php?id=27109&searchorder=date


Even though you think you are being facetious, that is exactly one of the reasons we are having problems with things like this.  You cannot "cut" your way to profitability as a company, and you cannot "cut" your way to better government services - in exactly the same way!



Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: TheArtist on October 15, 2014, 05:41:06 pm
Saw a Facebook post today.    Ok, government says Ebola is hard to get, yet 2 trained nurses in full hazmat gear got it.  Mmmmkay. 

What caught my attention in one news story was how they were keeping an eye on one homeless person who had had contact with the patient in Dallas, but then they lost track of the homeless person. They did find him later.  But despite how great and modern our society is, you suddenly start to see how some things we don't pay much attention to, could be the weak link that could get things to turn ugly real quick.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: heironymouspasparagus on October 15, 2014, 08:19:29 pm
Interlude moment....

Say "Ebola" to yourself in exactly the same way the commercials say "Riccola...."   Fits perfectly.





Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: guido911 on October 16, 2014, 02:11:26 am
I have seen on twitter several sources claiming the CDC approved on Ebola exposed nurse to travel by air with symptoms. I guess that too was a result of funding cuts.


Title: Re:
Post by: Ed W on October 16, 2014, 04:32:41 am
What sources, Guido?

Ed W


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Townsend on October 16, 2014, 07:05:07 am
Yes Guido, what sources?


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: DolfanBob on October 16, 2014, 07:10:23 am
I have seen on twitter several sources claiming the CDC approved on Ebola exposed nurse to travel by air with symptoms. I guess that too was a result of funding cuts.

Here's one source.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2793691/second-healthcare-worker-tests-positive-ebola-texas.html


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Townsend on October 16, 2014, 07:16:32 am
Here's one source.


Probably shouldn't ask the receptionist at the CDC.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Hoss on October 16, 2014, 07:53:54 am
Probably shouldn't ask the receptionist at the CDC.

Nearly the same as asking the intern at the NTSB:

(http://thumbs.cdn-ec.viddler.com/thumbnail_2_f3c6b0a6_v1.jpg)


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Conan71 on October 16, 2014, 07:54:55 am
Nearly the same as asking the intern at the NTSB:

(http://thumbs.cdn-ec.viddler.com/thumbnail_2_f3c6b0a6_v1.jpg)

Still funny as ever!


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: patric on October 16, 2014, 09:24:35 am
Saw a Facebook post today.    Ok, government says Ebola is hard to get, yet 2 trained nurses in full hazmat gear got it.  Mmmmkay. 

What caught my attention in one news story was how they were keeping an eye on one homeless person who had had contact with the patient in Dallas, but then they lost track of the homeless person. They did find him later.  But despite how great and modern our society is, you suddenly start to see how some things we don't pay much attention to, could be the weak link that could get things to turn ugly real quick.

We past the point of having Dustin Hoffman lure him out of the woods with a plate of apples?


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Conan71 on October 16, 2014, 09:44:08 am
This doesn’t help matters, the internet and social media are great places to spread misinformation.  An article appeared yesterday claiming that CIDRAP had determined ebola could be transmitted via airborne particles.

Quote
University of Minnesota knocks down claim of new Ebola risks

Ebola anxiety spread rapidly on social media Wednesday when inaccurate articles and tweets claimed that University of Minnesota infectious disease experts had determined the deadly virus has become airborne — a claim quickly shot down by the U.

A Twitter user with the name @UnivMinnNews, which uses the U logo but is not an official university account, spread the claim — citing an article in the alternative news site Inquisitr. That story cited a commentary posted on the website of the U’s Center for Infectious Disease Control and Policy (CIDRAP).

The published commentary, however, doesn’t make that claim, U officials pointed out. It only states that “people should understand the potential for a virus to become airborne.” And while it was posted on the CIDRAP website, it was written by an unaffiliated researcher from Chicago.

“CIDRAP is not saying [Ebola] is airborne,” spokeswoman Caroline Marin said Wednesday afternoon. “There is always the possibility that diseases can mutate.”

The false claims spread rapidly on social media, and seemed to stoke fears already heightened by the discovery that a second nurse in Texas became infected at a hospital that treated the first U.S.-diagnosed case of Ebola.

Ebola spreads through contact with infected bodily fluids such as blood and saliva — unlike seasonal influenza, which can be airborne. The current Ebola outbreak is centered in west Africa, where more than 8,000 people have suffered infections and 4,000 have died. CIDRAP’s director, Michael Osterholm, said last week that he doubts there will be widespread transmission of Ebola in the U.S., or cases in Minnesota.

http://www.startribune.com/lifestyle/health/279361722.html


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: rebound on October 16, 2014, 10:32:03 am
This doesn’t help matters, the internet and social media are great places to spread misinformation.  An article appeared yesterday claiming that CIDRAP had determined ebola could be transmitted via airborne particles.

"The person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals, and you know it!"  - Agent K,  MIB


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: dbacksfan 2.0 on October 16, 2014, 06:29:08 pm
So who will be the Ebola Czar to work with Susan Rice,  DHS, NSA, NIH, CDC, FDA?


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Conan71 on October 16, 2014, 11:30:54 pm
So who will be the Ebola Czar to work with Susan Rice,  DHS, NSA, NIH, CDC, FDA?

He’s already used to being thrown under the bus then having the bus backed up and rolled forward over him.  Repeatedly.  CDC seems to be as competent as 2005 FEMA.  Again, why do so many people stake their hope and safety on government bureaucracies which understand little or nothing about humanity, nor reality?

(http://humor.beecy.net/politics/bushisms/brownie/bush-brownie.jpg)


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: dbacksfan 2.0 on October 17, 2014, 01:35:18 am
He’s already used to being thrown under the bus then having the bus backed up and rolled forward over him.  Repeatedly.  CDC seems to be as competent as 2005 FEMA.  Again, why do so many people stake their hope and safety on government bureaucracies which understand little or nothing about humanity, nor reality?

(http://humor.beecy.net/politics/bushisms/brownie/bush-brownie.jpg)

Seems like for all the posturing and posing and statements about how well we are prepared, truth is, no one seems to know what to do. Reminds me of the anthrax scare after 9/11, go out and buy visqueen and duct tape to cover the windows.

So we have been funding all of this with taxpayer dollars, and once again it doesn't seem to work. It's like a town with thousands of dollars for SWAT equipment, and no one has been trained how to use it.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: dbacksfan 2.0 on October 17, 2014, 10:41:27 am
The latest Czar...........

http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/17/politics/ebola-czar-ron-klain/index.html?hpt=hp_t1 (http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/17/politics/ebola-czar-ron-klain/index.html?hpt=hp_t1)


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: patric on October 17, 2014, 12:33:09 pm
The exposure score now is three passenger jets and a 5,075 person capacity cruise ship...

We really DO make stupid decisions

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWv-dIUP9oc[/youtube]


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: patric on October 18, 2014, 09:45:41 pm
A flight from Hartford, Conn. to DFW made an emergency landing in Tulsa for what the flight crew believed at the time to be a passenger with Ebola.

http://www.fox23.com/news/news/local/plane-makes-emergency-landing-tulsa-due-medical-em/nhmnn

Instead of the ambulance meeting the plane on the tarmac, they wheel the patient right thru the middle of Tulsa International.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: heironymouspasparagus on October 19, 2014, 09:13:24 pm
I'm starting to get a little paranoid...this virus is tracking me and following me!!  Was in Dallas - less than a mile from the hospital when Duncan was there - now there are about a dozen kids from Moore schools who were on the cruise ship and have been told to stay home.  And several from Newcastle who were on the ship but were told to come to school.  I will be in Moore area for the first part of the week!!  Hope the virus doesn't have it's GPS tracking on my phone!!



Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: heironymouspasparagus on October 19, 2014, 09:15:56 pm
The exposure score now is three passenger jets and a 5,075 person capacity cruise ship...

We really DO make stupid decisions

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWv-dIUP9oc[/youtube]


Exactly!   That's the commercial I was talking about a few days ago....



Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: guido911 on October 23, 2014, 07:21:06 pm
Ebola is now diagnosed in NYC.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/24/nyregion/craig-spencer-is-tested-for-ebola-virus-at-bellevue-hospital-in-new-york-city.html?_r=0


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Conan71 on October 23, 2014, 09:02:16 pm
Ebola is now diagnosed in NYC.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/24/nyregion/craig-spencer-is-tested-for-ebola-virus-at-bellevue-hospital-in-new-york-city.html?_r=0

What’s the over/under on how long Ebola lives on a bowling ball?


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Breadburner on October 24, 2014, 05:38:57 am
(http://img.ccrd.clearchannel.com/media/mlib/611/2014/10/default/eeeeebola_0_1412865425.jpg)


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: guido911 on October 24, 2014, 01:50:57 pm
(https://scontent-a-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpa1/v/t1.0-9/10447548_866873466706117_1040412505348977014_n.jpg?oh=6a47da15b2a689de031f9ed04f0f1465&oe=54E83F38)


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: guido911 on October 24, 2014, 11:37:36 pm
Nina Pham was discharged from the hospital after defeating Ebola, and credited prayer for her recovery. Well, we just can't have that...

http://twitchy.com/2014/10/24/atheists-slam-imbecilic-nina-pham-for-crediting-power-of-prayer-for-recovery/?utm_source=autotweet&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=twitter


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: guido911 on October 25, 2014, 02:56:43 pm
Mandatory quarantines in two states.

http://time.com/3537755/ebola-new-york-new-jersey/


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: guido911 on October 28, 2014, 08:37:19 pm
Apparently quarantining persons that volunteer health care workers overseas to help Ebola is bad, but quarantining volunteer soldiers that go to the same area is good. Can someone explain to me the difference?


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Red Arrow on October 28, 2014, 10:53:04 pm
Apparently quarantining persons that volunteer health care workers overseas to help Ebola is bad, but quarantining volunteer soldiers that go to the same area is good. Can someone explain to me the difference?

UCMJ vs Constitution.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: guido911 on October 29, 2014, 12:35:39 am
UCMJ vs Constitution.

And in the middle is all of us who could be exposed to/infected by Ebola by those medical professionals given preferential treatment? I am not looking for the legal justification, I want to know the fargin logic.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: dbacksfan 2.0 on October 29, 2014, 01:33:24 am
And in the middle is all of us who could be exposed to/infected by Ebola by those medical professionals given preferential treatment? I am not looking for the legal justification, I want to know the fargin logic.

I'm not overly concerned, but I think that the US, for as much as we want believe that we are prepared for something like this, we're not. Not blaming any one of the alphabet of agencies, but it just seems that between the Fed level and the State level, there is no commonality of standards and practices, and for the most part it seems that there are minimal beds and facilities that could handle a serious outbreak. Reminds me of the cold war days where we had a certain number of Fallout Shelters and at best those were capable of only delaying the inevitable. Not trying to be fatalistic, just my own realistic view of how things might happen.

I don't think that the solution is gov't run hospitals with requirements for isolation wards, and I have had personal experience with an isolation ward/floor when the former MrsDbacks contracted meningitis and was held in isolation for 72 hours to try and determine what she had, whether it was viral or bacterial, and had to dress in a disposable gown, gloves, mask, shield, and boots to go into her room. The hospital she was in only had 8 rooms, and it was nothing near what they need for Ebola. At the time in Phoenix the total capacity for a metro area of 3+million people the amount of isolation rooms was way less than 1%, and a lot of hospitals had no isolation area.

I don't know what the answer is to be prepared, a hospital can't afford to maintain rooms for isolation that are not used 99% of the time, and they can't afford to have a large number of rooms that are not used in case of a large intake of people that need to be isolated, and moving patients around to accept and configure rooms.



Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: heironymouspasparagus on October 29, 2014, 09:45:20 am
I'm not overly concerned, but I think that the US, for as much as we want believe that we are prepared for something like this, we're not. Not blaming any one of the alphabet of agencies, but it just seems that between the Fed level and the State level, there is no commonality of standards and practices, and for the most part it seems that there are minimal beds and facilities that could handle a serious outbreak. Reminds me of the cold war days where we had a certain number of Fallout Shelters and at best those were capable of only delaying the inevitable. Not trying to be fatalistic, just my own realistic view of how things might happen.

I don't think that the solution is gov't run hospitals with requirements for isolation wards, and I have had personal experience with an isolation ward/floor when the former MrsDbacks contracted meningitis and was held in isolation for 72 hours to try and determine what she had, whether it was viral or bacterial, and had to dress in a disposable gown, gloves, mask, shield, and boots to go into her room. The hospital she was in only had 8 rooms, and it was nothing near what they need for Ebola. At the time in Phoenix the total capacity for a metro area of 3+million people the amount of isolation rooms was way less than 1%, and a lot of hospitals had no isolation area.

I don't know what the answer is to be prepared, a hospital can't afford to maintain rooms for isolation that are not used 99% of the time, and they can't afford to have a large number of rooms that are not used in case of a large intake of people that need to be isolated, and moving patients around to accept and configure rooms.




Problem solved - use the old 'tried and true' methods;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leper_colony

Or this;

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1079536/



Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: swake on October 30, 2014, 01:19:42 pm
Blackwell Schools are asking a teacher to be in quarantine for visiting Rwanda, which while it is in Africa does not have any Ebola cases and is more than a thousand miles from the impacted areas.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/10/28/ebola-rwanda-oklahoma-teacher_n_6062726.html



Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Hoss on October 30, 2014, 01:23:04 pm
Blackwell Schools are asking a teacher to be in quarantine for visiting Rwanda, which while it is in Africa does not have any Ebola cases and is more than a thousand miles from the impacted areas.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/10/28/ebola-rwanda-oklahoma-teacher_n_6062726.html



After being forced to by an online petition.

This indicates the level of education in our state.  IMO.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: swake on October 30, 2014, 01:31:35 pm
After being forced to by an online petition.

This indicates the level of education in our state.  IMO.

And the number of people that get their news via facebook comments


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Conan71 on October 30, 2014, 02:23:35 pm
Teh geographies are difficult for some people.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Townsend on October 30, 2014, 03:07:54 pm
As a collective, Oklahoma does a fair job of making itself look like a gaggle of dumbasses.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Red Arrow on October 30, 2014, 04:28:19 pm
Teh geographies are difficult for some people.

Rwanda is east of the Atlantic.  That should be good enough.

 ;D
 


Title: Re:
Post by: Ed W on October 30, 2014, 08:24:57 pm
Ch 6 is running a crawler saying that we may have an ebola case in Tulsa. By morning, people will be running in the streets with their hair on fire.

Ed W


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: heironymouspasparagus on October 30, 2014, 10:39:16 pm
There is a lot of talk about how only contact with bodily fluids can transmit the disease...

How about just the gaseous emissions from gastrointestinal systems in distress...some more noxious than others?  These contain bodily fluids in the form of mists/vapors.  The odors from the more noxious end usually are from hydrogen sulfide (sulfur) compounds - comparatively small molecules.  Plus some nitrogen, oxygen, water, and some larger smelly items (indole, skatole) created by gut bacteria.  Given the volume and velocity, it is highly likely that these things will be airborne for some time....with some level of virus mixed in the mess.  (If you can smell it, it is in the air...)

So, if you can smell it, the contamination would likely be present, so if you don't have filtering/isolation adequate to eliminate the odor, exposure to the virus should be very possible.



Related item;
If you can smell it, that means you are walking into the 'danger' zone of everything from bacteria to DNA from the source!   Are there lung disinfectants available...??



Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: dbacksfan 2.0 on October 31, 2014, 02:21:35 am
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7u08u8GA_rg[/youtube]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDAmPIq29ro[/youtube]




Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Breadburner on October 31, 2014, 07:18:43 am
Slow news day.....


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: swake on October 31, 2014, 07:29:49 am
He has Malaria

Run for your lives.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: heironymouspasparagus on October 31, 2014, 07:58:54 am
He has Malaria

Run for your lives.


That's pretty bad, too.

If ebola is transmitted by bodily fluids, and blood is a bodily fluid, then mosquitoes must be a vector, too.



Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Hoss on October 31, 2014, 08:06:45 am

That's pretty bad, too.

If ebola is transmitted by bodily fluids, and blood is a bodily fluid, then mosquitoes must be a vector, too.



http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/transmission/index.html?s_cid=cs_3923

Quote
There is no evidence that mosquitos or other insects can transmit Ebola virus.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: heironymouspasparagus on October 31, 2014, 08:20:29 am
http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/transmission/index.html?s_cid=cs_3923



They keep saying that....then there are cases where it just doesn't quite fit....

I think it is most likely that the "unexplained" transmissions are sloppy hygiene - endemic in this country where there is no excuse, and even bigger in places without clean water and cleaning capabilities.



Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Breadburner on October 31, 2014, 10:30:25 am

They keep saying that....then there are cases where it just doesn't quite fit....

I think it is most likely that the "unexplained" transmissions are sloppy hygiene - endemic in this country where there is no excuse, and even bigger in places without clean water and cleaning capabilities.



(http://i.ytimg.com/vi/MCn9lL94sxQ/maxresdefault.jpg)


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: heironymouspasparagus on October 31, 2014, 01:33:27 pm





So which face do you feed when you eat?  Or just share equally between them all - a few bites for all of you??



Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Hoss on October 31, 2014, 02:34:48 pm

They keep saying that....then there are cases where it just doesn't quite fit....

I think it is most likely that the "unexplained" transmissions are sloppy hygiene - endemic in this country where there is no excuse, and even bigger in places without clean water and cleaning capabilities.



You almost sounded like cabbage with this post...


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: guido911 on October 31, 2014, 04:40:47 pm
TNF is blessed to have such well respected and renowned infectious disease experts and physicians in this forum to make sure we all know the risks for transmission of Ebola, and also to let us as a nation know what we should be worried about. No need for all that hospital training that Tulsa hospitals are going through right now, because obviously they are overreacting. And the public, they are a bunch of dumb@sses. I mean, its not as if the military is being involuntarily quarantined by Obama for three weeks when they return from the hot zone.

Dr. Swake. Thanks for being you. Make sure you pass around your expertise to those stupid health care workers on the front lines of treatment who are too stupid to be as enlightened as you.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Breadburner on October 31, 2014, 08:00:49 pm
You almost sounded like cabbage with this post...

Bingo......!!


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Conan71 on October 31, 2014, 08:13:17 pm
TNF is blessed to have such well respected and renowned infectious disease experts and physicians in this forum to make sure we all know the risks for transmission of Ebola, and also to let us as a nation know what we should be worried about. No need for all that hospital training that Tulsa hospitals are going through right now, because obviously they are overreacting. And the public, they are a bunch of dumb@sses. I mean, its not as if the military is being involuntarily quarantined by Obama for three weeks when they return from the hot zone.

Dr. Swake. Thanks for being you. Make sure you pass around your expertise to those stupid health care workers on the front lines of treatment who are too stupid to be as enlightened as you.

I certainly applaud the Tulsa County Health Department for being diligent in following up.  But was it really necessary to release information that we had a “potential” ebola case in the timeframe they did that?  Less than 12 hours later, we find out it’s malaria.  How many people showed up at ER’s around the area in the last 12 hours with a slight fever, in a total panic, thinking they might have had contact with this guy? KRMG should get the Everest award for their effort on this molehill.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: guido911 on October 31, 2014, 08:45:58 pm
I certainly applaud the Tulsa County Health Department for being diligent in following up.  But was it really necessary to release information that we had a “potential” ebola case in the timeframe they did that?  Less than 12 hours later, we find out it’s malaria.  How many people showed up at ER’s around the area in the last 12 hours with a slight fever, in a total panic, thinking they might have had contact with this guy? KRMG should get the Everest award for their effort on this molehill.

The rumor mill had already been cranked up to 11, believe me. What I have been seeing, in my opinion, are health care workers fearing the unexpected, and their families and friends feeding off of it. I would be curious to know what the ER patient stats were, as well as admissions/discharges, at this particular hospital when the story broke.

As you can surmise, I do not blame anyone who is scared about this disease. Folks are getting mixed messages throughout all levels of government, and have got to be influenced tremendously by the very high death rate or even how its being politicized. It's natural and expected--except to those who are just smarter/braver etc.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: swake on October 31, 2014, 09:45:15 pm
"Mr Patient, we have good news for you. You have Malaria."


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: heironymouspasparagus on November 02, 2014, 09:05:30 pm
You almost sounded like cabbage with this post...


So, ..... are you saying the CDC is lying about everything they say about how to avoid this stuff?






Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Hoss on November 02, 2014, 09:13:12 pm

So, ..... are you saying the CDC is lying about everything they say about how to avoid this stuff?






No, but with your response it appears you don't believe them.  Or you're skeptical.  Skepticism is fine, however....

* More Americans have been dumped by Taylor Swift than have died from Ebola.
* More Americans have Leprosy in the US than have Ebola.  Are people freaking out from it?


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: heironymouspasparagus on November 02, 2014, 09:42:04 pm
No, but with your response it appears you don't believe them.  Or you're skeptical.  Skepticism is fine, however....

* More Americans have been dumped by Taylor Swift than have died from Ebola.
* More Americans have Leprosy in the US than have Ebola.  Are people freaking out from it?


Will attempt to clarify... yeah, I believe them.


This is what skeptics are saying....


They keep saying that....then there are cases where it just doesn't quite fit....

And this is the rebuttal to those skeptic thoughts, which is pretty much what I think;

I think it is most likely that the "unexplained" transmissions are sloppy hygiene - endemic in this country where there is no excuse, and even bigger in places without clean water and cleaning capabilities.

There is a lot of very bad hygiene habits in this country - check out the kitchen of just about any restaurant you eat at.  But we also know that the nurses in Dallas spent 2 full days (that is being admitted to) without proper PPE gear, as detailed by the CDC.  And that it was present at the hospital for use, but someone along the line told them no, you don't need that....    Could it have been management?

And for days afterward, the CDC "talking head" kept casting aspersions at nurses with the very definite implications that somehow they were responsible because they screwed up somehow.  Which the nurses didn't.

So, the CDC is mostly right - vastly mostly right...but they still can get quite a bit wrong - especially when, as a large government bureaucracy, they have to to try to find scapegoats..... On the medical side, though, there ain't much better in this country.


Seems like I posted something earlier about how we have 37,000 people die of flu every year....and there is probably a majority don't even get interested in that.  It will be interesting to see if people change their minds about quarantine if that nurse gets it....



Title: Re:
Post by: Ed W on November 02, 2014, 09:43:54 pm
The CDC said there were nearly 1000 bubonic plague deaths in the US between 1900 and 2010. Between 2000 and 2010, the average was 7 per year. Why is it that no one is screaming l "BLACK DEATH!" and running through the streets?

I predict this will all go away on Wednesday.

Ed W


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: heironymouspasparagus on November 04, 2014, 09:49:33 am
Fresh outbreak in Sierra Leone.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/nov/04/ebola-outbreak-sierra-leone


This thing will change - incubation times will stretch out (we have seen some of that already - even now breast milk can spread it for weeks to months).  Mortality rates will go down - otherwise the virus won't be able to replicate/propagate.



Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: guido911 on November 09, 2014, 06:05:41 am
This just breaks my heart.

http://www.pressherald.com/2014/11/07/kaci-hickox-boyfriend-leaving-maine-after-ebola-quarantine/

Can't help but think of this clip.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_b3oPslctA[/youtube]


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: Townsend on November 09, 2014, 08:43:39 am
This just breaks my heart.


Midterms are over.


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: patric on November 09, 2014, 11:55:53 am
I certainly applaud the Tulsa County Health Department for being diligent in following up.  But was it really necessary to release information that we had a “potential” ebola case in the timeframe they did that?  Less than 12 hours later, we find out it’s malaria.  How many people showed up at ER’s around the area in the last 12 hours with a slight fever, in a total panic, thinking they might have had contact with this guy? KRMG should get the Everest award for their effort on this molehill.

Other than the state taking an old OU Medical building out of mothballs to use as an infectious ward in OKC, the local health departments are who is running the show (or at least managing the media).
Personally, I feel much better knowing the passenger EMSA wheeled thru the middle of Tulsa International Airport only had malaria.  ::)


Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: heironymouspasparagus on November 11, 2014, 04:42:48 pm
This just breaks my heart.

Can't help but think of this clip.



Well, they ARE part of the "Me" generation....after all, they are more important than the rest of us....



Title: Re: Ebola
Post by: guido911 on November 17, 2014, 04:32:30 pm
Attention wanter no longer wants attention, thank you very much...

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/kaci-hickox-stop-calling-me-ebola-nurse?utm_content=buffer00d03&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer