The Tulsa Forum by TulsaNow

Not At My Table - Political Discussions => National & International Politics => Topic started by: TulsaSue on August 06, 2008, 02:23:24 PM

Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: TulsaSue on August 06, 2008, 02:23:24 PM
I didn't know much about him, so I decided I'd better find out. So I started researching, and I put my research in to a kind of scrapbook. If you wonder who this guy is, go to http://obamascrapbook.com (//%22http://obamascrapbook.com%22) and see what I found out!
Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: Breadburner on August 06, 2008, 02:28:02 PM
I will save you the trouble.....

(http://www1.istockphoto.com/file_thumbview_approve/509135/2/istockphoto_509135_empty_suit.jpg)
Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: Hoss on August 06, 2008, 03:14:36 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Breadburner

I will save you the trouble.....

(http://www1.istockphoto.com/file_thumbview_approve/509135/2/istockphoto_509135_empty_suit.jpg)



That actually looks like McSame if you put him in front of a white backdrop.

[:O]
Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: waterboy on August 06, 2008, 03:25:25 PM
I'm curious. Did you pay the royalty fee for that illustration Bread Man?
Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: USRufnex on August 06, 2008, 09:28:38 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Breadburner

I will save you the trouble.....

(http://www1.istockphoto.com/file_thumbview_approve/509135/2/istockphoto_509135_empty_suit.jpg)



Let us know when you'd like to doggie-paddle from the shallow end of the thinking-man's pool...


Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: TulsaSue on August 11, 2008, 09:04:30 AM
Just to let you know, The site is much more readable now.  Check it out at http://obamascrapbook.com (//%22http://obamascrapbook.com%22)
Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: TulsaSue on August 11, 2008, 09:34:25 AM
I have redone the website so it's easier to read.

http://obamascrapbook.com (//%22http://obamascrapbook.com%22)
Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: FOTD on August 11, 2008, 11:25:22 AM
quote:
Originally posted by TulsaSue

I have redone the website so it's easier to read.

http://obamascrapbook.com (//%22http://obamascrapbook.com%22)



Let it grow, Sue! Let it grow!

A+
Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: TulsaSue on August 12, 2008, 06:31:04 AM
I think it's going viral! Had over a 1000 hits yesterday. Was picked up by Politico.  Whee!
Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: shadows on August 16, 2008, 04:12:00 AM
Who is he?

NEXT PRESIDENT.
Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: FOTD on August 16, 2008, 12:13:17 PM
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080901/barackytwo_video

Obama way......
Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: guido911 on August 18, 2008, 10:58:59 AM
Who is this guy Obama? Don't ask me, that's above my pay grade.
Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: guido911 on August 18, 2008, 02:03:52 PM
quote:
Originally posted by guido911

Who is this guy Obama? Don't ask me, that's above my pay grade.



Did I miss the part in the scrapbook where it is pointed out that Obama lied about his vote as an Illinois senator that had the effect of endorsing infanticide?

http://www.nysun.com/national/obama-facing-attacks-from-all-sides-over-abortion/84059/
Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: FOTD on August 18, 2008, 02:40:43 PM
You're really reaching Guido.....does not seem your back up slammers are here anymore.....maybe they can read what's in the future too....sorry.
Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: guido911 on August 18, 2008, 03:51:04 PM
quote:
Originally posted by FOTD

You're really reaching Guido.....does not seem your back up slammers are here anymore.....maybe they can read what's in the future too....sorry.



Whatever douchebag. Seems as though Oklahoma is not buying into Obama-mania. I guess we dumb Okies are too busing clinging to our guns and religion:

http://www.kfor.com/global/story.asp?s=8859562
Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: Hoss on August 18, 2008, 06:15:13 PM
quote:
Originally posted by guido911

quote:
Originally posted by FOTD

You're really reaching Guido.....does not seem your back up slammers are here anymore.....maybe they can read what's in the future too....sorry.



Whatever douchebag. Seems as though Oklahoma is not buying into Obama-mania. I guess we dumb Okies are too busing clinging to our guns and religion:

http://www.kfor.com/global/story.asp?s=8859562




Oklahoma NEVER buys into anything that's blue.  Never voted for Clinton during his term, and I believe didn't vote for Carter (yeesh).

I wouldn't read too much into that, since we only have 7 electoral votes, and the Repukes always count on OK for that.
Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: TulsaSue on August 20, 2008, 01:12:32 PM
Hummm . . . That's why my efforts are to reach those outside of Oklahoma. I am afraid that Oklahoma is a lost cause.

But, almost 10,000 people have viewed http://obamascrapbook.com (//%22http://obamascrapbook.com%22) so far, and they spend an average of about 8 minutes reading it, so I hope it's doing some good combating the Swiftboaters.  There'll be more to come!!
Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: TulsaSue on August 20, 2008, 01:13:12 PM
Hummm . . . That's why my efforts are to reach those outside of Oklahoma. I am afraid that Oklahoma is a lost cause.

But, almost 10,000 people have viewed http://obamascrapbook so far, and they spend an average of about 8 minutes reading it, so I hope it's doing some good combating the Swiftboaters.  There'll be more to come!!
Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: FOTD on August 20, 2008, 01:39:29 PM
quote:
Originally posted by TulsaSue

Hummm . . . That's why my efforts are to reach those outside of Oklahoma. I am afraid that Oklahoma is a lost cause.

But, almost 10,000 people have viewed http://obamascrapbook.com (//%22http://obamascrapbook.com%22) so far, and they spend an average of about 8 minutes reading it, so I hope it's doing some good combating the Swiftboaters.  There'll be more to come!!



It got my devilish attention and that's saying a ton.

FOTD thinks there will be some tremendous video production of what Obama is and what he will do next week that will be utilized throughout the cam pain.
The film and speakers will make the Repukes convention the next week appear disabled and wrinkley, old and white, mean and hateful......just an easy prediction. Oh the contrast between what we could be and what we are as aresult of 10 years of creepy domination by neo-con extremists. You know those Hollywood types are working up some good film......
Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: Rico on August 21, 2008, 12:57:18 PM
BAGHDAD - Iraq and the U.S. have reached preliminary agreement to withdraw American forces from Iraqi cities by next June, six years into the increasingly unpopular war, Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari said Thursday after meeting with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.



Sounds strangely like a timetable we heard about recently.

Oh I am terribly sorry.... "Time horizon." to be politically correct and grant equal time to both candidates...
My how 100 years can just fly right on by...
Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: waterboy on August 21, 2008, 02:25:49 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Rico

BAGHDAD - Iraq and the U.S. have reached preliminary agreement to withdraw American forces from Iraqi cities by next June, six years into the increasingly unpopular war, Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari said Thursday after meeting with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.



Sounds strangely like a timetable we heard about recently.

Oh I am terribly sorry.... "Time horizon." to be politically correct and grant equal time to both candidates...
My how 100 years can just fly right on by...



That's because republicans recently realized "WE WON" don'tchaknow.
Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: guido911 on August 21, 2008, 04:51:24 PM
Here's another clip for your Obama scrapbook:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m89m0pC_bpY&eurl=http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/21/brutal-new-ad-hammers-obama-over-ayers/
Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: FOTD on August 21, 2008, 05:00:35 PM
quote:
Originally posted by guido911

Here's another clip for your Obama scrapbook:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m89m0pC_bpY&eurl=http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/21/brutal-new-ad-hammers-obama-over-ayers/


Guido dear, devil wonders when your candidate will advertise his plan for the country's future rather than these stupid personal attack ads against an Obama who was only 14 years old at that time in the ad. BTW, the devil has had contact with many revolutionary types. But the devil is no revoltion.

I'll gather, guido, you are aligning yourself with the low grade candidate on the basis you fear Obama.....even though you are not certain why you fear Obama....but don't fear a flake and warrior like McInsane.
Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: FOTD on August 23, 2008, 12:35:46 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVi4rUzf-0Q&eurl=http://www.buzzflash.com/

DON'T BE AFRAID!
Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: Crash Daily on August 23, 2008, 03:30:51 PM
If Dims had anything to do with it, we wouldn't BE in a position to be winning in Iraq at this point in time. Now you want to take the flag and run with it? Idiots. This little stunt won't fly the flag. It's still under a Dim, you know, traitors, that tried to cost us the war.  It's hype and B.S. and you can only use it now because we didn't let you force America to lose the war. Your all a bunch of Jane Fond B*tch's.

The 100 years comment is fully taken out of context. But of course, you already know that. The fact that we, meaning NOT Dims, were willing to stay as long as it takes, is demoralizing to the enemy. You were willing to throw away our blood and treasure just to hand Bush a loss. You people are shallow and pathetic. Your ENTIRE PARTY. Your willingness to cost us the war, almost, not quite, but almost from the outset, has been lending aid and comfort to the enemy. You prolonged this war, giving the terrorists hope that we would pull out at any point you bunch if cretins and you can't even see it. Do you realize Ahmadinejad wants B.O. for president? I bet Osama wants Obama as well. If I were wanting to defeat the U.S., I would always support a Liberal.

Iraq is a sovereign nation. If they want to set a time table, because they feel we've done enough and they are secure enough, that's good. Even if we disagree. That does not make McCain wrong and B.O. right. McCain was still correct in his assessment of staying until the job is done and B.O. is still wrong for wanting to pull the rug out before we were certain. We're still not, but if Iraq is, it's their call. They have years to back track if things get out of hand. Go back and look at B.O.'s reasoning for a time table. It wasn't about already being secure, it was about pulling out whether Iraq was ready or not, so get off your high horse, it's all B.S.

That scrap book is exactly what it says it is. Scrap. B.O. is an inexperienced empty suit that sticks his foot in his mouth E-V-E-R-Y time he's not being spoon fed by a teleprompter. Judging if it is wrong to murder BORN babies is above his pay grade? The guy is an idiot. I see where he's been back tracking and trying to clean that little spill up, the same way his idiot @SS and his handlers have to go back and lie to cover his mistakes of speaking what's echoing around, to be repeated like a parrot, in that empty chamber of a brain, every time he doesn't have SOMEONE ELSE'S THOUGHTS put in front of his empty suited @SS to read. What a joke. He's a perfect fit for your party. Even better than Billary.
Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: waterboy on August 23, 2008, 04:13:32 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Crash Daily

If Dims had anything to do with it, we wouldn't BE in a position to be winning in Iraq at this point in time. Now you want to take the flag and run with it? Idiots. This little stunt won't fly the flag. It's still under a Dim, you know, traitors, that tried to cost us the war.  It's hype and B.S. and you can only use it now because we didn't let you force America to lose the war. Your all a bunch of Jane Fond B*tch's.

The 100 years comment is fully taken out of context. But of course, you already know that. The fact that we, meaning NOT Dims, were willing to stay as long as it takes, is demoralizing to the enemy. You were willing to throw away our blood and treasure just to hand Bush a loss. You people are shallow and pathetic. Your ENTIRE PARTY. Your willingness to cost us the war, almost, not quite, but almost from the outset, has been lending aid and comfort to the enemy. You prolonged this war, giving the terrorists hope that we would pull out at any point you bunch if cretins and you can't even see it. Do you realize Ahmadinejad wants B.O. for president? I bet Osama wants Obama as well. If I were wanting to defeat the U.S., I would always support a Liberal.

Iraq is a sovereign nation. If they want to set a time table, because they feel we've done enough and they are secure enough, that's good. Even if we disagree. That does not make McCain wrong and B.O. right. McCain was still correct in his assessment of staying until the job is done and B.O. is still wrong for wanting to pull the rug out before we were certain. We're still not, but if Iraq is, it's their call. They have years to back track if things get out of hand. Go back and look at B.O.'s reasoning for a time table. It wasn't about already being secure, it was about pulling out whether Iraq was ready or not, so get off your high horse, it's all B.S.

That scrap book is exactly what it says it is. Scrap. B.O. is an inexperienced empty suit that sticks his foot in his mouth E-V-E-R-Y time he's not being spoon fed by a teleprompter. Judging if it is wrong to murder BORN babies is above his pay grade? The guy is an idiot. I see where he's been back tracking and trying to clean that little spill up, the same way his idiot @SS and his handlers have to go back and lie to cover his mistakes of speaking what's echoing around, to be repeated like a parrot, in that empty chamber of a brain, every time he doesn't have SOMEONE ELSE'S THOUGHTS put in front of his empty suited @SS to read. What a joke. He's a perfect fit for your party. Even better than Billary.



Yeah, insightful. You're really on to some stuff there Crash. Say, didn't I see a pic of you on one of the other threads? That Crack on the highway thread? That was you lodged in the crack.
Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: USRufnex on August 23, 2008, 04:18:29 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Crash Daily

If Dims had anything to do with it, we wouldn't BE in a position to be winning in Iraq at this point in time. Now you want to take the flag and run with it? Idiots. This little stunt won't fly the flag. It's still under a Dim, you know, traitors, that tried to cost us the war.  It's hype and B.S. and you can only use it now because we didn't let you force America to lose the war. Your all a bunch of Jane Fond B*tch's.

-------------


^^^Republican say-anything propagandist at work.

Hey, Crash......

(http://blogs.tampabay.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/03/31/bull_durham.jpg)

"You just got lesson number one: don't think; it can only hurt the ball club."

"The rose goes in the front, big guy."



Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: Chicken Little on August 23, 2008, 04:44:00 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Crash Daily

If Dims had anything to do with it, we wouldn't BE in a position to be winning in Iraq at this point in time. Now you want to take the flag and run with it? Idiots. This little stunt won't fly the flag. It's still under a Dim, you know, traitors, that tried to cost us the war.  It's hype and B.S. and you can only use it now because we didn't let you force America to lose the war. Your all a bunch of Jane Fond B*tch's.

Do you get paid for this crap?  Your boy Bushie is about to sign a "cut and run" (//%22http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-ed-iraq23-2008aug23,0,1093339.story%22) deal, by the way; timetable of 2011 and everthing...the whole shebang!

Man, you must feel like an idiot; a complete and utter jackass.  It must be hard knowing that your war-hero Bush is turning his back on the troops.  But forget the troops, right?  Bush turned "traitor" on YOU; that's gotta be painful.  I mean, you stuck with him through thick and thin.  Geez, I mean, Bush is such a hypocrite.  To defend him now would just make you a hypocrite too, right?  You'd sound like a TOTAL moron if you said anything nice about that flag-burning cut-and-runner Bush, right?

quote:
That does not make McCain wrong and B.O. right.
That's exactly what it does, you bucket-head.
Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: Hoss on August 23, 2008, 07:19:50 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Crash Daily

If Dims had anything to do with it, we wouldn't BE in a position to be winning in Iraq at this point in time. Now you want to take the flag and run with it? Idiots. This little stunt won't fly the flag. It's still under a Dim, you know, traitors, that tried to cost us the war.  It's hype and B.S. and you can only use it now because we didn't let you force America to lose the war. Your all a bunch of Jane Fond B*tch's.

The 100 years comment is fully taken out of context. But of course, you already know that. The fact that we, meaning NOT Dims, were willing to stay as long as it takes, is demoralizing to the enemy. You were willing to throw away our blood and treasure just to hand Bush a loss. You people are shallow and pathetic. Your ENTIRE PARTY. Your willingness to cost us the war, almost, not quite, but almost from the outset, has been lending aid and comfort to the enemy. You prolonged this war, giving the terrorists hope that we would pull out at any point you bunch if cretins and you can't even see it. Do you realize Ahmadinejad wants B.O. for president? I bet Osama wants Obama as well. If I were wanting to defeat the U.S., I would always support a Liberal.

Iraq is a sovereign nation. If they want to set a time table, because they feel we've done enough and they are secure enough, that's good. Even if we disagree. That does not make McCain wrong and B.O. right. McCain was still correct in his assessment of staying until the job is done and B.O. is still wrong for wanting to pull the rug out before we were certain. We're still not, but if Iraq is, it's their call. They have years to back track if things get out of hand. Go back and look at B.O.'s reasoning for a time table. It wasn't about already being secure, it was about pulling out whether Iraq was ready or not, so get off your high horse, it's all B.S.

That scrap book is exactly what it says it is. Scrap. B.O. is an inexperienced empty suit that sticks his foot in his mouth E-V-E-R-Y time he's not being spoon fed by a teleprompter. Judging if it is wrong to murder BORN babies is above his pay grade? The guy is an idiot. I see where he's been back tracking and trying to clean that little spill up, the same way his idiot @SS and his handlers have to go back and lie to cover his mistakes of speaking what's echoing around, to be repeated like a parrot, in that empty chamber of a brain, every time he doesn't have SOMEONE ELSE'S THOUGHTS put in front of his empty suited @SS to read. What a joke. He's a perfect fit for your party. Even better than Billary.



I'm wondering how dizzy you are after all that spinning.....
Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: guido911 on August 24, 2008, 03:06:09 PM
Who is this guy Obama?  He's the guy that thinks the U.S. has 57 states...Oops, I mean 58 states counting Eau Claire:

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2008/08/24/make-58-states-obama-adds-eau-claire-list
Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: USRufnex on August 24, 2008, 10:58:39 PM
Yeah, Obama simply mispoke... Newsbusters.org?!?  LOL... no political agenda or axe to grind there.  /sarcasm

 [:o)]
Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: Hoss on August 24, 2008, 11:01:05 PM
quote:
Originally posted by guido911

Who is this guy Obama?  He's the guy that thinks the U.S. has 57 states...Oops, I mean 58 states counting Eau Claire:

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2008/08/24/make-58-states-obama-adds-eau-claire-list



I'll change it up now...

(http://sirkoolaid.googlepages.com/kool_aid_man_glass.jpg)
Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: Crash Daily on August 24, 2008, 11:28:43 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Chicken Little

quote:
Originally posted by Crash Daily

If Dims had anything to do with it, we wouldn't BE in a position to be winning in Iraq at this point in time. Now you want to take the flag and run with it? Idiots. This little stunt won't fly the flag. It's still under a Dim, you know, traitors, that tried to cost us the war.  It's hype and B.S. and you can only use it now because we didn't let you force America to lose the war. Your all a bunch of Jane Fond B*tch's.

Do you get paid for this crap?  Your boy Bushie is about to sign a "cut and run" (//%22http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-ed-iraq23-2008aug23,0,1093339.story%22) deal, by the way; timetable of 2011 and everthing...the whole shebang!

Man, you must feel like an idiot; a complete and utter jackass.  It must be hard knowing that your war-hero Bush is turning his back on the troops.  But forget the troops, right?  Bush turned "traitor" on YOU; that's gotta be painful.  I mean, you stuck with him through thick and thin.  Geez, I mean, Bush is such a hypocrite.  To defend him now would just make you a hypocrite too, right?  You'd sound like a TOTAL moron if you said anything nice about that flag-burning cut-and-runner Bush, right?

quote:
That does not make McCain wrong and B.O. right.
That's exactly what it does, you bucket-head.



Nice editing moron. You forgot to mention the fact that I M-E-N-T-I-O-N-E-D Iraq has every right to choose to have a timetable, even if we disagree. The Bush Admin, probably not expecting it to bite them in the @SS, made that clear years ago when you buffoons first started trying to cost America the war. You obviously read my post, so either you're a complete idiot or you intentionally left out the most important part, misleading and spinning this little post, ignoring the facts, as it appears you are quite good at. Which is it? There's no third option, you're a liar or an idiot. Which is it? My vote's on liar. As I said staying as long as it takes vs. trying to cost us the war. This current choice is Iraq's. When you trash on someone in specific, try to put those two corroded brain cells together and come up with a coherent argument.

I don't carry Bush's water either. I have plenty of problems with him and even more with McCain. When idiot Dim's give us no choice but to vote, by throwing supreme morons like Gore, Kerry and Obama at us, we haven't got much choice but to smell sh*t instead of eating it. Lieberman WAS the only sane man left in your Party. WAS. He's still way to left for me, but he's the only one that doesn't try to hide who he is and what he really stands for, that's actually close enough to the middle to be palatable. You should have nominated him when you had the chance. Bush would have been gone four years ago.
Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: USRufnex on August 24, 2008, 11:43:00 PM
Obama was right on the Iraq war.... you are wrong.

I know right from wrong... you're just a right wing cartoon character buffoon who has no clue...

Idiot.  You are complete raving moron lunatic idiot.

Remarks of Illinois State Sen. Barack Obama Against Going to War with Iraq
| October 02, 2002


http://www.barackobama.com/2002/10/02/remarks_of_illinois_state_sen.php

Good afternoon. Let me begin by saying that although this has been billed as an anti-war rally, I stand before you as someone who is not opposed to war in all circumstances. The Civil War was one of the bloodiest in history, and yet it was only through the crucible of the sword, the sacrifice of multitudes, that we could begin to perfect this union, and drive the scourge of slavery from our soil. I don't oppose all wars.

My grandfather signed up for a war the day after Pearl Harbor was bombed, fought in Patton's army. He saw the dead and dying across the fields of Europe; he heard the stories of fellow troops who first entered Auschwitz and Treblinka. He fought in the name of a larger freedom, part of that arsenal of democracy that triumphed over evil, and he did not fight in vain. I don't oppose all wars.

After September 11th, after witnessing the carnage and destruction, the dust and the tears, I supported this administration's pledge to hunt down and root out those who would slaughter innocents in the name of intolerance, and I would willingly take up arms myself to prevent such tragedy from happening again. I don't oppose all wars. And I know that in this crowd today, there is no shortage of patriots, or of patriotism.

What I am opposed to is a dumb war. What I am opposed to is a rash war. What I am opposed to is the cynical attempt by Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz and other armchair, weekend warriors in this administration to shove their own ideological agendas down our throats, irrespective of the costs in lives lost and in hardships borne.

What I am opposed to is the attempt by political hacks like Karl Rove to distract us from a rise in the uninsured, a rise in the poverty rate, a drop in the median income - to distract us from corporate scandals and a stock market that has just gone through the worst month since the Great Depression. That's what I'm opposed to. A dumb war. A rash war. A war based not on reason but on passion, not on principle but on politics. Now let me be clear - I suffer no illusions about Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal man. A ruthless man. A man who butchers his own people to secure his own power. He has repeatedly defied UN resolutions, thwarted UN inspection teams, developed chemical and biological weapons, and coveted nuclear capacity. He's a bad guy. The world, and the Iraqi people, would be better off without him.

But I also know that Saddam poses no imminent and direct threat to the United States, or to his neighbors, that the Iraqi economy is in shambles, that the Iraqi military a fraction of its former strength, and that in concert with the international community he can be contained until, in the way of all petty dictators, he falls away into the dustbin of history. I know that even a successful war against Iraq will require a US occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences. I know that an invasion of Iraq without a clear rationale and without strong international support will only fan the flames of the Middle East, and encourage the worst, rather than best, impulses of the Arab world, and strengthen the recruitment arm of Al Qaeda. I am not opposed to all wars. I'm opposed to dumb wars.

So for those of us who seek a more just and secure world for our children, let us send a clear message to the President today. You want a fight, President Bush? Let's finish the fight with Bin Laden and Al Qaeda, through effective, coordinated intelligence, and a shutting down of the financial networks that support terrorism, and a homeland security program that involves more than color-coded warnings. You want a fight, President Bush?

Let's fight to make sure that the UN inspectors can do their work, and that we vigorously enforce a non-proliferation treaty, and that former enemies and current allies like Russia safeguard and ultimately eliminate their stores of nuclear material, and that nations like Pakistan and India never use the terrible weapons already in their possession, and that the arms merchants in our own country stop feeding the countless wars that rage across the globe. You want a fight, President Bush?

Let's fight to make sure our so-called allies in the Middle East, the Saudis and the Egyptians, stop oppressing their own people, and suppressing dissent, and tolerating corruption and inequality, and mismanaging their economies so that their youth grow up without education, without prospects, without hope, the ready recruits of terrorist cells. You want a fight, President Bush? Let's fight to wean ourselves off Middle East oil, through an energy policy that doesn't simply serve the interests of Exxon and Mobil. Those are the battles that we need to fight. Those are the battles that we willingly join. The battles against ignorance and intolerance. Corruption and greed. Poverty and despair.

The consequences of war are dire, the sacrifices immeasurable. We may have occasion in our lifetime to once again rise up in defense of our freedom, and pay the wages of war. But we ought not -- we will not -- travel down that hellish path blindly. Nor should we allow those who would march off and pay the ultimate sacrifice, who would prove the full measure of devotion with their blood, to make such an awful sacrifice in vain.



Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: Hoss on August 24, 2008, 11:49:32 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Crash Daily

quote:
Originally posted by Chicken Little

quote:
Originally posted by Crash Daily

If Dims had anything to do with it, we wouldn't BE in a position to be winning in Iraq at this point in time. Now you want to take the flag and run with it? Idiots. This little stunt won't fly the flag. It's still under a Dim, you know, traitors, that tried to cost us the war.  It's hype and B.S. and you can only use it now because we didn't let you force America to lose the war. Your all a bunch of Jane Fond B*tch's.

Do you get paid for this crap?  Your boy Bushie is about to sign a "cut and run" (//%22http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-ed-iraq23-2008aug23,0,1093339.story%22) deal, by the way; timetable of 2011 and everthing...the whole shebang!

Man, you must feel like an idiot; a complete and utter jackass.  It must be hard knowing that your war-hero Bush is turning his back on the troops.  But forget the troops, right?  Bush turned "traitor" on YOU; that's gotta be painful.  I mean, you stuck with him through thick and thin.  Geez, I mean, Bush is such a hypocrite.  To defend him now would just make you a hypocrite too, right?  You'd sound like a TOTAL moron if you said anything nice about that flag-burning cut-and-runner Bush, right?

quote:
That does not make McCain wrong and B.O. right.
That's exactly what it does, you bucket-head.



Nice editing moron. You forgot to mention the fact that I M-E-N-T-I-O-N-E-D Iraq has every right to choose to have a timetable, even if we disagree. The Bush Admin, probably not expecting it to bite them in the @SS, made that clear years ago when you buffoons first started trying to cost America the war. You obviously read my post, so either you're a complete idiot or you intentionally left out the most important part, misleading and spinning this little post, ignoring the facts, as it appears you are quite good at. Which is it? There's no third option, you're a liar or an idiot. Which is it? My vote's on liar. As I said staying as long as it takes vs. trying to cost us the war. This current choice is Iraq's. When you trash on someone in specific, try to put those two corroded brain cells together and come up with a coherent argument.

I don't carry Bush's water either. I have plenty of problems with him and even more with McCain. When idiot Dim's give us no choice but to vote, by throwing supreme morons like Gore, Kerry and Obama at us, we haven't got much choice but to smell sh*t instead of eating it. Lieberman WAS the only sane man left in your Party. WAS. He's still way to left for me, but he's the only one that doesn't try to hide who he is and what he really stands for, that's actually close enough to the middle to be palatable. You should have nominated him when you had the chance. Bush would have been gone four years ago.




Lieberman's less than credible.  He got mad because his own state voted him out, dumped his party and registered Independent then waged war on his opponent and won.  He's not even a DINO anymore.  He might as well sign his name as an R because he's got McCain Brown Nose Syndrome.

Biden was a smart choice.  If McCain picks Lieberman OR Romney, then bye-bye base....
Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: Crash Daily on August 26, 2008, 08:57:01 PM
If McCain doesn't pick a real Conservative, I'm back to not voting again. Lieberman was the Dims chance to get rid of Bush 4 yrs ago. We don't want him. He's no more a Republican than he was when he was a member of the Jackass Party.

Libs are all a bunch of loons and centrists, like Lieberman and McCain aren't much better. If he picks a centrist running mate, he loses the base and the Presidency. At least the total demise of this nation will belong squarely on the shoulders of the crazed lunatics that run it.
Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: USRufnex on August 26, 2008, 09:29:31 PM
Spoken like a true Repub-tard.

Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: Hoss on August 26, 2008, 10:55:01 PM
quote:
Originally posted by USRufnex

Spoken like a true Repub-tard.





Did you really expect anything more from Crash?
Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: Chicken Little on August 26, 2008, 11:07:13 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Crash Daily

Nice editing moron. You forgot to mention the fact that I M-E-N-T-I-O-N-E-D Iraq has every right to choose to have a timetable, even if we disagree. The Bush Admin, probably not expecting it to bite them in the @SS, made that clear years ago when you buffoons first started trying to cost America the war. You obviously read my post, so either you're a complete idiot or you intentionally left out the most important part, misleading and spinning this little post, ignoring the facts, as it appears you are quite good at. Which is it? There's no third option, you're a liar or an idiot. Which is it? My vote's on liar. As I said staying as long as it takes vs. trying to cost us the war. This current choice is Iraq's. When you trash on someone in specific, try to put those two corroded brain cells together and come up with a coherent argument.

I don't carry Bush's water either. I have plenty of problems with him and even more with McCain. When idiot Dim's give us no choice but to vote, by throwing supreme morons like Gore, Kerry and Obama at us, we haven't got much choice but to smell sh*t instead of eating it. Lieberman WAS the only sane man left in your Party. WAS. He's still way to left for me, but he's the only one that doesn't try to hide who he is and what he really stands for, that's actually close enough to the middle to be palatable. You should have nominated him when you had the chance. Bush would have been gone four years ago.


Oh my gyad!(http://www.adultswim.co.uk/images/shows/metalocalypse/pickles.jpg)

Your brain is hosed, man.  I dial ya an ambulance but I'm paralyzed by the spectacle of watching you unravel.

quote:
Iraq has every right to choose to have a timetable, even if we disagree.
(Emphasis mine).  Who the f*ck is we?  You and McCain?  And the mouse in your pocket makes three.  

quote:
...you intentionally left out the most important part...
Your posts have a most important part?  It sounds like word salad from a seizing Karl Rove:  Juggler Obama sane the only spin Lieberman bananapants? As long as it takes or 100 years, and problems hide middle stand idiot.
 
quote:
(Leiberman's) still way to left for me.
Dude, Franco was too left for you.
Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: TulsaSue on August 27, 2008, 09:59:27 AM
Considering that a strong majority of Iraqis want U.S.-led military forces to immediately withdraw from the country, saying their swift departure would make Iraq more secure and decrease sectarian violence, according to new polls by the State Department and independent researchers, aren't we occupying an unwilling nation like Bush's buddy, Putin?

In Baghdad, nearly three-quarters of residents polled said they would feel safer if U.S. and other foreign forces left Iraq, with 65 percent of those asked favoring an immediate pullout, according to State Department polling results obtained by The Washington Post.

And his mini-me McCain wants to stay there for 100 years!!  I guess against their will . . .

"No way, no how, no McCain"


New navigation at http://obamascrapbook.com (//%22http://obamascrapbook.com%22)
Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: TulsaSue on August 27, 2008, 10:02:58 AM
(http://i260.photobucket.com/albums/ii19/SLdkos/McCain%20Collection/2715381182_bd2b5f4420.jpg)
Title: Who is this guy Obama?
Post by: guido911 on August 28, 2008, 10:17:56 AM
Here is a musical summary of Obama-isms over the past several months:

http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/28/video-barack-obamas-greatest-hits/

I really believe this will make that scrapbook of yours TS.