Right...got it. You still think walking in on a group of naked 15 and 16 year old girls is no biggie... Got it...
And again, NO, he was not accused of walking in on naked women. He talked about it. Admitted it. Bragged about doing it. As if it were his right. Another big difference you don't seem to get. And by definition, when he does that to a 15 year old girl, it is rape. When he does it to a room full of them, it is serial rape.
As for your link, yeah, I have seen it before and read it. Let's see if you will read this one...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juanita_BroaddrickFrom your link, an eye witness who shared a room with Broaddrick corroborates her account, so what was your point in posting the wiki link?
Broaddrick shared the hotel room with her friend and employee Norma Rogers. Rogers attended a conference seminar that morning, and says she returned to their room to find Broaddrick on the bed “in a state of shock,” her pantyhose torn in the crotch and her lip swollen as though she had been hit.[7] Rogers says Broaddrick told her Clinton had "forced himself on her."[7] Rogers helped Broaddrick ice her lip, and then the women left Little Rock. Rogers said that Broaddrick was very upset on the way home and blamed herself for letting Clinton in the room.[3] Broaddrick says she did not tell her husband, Gary Hickey, about the incident, and told him she accidentally injured her lip. He told NBC he did not remember the injury or her explanation.[3][8] David Broaddrick, however, has said he noticed her injured lip, and she told him that Clinton had raped her when he asked about it.[3] Three other friends confirmed that Broaddrick had told them about the incident at the time: Susan Lewis, Louis Ma, and Jean Darden, Norma Rogers’ sister.[3] Broaddrick did not recall the date of the alleged incident, but said it was spring of 1978 and that she had stayed in the Camelot Hotel. Records show Broaddrick attended a nursing home meeting at the Camelot Hotel in Little Rock on April 25, 1978.[3][8] The Clinton White House would not respond to requests for Clinton's official schedule for the date,[9] but news reports suggest that he was in Little Rock that day, with no official commitments in the morning.[3]
Walking in on a group of naked women (or girls) on purpose or accident is nowhere close to the definition of rape. Peeping Tom possibly. I think you need to look up the legal definition of rape, even age doesn’t make a difference on that as you assert.
Well here, I saved you the time. Here’s the DOJ’s official definition of rape, updated in 2012:
“The penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.”
https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/blog/updated-definition-rapeDid any contestant make claims of any penetration or unwanted advance? No.
One would think out of all the teen contestants in the dressing room, someone’s parents would have taken Trump to task at the time or had gone to the authorities, but we can find no evidence of that, can we?
So four women said Trump came in the dressing room, 11 say it either didn’t happen or they don’t remember. Of the ones who say it happened, they rushed to cover their bodies so there’s not even any clear statement that he saw a nude teen. Four witnesses saying it happened and 11 questioning if it did or not remembering it seems to bring up reasonable doubt.
I’m not a Trump apologist but people have a serious problem with picking up bits of facts and creating their own reality with it. Walking in on naked women suddenly becomes serial rape? Really? He had no right to do it as pageant owner or interested spectator, but it’s still not rape and no allegations were ever brought that it was.
I really don’t see a difference than gym or sports coaches walking through the locker room while teen athletes are showering and changing yet I don’t recall that as leading to rape allegations nor anyone talking about it being creepy when I was a teen. Well, except Trump is a creep.
Still you don’t have a legit claim to rape, that’s just hyperbole.
:
Four women who competed in the 1997 Miss Teen USA beauty pageant said Donald Trump walked into the dressing room while contestants — some as young as 15 — were changing.
"I remember putting on my dress really quick because I was like, ‘Oh my god, there’s a man in here,’ " said Mariah Billado, the former Miss Vermont Teen USA.
Trump, she recalled, said something like, "Don’t worry, ladies, I’ve seen it all before."
Three other women, who asked to remain anonymous for fear of getting engulfed in a media firestorm, also remembered Trump entering the dressing room while girls were changing. Two of them said the girls rushed to cover their bodies, with one calling it "shocking" and "creepy." The third said she was clothed and introduced herself to Trump.
The story also reported:
Of the 11 (contestants) who said they don’t remember Trump coming into the changing room, some said it was possible that it happened while they weren’t in the room or that they didn’t notice. But most were dubious or dismissed the possibility out of hand.
Allison Bowman, former Miss Wisconsin Teen USA, cast doubt on whether it happened. "These were teenage girls," Bowman said. "If anything inappropriate had gone on, the gossip would have flown."
http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/article/2016/oct/18/allegations-about-donald-trump-and-miss-teen-usa-c/None of the women who talked to BuzzFeed News said Trump touched them or said anything explicit. Meanwhile, 11 other contestants didn’t remember seeing Trump walk into the dressing area. The Trump campaign has called these stories “totally false.”
https://thinkprogress.org/trump-beauty-pageants-naked-2dc4b6c6d507/Even from a far left site, their story states Trump never touched anyone nor said anything explicit. Let’s see you document how this becomes rape.
Trump is a creep, we all get it, there’s no need to try and convince anyone of it. Yet you persist in trying to diminish Clinton’s behavior in a rape or sexual assault allegation on Clinton which had corroborating witnesses simply to make Trump look worse. That is clearly what you are doing here.