Thanks, but I think I'd rather use as a source the U.S. Census bureau and its fairly scientific estimations for percentages of people at or below the poverty level, than someone who uses half-addled assumptions and freaky biases and who can't even communicate in clear English half the time.
But that's just me.
I have not used “poverty” in any estimates. It is quite evident that your biases overshadow the hundreds of surveys that are available. Government surveys have a tendency to lean sometimes to the advantage of those in power. In today news are the ones that suggest that we are slowly coming out of the recession while another suggest that we will increase the national debt another 7 trillion dollars in the next decade. This could increase the peoples obligation to some 17 trillion dollars. Divide that by the population and see if the bureaucracy comes up the same figure per citizen you are obligated for. The conditions exist today that existed in 1929. The stock market was liken the rollercoaster where those playing it could buy stock one day and sell it the next day for a profit. Then one day there was a call of hands. Banks closed not having the FDIC, which is on road of bankruptcy today and poverty grew as the depositor lined up outside the banks asking for their money they never was to get. GI 10K bonds are being sold today, as a matter of protocol for the low interest rates. Having been through this once I don’t believe it needs to be written on the wall by government, who’s just powers are derived from the people, do have the tendency to pad the facts in their favor.
Shakespeare, Translators of the Bible, and myself seem to have trouble correlating our thoughts in the English language.
Accept my apology, please.