The Tulsa Forum by TulsaNow

Talk About Tulsa => Other Tulsa Discussion => Topic started by: TheTed on May 14, 2009, 01:33:54 pm



Title: Downtown pedestrian/cyclist issues thread
Post by: TheTed on May 14, 2009, 01:33:54 pm
I'll start this thread, as I have plenty of beef with downtown as a pedestrian.

*The Civic Center plaza is not a parking lot. If you park on Denver, at least cars have room to go around. When a UPS truck is parked on the sidewalk there's hardly any room for a pedestrian to go around. Nevermind the extremely hazardous situation caused when a wheelchair user tries to go around.

*The sidewalk is the pedestrian thoroughfare. You don't get to block it with your car. Parking lot operators: you don't get to block it with your giant parking signs or your yellow caution tape. Your car will be kicked and have debris thrown on it. Signs or yellow tape will be removed by me, and if you're lucky, you'll be able to find your parking signs.

*Automobile operators: Don't stop in the crosswalk. I reserve the right to kick your car if you do.

*Drivers on Sixth Street by the courthouse: those giant, well-marked crosswalks mean you have to stop for pedestrians. I don't think you want to risk running down a lawyer in a crosswalk.

These are all things that major city cops can and do ticket for regularly. Tulsa cops, stop missing out on all this revenue and start issuing tickets for flagrant disregard of pedestrians' rights. You wouldn't allow me to park my car halfway out in the street all day, yet you allow people to park in spots that block the sidewalk all day every day.


Title: Re: Downtown pedestrian/cyclist issues thread
Post by: rwarn17588 on May 14, 2009, 01:38:38 pm
Between kicking vehicles and throwing stuff, you're cruisin' for a bruisin'. Or at least a road-rage incident. You probably ought to cool it.


Title: Re: Downtown pedestrian/cyclist issues thread
Post by: Conan71 on May 14, 2009, 02:43:19 pm
Sidewalk rage???


Title: Re: Downtown pedestrian/cyclist issues thread
Post by: nathanm on May 14, 2009, 07:21:15 pm
Blocking the sidewalk to load or unload is one thing. I don't mind if someone blocks a lane on the street to do their loading or unloading, so why should it bother me if someone blocks part of the sidewalk for that reason?

Parking on the sidewalk is a completely different thing and should be aggressively ticketed. Signage that blocks a sidewalk should be confiscated. However, signage placed in such a way to be on the sidewalk but not blocking it (either by placing it next to a streetlamp or in another relatively out of the way location) should be allowed.


Title: Re: Downtown pedestrian/cyclist issues thread
Post by: custosnox on May 14, 2009, 09:10:06 pm
Blocking the sidewalk to load or unload is one thing. I don't mind if someone blocks a lane on the street to do their loading or unloading, so why should it bother me if someone blocks part of the sidewalk for that reason?

Parking on the sidewalk is a completely different thing and should be aggressively ticketed. Signage that blocks a sidewalk should be confiscated. However, signage placed in such a way to be on the sidewalk but not blocking it (either by placing it next to a streetlamp or in another relatively out of the way location) should be allowed.
You just want to collect shame on signs.  Come on, admit it.


Title: Re: Downtown pedestrian/cyclist issues thread
Post by: nathanm on May 15, 2009, 12:47:21 am
You just want to collect shame on signs.  Come on, admit it.
Shame On. Guaranteed to make the holder feel better about themselves! Shame On. Only $19.95. Shame On!


Title: Re: Downtown pedestrian/cyclist issues thread
Post by: Conan71 on May 15, 2009, 07:23:36 am
Shame On. Guaranteed to make the holder feel better about themselves! Shame On. Only $19.95. Shame On!

Awesomeness!


Title: Re: Downtown pedestrian/cyclist issues thread
Post by: SXSW on May 15, 2009, 09:46:46 am
I'd personally like to see a dedicated bikeway through downtown.  A good route I noticed biking the MV trail was Cincinnati.  Right now Cincinnati becomes a one way one-lane street as it crosses Hwy. 51/75 south of downtown.  I'd propose making this overpass for bicycles only and an extension of the MV trail north from Maple Park into downtown.  Then have one of the 5 lanes of Cincinnati, probably the one on the west side of the street, become a dedicated bike lane all the way through downtown up to OSU-Tulsa to connect to the MV trail there.  This would provide a direct route from downtown to the river, and better connect Uptown, Cherry Street, and Maple Ridge to downtown for cyclists.


Title: Re: Downtown pedestrian/cyclist issues thread
Post by: Ed W on May 15, 2009, 02:35:23 pm
Tulsa already has bike lanes along Archer, Mohawk, and some others.  They're poorly designed and poorly maintained, yet we're supposed to believe that if they simply install more of them, the conditions will somehow get better?

Learn some simple vehicular cycling techniques and all this is moot.  Every road becomes suitable for bicyclists.


Title: Re: Downtown pedestrian/cyclist issues thread
Post by: sauerkraut on May 15, 2009, 02:41:17 pm
Yeah, you kick my heap in the crosswalk, I reserve the right to kick you right back. What do ya think of that? There has to be room for everyone. Maybe if you circle around the block you can avoid the UPS truck. :-X


Title: Re: Downtown pedestrian/cyclist issues thread
Post by: TURobY on May 15, 2009, 02:48:34 pm
With the weather improving, I've been riding my bike to work again. I try to keep on neighborhood streets when at all possible. But the few times that I've had to ride on arterials, car drivers seems to be fairly easy with which to co-exist. I'm too nervous to ride on the street at this point, mainly because I'm out-of-shape and would create more of a hinderance to traffic than its worth. LOL


Title: Re: Downtown pedestrian/cyclist issues thread
Post by: sauerkraut on May 15, 2009, 02:57:44 pm
I don't even know if I can ride a bike it's been so long. I have a old 10 speed from 1984 that sits in storage. I don't enjoy cycling much and never did. Many people I see on the trails seem to like the sport of cycling. I never could get into it and I kept getting flat tires all the time. I do alot of jogging that's a sport I can handle. I rode some motor dirt bikes  and a I had a fair number of crashes on them. :-X


Title: Re: Downtown pedestrian/cyclist issues thread
Post by: TheTed on May 15, 2009, 05:29:40 pm
Yeah, you kick my heap in the crosswalk, I reserve the right to kick you right back. What do ya think of that? There has to be room for everyone. Maybe if you circle around the block you can avoid the UPS truck. :-X
We have traffic rules for many reasons. Tulsa Police don't seem to care about pedestrian traffic issues, only car traffic issues. If you can't park in a driving lane on the street, you can't park on the sidewalk. Drivers are not any more important than pedestrians.

My porch is kinda small. I think I'll BBQ in a traffic lane on Denver Avenue. You can just go around. That makes just as much sense as parking your car on the sidewalk.

All I'm asking is for Tulsa police to make an attempt to care about pedestrians. Try to park on the sidewalk or block a crosswalk in New York City or Philly and see what happens. Unlike in Tulsa, cops actually care about the safety of pedestrians.


Title: Re: Downtown pedestrian/cyclist issues thread
Post by: nathanm on May 15, 2009, 06:39:45 pm
We have traffic rules for many reasons. Tulsa Police don't seem to care about pedestrian traffic issues, only car traffic issues. If you can't park in a driving lane on the street, you can't park on the sidewalk. Drivers are not any more important than pedestrians.
He's from Columbus, Ohio, where it's perfectly legal to park in the right lane almost anywhere in town.


Title: Re: Downtown pedestrian/cyclist issues thread
Post by: Red Arrow on May 16, 2009, 05:43:25 pm
He's from Columbus, Ohio, where it's perfectly legal to park in the right lane almost anywhere in town.
Unlike Boston (visit in 1982) where it was not legal but all the delivery vehicles did it anyway.


Title: Re: Downtown pedestrian/cyclist issues thread
Post by: TheTed on May 20, 2009, 11:48:39 am
Quote
Imagine narrow European-style roadways shared by pedestrians, cyclists and cars, all traveling at low speeds. Sidewalks made of recycled rubber in different colors under sleek energy-efficient lamps. Mini-islands jutting into the street, topped by trees and landscaping, designed to further slow traffic and add a dash of green.
...
Urban planners say that the document is long overdue, and that it promises to be as much a map to the future as it is a handbook for the present: getting people to think about streets as not just thoroughfares for cars, but as public spaces incorporating safety, aesthetics, environmental and community concerns.
New York City issues street design manual (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/20/nyregion/20streets.html?_r=1&amp%3Bref=nyregion)

This sounds great and it also sounds like the exact opposite of Tulsa streets.


Title: Re: Downtown pedestrian/cyclist issues thread
Post by: TheTed on June 19, 2009, 12:57:09 pm
We need some right turn on red enforcement in this city. If you try to cross at the crosswalk at Riverside and Denver, there's at least a 75% chance somebody will come flying through that crosswalk turning right off Riverside onto Denver when you have the walk signal.

I'm not sure why more tickets aren't given out for things other than speeding. It takes about 30 seconds of watching traffic to see somebody doing something illegal: not signaling, changing three lanes in one movement, stopping in the crosswalk, failing to grasp the concept of right on red, etc.