|
Title: Neighbors Protest Brookside Surface Parking Expansion Post by: patric on October 27, 2011, 12:45:59 pm http://www.tmapc.org/Agenda/11-02-11/Letter%20to%20TMAPC%20KJRH%20parking%20community.pdf
Title: Re: Neighbors Protest Brookside Surface Parking Expansion Post by: Townsend on October 27, 2011, 12:57:08 pm Not really sure where the expansion is. Could you elaborate please?
Not that is matters. No more surface parking is needed in my opinion. I'd just like to know what space they're considering. Title: Re: Neighbors Protest Brookside Surface Parking Expansion Post by: patric on October 27, 2011, 01:05:52 pm Not really sure where the expansion is. Could you elaborate please? Not that is matters. No more surface parking is needed in my opinion. I'd just like to know what space they're considering. East, into the residential area. They are seeking to rezone the R district. http://www.tmapc.org/Agenda/11-02-11/PUD-789.pdf Title: Re: Neighbors Protest Brookside Surface Parking Expansion Post by: Townsend on October 27, 2011, 01:13:02 pm East, into the residential area. They are seeking to rezone the R district. http://www.tmapc.org/Agenda/11-02-11/PUD-789.pdf So channel 2 wants more parking. That's not neighborly. Title: Re: Neighbors Protest Brookside Surface Parking Expansion Post by: Teatownclown on October 27, 2011, 01:45:04 pm Interesting. Which lieyar did KJRH hire? Lou? Roy? Tanner did the crayons.
PUD's were not invented for this approach to zoning. Staff does not support rezoning but does support a PUD. The "master plan" (exhibit F) is clear in intent with regard to the area from Crow Creek south to I 44. Odds are 23 to 1 of this happening. And my bets on taking the odds and KJRH. There is precedent and the change conforms. Dern NIMBY's Title: Re: Neighbors Protest Brookside Surface Parking Expansion Post by: BKDotCom on October 31, 2011, 01:16:43 pm Isn't it obvious to the neighbors?? They need to call the Problem Solvers at "Two Works For You".
|