You were going on about lies about how Palin was falsely associated with the Gifford shooting... in a fashion that was not even remotely as direct an accusation as the decades of lies we have heard about how the Clintons killed or had killed dozens of people. If you are SO offended by a casual, loosely accusatory note about Palin, where is your indignation at the much greater injustice??
I know... selective outrage. Selective morality.
I have the feeling you actually did understand the association, but once again, wanted to play obtuse so you could disseminate disingenuous nonsense. At least, I hope you are able to still make these connections at your age!
OMG you still talking? Just stop. And do not try to read anything into what I was stating. You are not that clever.
I have no idea why you dragged the Clintons into a discussion about why one defamation case (Palin) was different from another (Scaramucci), or why one did not proceed and why the other did not.